Jump to content

Thanks for visiting BtownBanners.com!  We noticed you have AdBlock enabled.  While ads can be annoying, we utilize them to provide these forums free of charge to you!  Please consider removing your AdBlock for BtownBanners or consider signing up to donate and help BtownBanners stay alive!  Thank you!

rebelhoosier848891

National Title Odds---IU versus Maryland

Recommended Posts

We all know it's just a guess at this point and IU is not even done recruiting yet---but I cannot understand all the Maryland hype both to win the Big Ten or even a National Championship.  One recent oddsmaker has Maryland with a 9/1 chance to win the National title with Duke, UK, and UNC all close behind at 10/1 odds. IU came in at 25/1 odds to win it all. My question is why Maryland over IU?  I thought we were basically equal to them last year and I think they lost Dez Wells---a key senior leader.  They have talent coming in but it is young and will need to learn to play defense. We have an experienced veteran group returning and I see us as equal to or better than them.  What's your thoughts Hoosier Nation?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Yes. I think it is Maryland and then everyone else right now. With Michigan State, Indiana, Purdue, Wisconsin, Illinois and Michigan fighting after that. Melo Trimble reminds me A LOT of Trey Burke who ended up winning B1G player of the year and lead UM to the Nat'l Title game. Sulaimon is a great defender that can hit the 3. Layman can shoot is a possible 1st round pick. They have a good transfer coming in. They have a big time recruit coming in. They have experience coming back just like we do... except their experience played better defense than ours.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
More than half of Maryland's wins in the B1G last season were by two possessions or less. They were the #2 "luckiest" team in KenPom's ratings.

@MSU (68-66 2OT)
Vs NW (68-67)
Vs PSU (64-58)
Vs IU (68-66)
@PSU (76-73)
Vs Neb (69-65)
Vs Wis (59-53)
@Neb (64-61)
Vs IU (75-69) (neutral court)

I believe Dez Wells, and the refs in some cases, played a major role in closing out those games. They add several more talented players in Stone, Sulaimon, and the transfer from Georgia Tech. I think they are the favorites but a lot will depend on if they can replace Dez Wells as a leader and closer.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

More than half of Maryland's wins in the B1G last season were by two possessions or less. They were the #2 "luckiest" team in KenPom's ratings.

@MSU (68-66 2OT)
Vs NW (68-67)
Vs PSU (64-58)
Vs IU (68-66)
@PSU (76-73)
Vs Neb (69-65)
Vs Wis (59-53)
@Neb (64-61)
Vs IU (75-69) (neutral court)

I believe Dez Wells, and the refs in some cases, played a major role in closing out those games. They add several more talented players in Stone, Sulaimon, and the transfer from Georgia Tech. I think they are the favorites but a lot will depend on if they can replace Dez Wells as a leader and closer.

ken Pom has a luck rating? I wouldn't call closing out tight games luck

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Good discussion. My feeling was that they won a lot of close games that we lost close---- and to me they didn't play defense much better than we did. I am not on their bandwagon----and think Dez is a bigger loss than people think.  I predict they will NOT win the conference or the National Championship.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

ken Pom has a luck rating? I wouldn't call closing out tight games luck

I would call it luck when an opponent misses a FT that percentages say he should have made or calls mysteriously go your way. There's a luck factor in everything. Sometimes the ball just bounces your way. In 2013-2014 Maryland finished as the 328 "luckiest" team while going 17-15.

Edit: I'm not saying luck alone determines if a team wins/loses. Players still have to make plays but in some circumstances your team can only hope and pray.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Good discussion. My feeling was that they won a lot of close games that we lost close---- and to me they didn't play defense much better than we did. I am not on their bandwagon----and think Dez is a bigger loss than people think. I predict they will NOT win the conference or the National Championship.

marylands defense was 40th according to ken Pom, while our defense was 214th.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

ken Pom has a luck rating? I wouldn't call closing out tight games luck

Luck is defined as "A measure of the deviation between a team’s actual winning percentage and what one would expect from its game-by-game efficiencies. It’s a Dean Oliver invention. Essentially, a team involved in a lot of close games should not win (or lose) all of them. Those that do will be viewed as lucky (or unlucky)."

 

Plainly, you should only win about 50% of your close games, so if you are winning a lot more then you're a little lucky. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I think Maryland deserves to be the conference favorite and a highly ranked team, but with that said, I also believe the Dez Wells loss is being way undersold nationally. As was mentioned, they played a lot of close games last year, and many of them were against average at best teams, and quite often it was Dez Wells making the winning plays.

This will be a different team next year. If Suliamon starts then we're talking about 3 new starters. I also am not sure I love Layman at the 3. They're extremely talented, and have a lot of depth, but I also don't think they're runaway favorites for the league. Favorites? Yes. But it won't be easy. This is not going to be like Wisconsin last year just running away with it. More like IU in 12-13.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

marylands defense was 40th according to ken Pom, while our defense was 214th.

 

I do like it when posters bring out the facts.  I sure didn't see the 40th ranked defense when we played them. They must have really brought it in some of their other games.  They also played a few of the better Big Ten teams when those teams had key injuries which helped their stats---an example was at MSU when they won early.
 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I do like it when posters bring out the facts. I sure didn't see the 40th ranked defense when we played them. They must have really brought it in some of their other games. They also played a few of the better Big Ten teams when those teams had key injuries which helped their stats---an example was at MSU when they won early.

IU matched up well. We also spot stupidly good at AH and hit 18 3's.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×