Jump to content

Thanks for visiting BtownBanners.com!  We noticed you have AdBlock enabled.  While ads can be annoying, we utilize them to provide these forums free of charge to you!  Please consider removing your AdBlock for BtownBanners or consider signing up to donate and help BtownBanners stay alive!  Thank you!

Recommended Posts

I think last year was more of pure desperation for someone to play. When Austin Etherington starts a handful of games, your team is in trouble haha

How about when you sit your lottery pick big and bring Austin in to guard Kaminsky in the low post with 1 min. left needing a stop and he gives up a three point play. I'd call that insanity. :yes:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree 100 percent with what you are saying. So that must mean Hollowell was great in practice time and time again, because he saw all kinds of playing time. I don't buy it. Pin the tail seems more realistic then that scenario.

 

No, very likely Hollowell was in a fog in practice also.

 

AND he got minutes anyway. Which was a huge mistake.

 

AND, our team chemistry was awful. Last year CTC chose to play some more talented kids with lesser attitudes over the harder-working less talented kids too often. And he still took major grief for playing Howard and Etherington over Hanner and Hollowell. It did not go well.

 

See?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

How about when you sit your lottery pick big and bring Austin in to guard Kaminsky in the low post with 1 min. left needing a stop and he gives up a three point play. I'd call that insanity. :yes:

 

Crean out-thought himself on that one. I remember what he said after the game - something about Vonleh not doing a good job switching on screens and wanting to make sure Kaminsky was covered at the 3 pt line. Unfortunately in coming up with that idea he overlooked the prospect of what would happen if Hartman had to guard Kaminsky on the block.

 

Speaking of that, I suppose we may get to see Hartman guard Kaminsky quite a bit in just a couple weeks. Ugh.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Alex Bozich (@insidethehall):
RT @ZachOsterman Crean: "A lot of our subbing, it's not pin the tail on the donkey, like I think some people like to think it is." #iubb


If it looks like a donkey, smells like a donkey, sounds like a donkey, acts like a donkey...hell, maybe Crean just doesn't know what a donkey is! Maybe he's been thinking he was pinning the tail on Secretariat? Lol

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

How about when you sit your lottery pick big and bring Austin in to guard Kaminsky in the low post with 1 min. left needing a stop and he gives up a three point play. I'd call that insanity. :yes:

A lottery pick that is at the end of the bench of a terrible team in the NBA ;) But thats another story

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Giving playing time to players who do not earn minutes in practice, especially when kids like Hartman, Holt, Burton, and Priller are working their ever-loving asses off, sends a terrible message, kills team morale, and is a terrible idea. Given what we've learned, it's likely a big part of the reason that Hanner got very little run his first two years.

If Jeremiah April has a crappy work ethic, kudos to the coaching staff for not putting him into games.

Period.


While I agree they should get kudos for not playing kids who don't earn it in practice at some point in time I think you have to question someone's ability to judge character if they keep signing those type of players.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

good point I bet that is it. I would award a guy for actually having a good practice for once by giving him meaningful minutes against the number five team in the nation lol. Just admit there is know rhyme or reason to what creans subs r. It is what it is

#5, #305. There is no difference. There is Harrell etc and an attempt to see what April could do to help offset that disparity. We sure as hell didn't lose to Louisville because April played 5 mins.

 

It makes no sense to say if he put him in against the best team, then it makes no sense putting him in against the worst, while saying he should get a chance to see what he could do. Perhaps, he was put in against a team with good bigs to see if his size could prove valuable and get a chance to see what he could do and he failed at the chance and has continued to practice poorly.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

#5, #305. There is no difference. There is Harrell etc and an attempt to see what April could do to help offset that disparity. We sure as hell didn't lose to Louisville because April played 5 mins.

It makes no sense to say if he put him in against the best team, then it makes no sense putting him in against the worst, while saying he should get a chance to see what he could do. Perhaps, he was put in against a team with good bigs to see if his size could prove valuable and get a chance to see what he could do and he failed at the chance and has continued to practice poorly.

we didnt lose because april played 2 minutes but the game was close until he went with what I considered a insane lineup and it cost us. I like your try to make sense of the situation but I dont agree. If he don't practice hard then leave him on the bench and if u want to see what he had put him in more against cupcakes or when up 30.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×