Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 minute ago, NashvilleHoosier said:

It doesn't mean the bubble gets bigger. You're just describing how teams move on and off the bubble in both directions. I think Stuhoo and USPS covered it pretty well so I won't regurgitate that. 

Honestly no one should be talking about a bubble until mid February.   After Valentine’s Day is when I start looking at that more closely.    I’m guessing a lot of national bubble watch articles are similar.  

Posted
2 minutes ago, Uspshoosier said:

Honestly no one should be talking about a bubble until mid February.   After Valentine’s Day is when I start looking at that more closely.    I’m guessing a lot of national bubble watch articles are similar.  

True. I'm only referring to a bubble in that moment in time. If someone is putting together a projected field, there is a bubble at that moment in time. Teams seeded 7, 8, 9, maybe even some 10s aren't considered bubble teams at that moment. 

Posted
On 1/31/2021 at 10:23 AM, Uspshoosier said:

Going to be interesting to see how the committee handles teams schedules this year. In this odd year you have teams that have played a killer schedule and then you had teams opt out of their non conference tourneys to feast on low and mid majors to stack wins.  
 

team A 

13-3

net-26

Q1-(2-2)  wins(N-40), @41

Q-2  (1-0) wins @110

Q3 and 4- 10 wins vs teams above 100

11 of 16 games against teams over 100

 

team B

9-7

net-34

Q1-(4-5) wins-5,23, @43, @48    
Q2-(1-1)

Q3 and 4- (4-0) 

3 of 16 games against teams over 100

 

 

 

 

Team A = USC 

Team B = Rutgers 

Posted
5 minutes ago, HoosierAloha said:


Wow! I thought they had played a tougher schedule than that. The PAC 12 has some decent teams this year that should get in the tourney no?


Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners mobile app

Tougher then the league was last year but the middle and bottom of the league hurts the numbers.  5 teams projected in the field as of today for me.  Arizona would be another team in the conversation but they self imposed this year.    

Posted

Where things stand for IU on Feb 3

9-8

NET-48

Q1-(1-7)   3 road losses(4,16,26) with 2 of those in OT,  3 Home losses(4 in OT, 25,29), 1 neutral loss(17),   road win(6)

Q2-(4-0) 2 home wins(32,37), 2 Neutral wins(58,86)

Q3-(2-1) road win(170), Neutral win(131), home loss(85)

Q4- 2-0

KenPom-27

Torvik-31

sagarin-28

BPI-28

SOS- 9(kenPom and espn)

Remaining scheduled games

Home-Iowa(6), Minny(49), Sparty(93), Michigan(3)

Road-northwestern(85), Ohio St(12), Rutgers(29), Purdue(25)

2 road games against Sparty and Michigan if they get made up.(These games could become very important )

For now with these numbers IU would be in the tournament if the tournament started today.   The computer numbers like IU more then their record would show.   When looking at their overall record  remember the committee still has to field a bracket with 36(37 this year) at large teams.  IU is still one them as of today.    Where things will get interesting will be in how the committee views each teams schedules.   Will they penalize teams for skipping out on their non conference and feasting on cupcakes or will they penalize teams that played a tougher schedule and how more losses.  No one knows the answer to this yet.    iu playing in the B1G is a curse and a blessing.    Regardless of me thinking they would be one of the 37  at-large teams if they losses keep piling up then it wont matter and they will miss out.  However if they put together a little winning streak with the remaining games they will solidify their spot.   There is a chance teams will get in with a .500 record this year.    Hopefully they are not one of the teams that will test this out. 

IU was definitely in better shape last year so far then they are this year but the opportunities are in front of them.

 

Posted

So just looking at the remainder of our schedule from a Quad perspective... 

 

 

Sat, Feb 13

12:00 PM
 
espn-red@2x.png
 
Wed, Feb 17 TBD    
Sat, Feb 20 12:00 PM
 
espn-red@2x.png
 
Wed, Feb 24
@Rutgers25 Rutgers
TBD    
Sat, Feb 27
vsMichigan3 Michigan
TBD    
Sat, Mar 6
@Purdue24 Purdue

PLUS the postponed game at Michigan if we make that up????

 

Quadrant 1: Home 1-30, Neutral 1-50, Away 1-75. - 

At OSU (6)

At Rutgers (26)

Michigan (3)

At Michigan (3)??

At Purdue (23)


Quadrant 2: Home 31-75, Neutral 51-100, Away 76-135.

Minnesota (52)


Quadrant 3: Home 76-160, Neutral 101-200, Away 135-240.

Michigan State (83)


Quadrant 4: Home 161-353, Neutral 201-353, Away 241-353.

NA

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...