Jump to content

Thanks for visiting BtownBanners.com!  We noticed you have AdBlock enabled.  While ads can be annoying, we utilize them to provide these forums free of charge to you!  Please consider removing your AdBlock for BtownBanners or consider signing up to donate and help BtownBanners stay alive!  Thank you!

Stuhoo

The Pack-Line Defense

Recommended Posts

Personally, I don't like this defense compared to good old fashioned man to man.

On 7/18/2017 at 1:40 PM, Stuhoo said:

 

Not necessarily like a match up zone or a sagging man to man, though there are commonalities:

A matchup zone usually pressures more than this defense off the ball and relies on regular switching to allow for help defense. This defense relies on help, not switching.

A sagging man to man does not pressure the ball or the immediate pass recipient so heavily. The pack-line pressures the ball handler heavily and dares the pass recipient to drive, while forcing that pass recipient into the pack.

This defense doesn't "trap" per se, but it is designed to constantly create help situations whereby multiple defenders are available to maximize the defense near the basket. Can be susceptible to a great catch and shoot player, and doesn't produce as many turnovers and transition opportunities. 

 

I appreciate the explanation, but it sure looks and smells like the old match up zone. If you watch the video, the placement of the other off ball players is the same as a matchup zone. I also don't remember switching much in a match up zone either since the off defenders aren't closely guarding their men. The real difference I see is forcing the ball into the middle or "pack" vs straight up man for the on ball defender. I'm also not sold on devaluing offensive boards, especially if we have a lineup full of long bodies where at least 2 should be able to get back on defense and stop fast breaks. Just my $.02.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 7/20/2017 at 9:32 AM, schoosier said:

Personally, I don't like this defense compared to good old fashioned man to man.

I appreciate the explanation, but it sure looks and smells like the old match up zone. If you watch the video, the placement of the other off ball players is the same as a matchup zone. I also don't remember switching much in a match up zone either since the off defenders aren't closely guarding their men. The real difference I see is forcing the ball into the middle or "pack" vs straight up man for the on ball defender. I'm also not sold on devaluing offensive boards, especially if we have a lineup full of long bodies where at least 2 should be able to get back on defense and stop fast breaks. Just my $.02.

Arizona, Dayton, and Virginia use this and are very successful and efficient defensively pretty much every year. Last year, their defensive efficiency ratings were as follows: 47th, 27th, and 5th. I will take that in a heartbeat.

It is man-to-man. A very stingy man-to-man. I'm not sure you really understand what it is. There are several videos on YouTube. And again, it's very effective when done correctly.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, RBB89 said:

Arizona, Dayton, and Virginia use this and are very successful and efficient defensively pretty much every year. Last year, their defensive efficiency ratings were as follows: 47th, 27th, and 5th. I will take that in a heartbeat.

It is man-to-man. A very stingy man-to-man. I'm not sure you really understand what it is. There are several videos on YouTube. And again, it's very effective when done correctly.

Yeah, if pack-line isn't man-to-man I'm not sure what is?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
29 minutes ago, Stuhoo said:

 


It IS a man to man. It's a man to man that de-emphasizes pressuring certain areas on the floor, and emphasizes certain areas.

 

That's my point, too. Any version of man (zone, too) makes implementation choices: full- or half-court, switch all, some, or no screens, how both the big and small defender react to ball screens, try to deny baseline drives, trap corners, and many more. Pack line is a set of choices among those — a school of thought of man-to-man, created by Dick Bennett.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, RBB89 said:

Arizona, Dayton, and Virginia use this and are very successful and efficient defensively pretty much every year. Last year, their defensive efficiency ratings were as follows: 47th, 27th, and 5th. I will take that in a heartbeat.

It is man-to-man. A very stingy man-to-man. I'm not sure you really understand what it is. There are several videos on YouTube. And again, it's very effective when done correctly.

No worries. That's the reason I asked for further clarification. I would also state a regular man to man or match up zone is also  very effective when done correctly. A good coach would exploit this pack line defense as long as he had the three point shooters to do it. How many championships did this type of defense win last year?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
No worries. That's the reason I asked for further clarification. I would also state a regular man to man or match up zone is also  very effective when done correctly. A good coach would exploit this pack line defense as long as he had the three point shooters to do it. How many championships did this type of defense win last year?

A good coach could exploit every defense, but they won't. I think most any defense will look good if there is commitment and decent coaching involved. UNC wasn't a good defensive team for most of the year and essentially plays a match up zone. Not sure why ask how man titles were won with it last year?


Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners mobile app

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
46 minutes ago, schoosier said:

No worries. That's the reason I asked for further clarification. I would also state a regular man to man or match up zone is also  very effective when done correctly. A good coach would exploit this pack line defense as long as he had the three point shooters to do it. How many championships did this type of defense win last year?

2 regular season and 1 conference tourney off of my head. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
No worries. That's the reason I asked for further clarification. I would also state a regular man to man or match up zone is also  very effective when done correctly. A good coach would exploit this pack line defense as long as he had the three point shooters to do it. How many championships did this type of defense win last year?

Exactly 113.48 titles last year, more or less. ;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, mdn82 said:


A good coach could exploit every defense, but they won't. I think most any defense will look good if there is commitment and decent coaching involved. UNC wasn't a good defensive team for most of the year and essentially plays a match up zone. Not sure why ask how man titles were won with it last year?


Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners mobile app

Combined with a standard man defense, this pack line could be successful. Using it with other variations like trapping, pressing, etc... is where I could see sustained success. I think if it's what you bring every game, it would be easy to plan for and beat with good shooters. I mentioned championships only because I don't believe using this gimick type d will result in many.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
19 minutes ago, Class of '66 Old Fart said:

Or switching from man-to-man to zone in the middle of a possession.

Hey, it created confusion; it just confused the wrong team.  One of many things I won't miss about that staff, they couldn't even teach a competent man-to-man and insisted on trying to complicate things.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, mdn82 said:

The thing I am excited about is not having 5 defenders running in circles looking lost.

I am also excited not seeing this anymore. We have gone 2 decades playing mostly matador defense except during the Sampson years and the one abberation of Creans next to last year after we lost JB2. I'm all in to see what Arch can teach which should be a huge upgrade.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, HoosierAloha said:

Is it really a gimmick defense? It's more of slightly different principals on a man to man defense.

You're right. I'm surprised more people haven't heard of this.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×