Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
9 minutes ago, gfunk69 said:

 


I understand that. But I kinda agree with X on this. You can continually build skill but size/lenghth/athleticism is something you are born with and can only be improved so much. Skills can be taught. If someone trains for 4 years hard on there shot, ball handling, defense,... They could improve a lot. However if they train 4 years trying to get bigger, faster strong they will only get as far as their genetics allow.

And now you've introduced something more than length, skill, size, and athleticism.  Passion, desire, etc. to continue to get better is another aspect of recruiting what fits in your system. 

Posted
And now you've introduced something more than length, skill, size, and athleticism.  Passion, desire, etc. to continue to get better is another aspect of recruiting what fits in your system. 


Passion/desire and dedication fit into all systems. It is just getting those kids. A smaller school could have easily gotten an OG or Vic. And those are the types of players I'd go after at a super small school to play the 2 and 3.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G900A using BtownBanners mobile app

Posted

Honestly, SDSU could be a power out in the west. Cal, UCLA, and UW are starting to pick it up their recruiting but for awhile it was just UA. At SDSU you could attract the western talent that wants to focus on just basketball.

There defense has been good to great but their offense has been turrrble, most years, at best. Maybe we could hire Fischer as D-coordinator?

Posted
I really liked that UAB team from a couple years ago that beat... Iowa State?

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G900A using BtownBanners mobile app




I am surprised to hear u say u liked a mediocre team like UAB knowing how much u dislike mediocrity by your past posting history. They finished 20-16 ( 12-6 in conference USA, with losses to Florida Atlantic, FIU, north Texas, and rice). They did get hot at the right time of year though


Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners
Posted

I am surprised to hear u say u liked a mediocre team like UAB knowing how much u dislike mediocrity by your past posting history. They finished 20-16 ( 12-6 in conference USA, with losses to Florida Atlantic, FIU, north Texas, and rice). They did get hot at the right time of year though


Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners

And last year the same team finished 26-7.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G900A using BtownBanners mobile app

Posted

Stupidly no. Neither did Monmouth. Because the committee would rather put mediocre power teams in like Syracuse.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G900A using BtownBanners mobile app


I agree on Monmouth they actually scheduled and beat teams from power 5 conferences on the road and neutral. UAB is a different story. 25-6 against division 1 (18-3 against rpi +150) (3-1 against top 100, 4-2 against rpi 101-150), sos 296. I guess their best win was at middle Tennessee (15 seed). I'm sorry but I would take a mediocre power team over that resume any day.


Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners
Posted

I agree on Monmouth they actually scheduled and beat teams from power 5 conferences on the road and neutral. UAB is a different story. 25-6 against division 1 (18-3 against rpi +150) (3-1 against top 100, 4-2 against rpi 101-150), sos 296. I guess their best win was at middle Tennessee (15 seed). I'm sorry but I would take a mediocre power team over that resume any day.


Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners

I'm more for giving mid majors a chance.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G900A using BtownBanners mobile app

Posted

I am as well as long as they have at least earned it with wins against teams that are at least in the top 100 or teams that are tournament worthy.


Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners





I'm more for giving mid majors a chance.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G900A using BtownBanners mobile app


A team like UAB you just have to watch. A team more than capable of upsets. Like the year before. A team that won their conference and didn't finish 8th.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G900A using BtownBanners mobile app

Posted

And? I still don't believe they should have gotten in.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G900A using BtownBanners mobile app



So you'd rather have a team get in and probably get bounced the first weekend because they won a bunch of games with an incredibly weak schedule than watch a traditional power house in a down year in a tough conference make it to the final four? And if you are such a fan of size and athleticism, isn't Syracuse the poster child of that style of play?


Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners
Posted


So you'd rather have a team get in and probably get bounced the first weekend because they won a bunch of games with an incredibly weak schedule than watch a traditional power house in a down year in a tough conference make it to the final four? And if you are such a fan of size and athleticism, isn't Syracuse the poster child of that style of play?


Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners

He's also a proponent of playing tough schedules. He hates playing the cupcakes. So he's arguing with himself.


Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners
Posted


So you'd rather have a team get in and probably get bounced the first weekend because they won a bunch of games with an incredibly weak schedule than watch a traditional power house in a down year in a tough conference make it to the final four? And if you are such a fan of size and athleticism, isn't Syracuse the poster child of that style of play?


Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners

Yes. Cuse had no business in the tourney. It was all name. You finish 10th in your conference at 9-9 then you don't belong. I don't care what conference you're in. It is like the old Big East where teams with under .500 records in conference were getting in. It was a joke. Cuse getting in was a joke. And I think they were 19-12 going into the conference tourney and lost first round to Pitt.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G900A using BtownBanners mobile app

Posted

He's also a proponent of playing tough schedules. He hates playing the cupcakes. So he's arguing with himself.


Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners

The oddity of X being on the board.
1). Has his own site
2). He's here more than there
3). He argues with any/everyone
4). He contradicts himself
5). Has caused people to stay away

(Un)Fortunately, he's still around. It's fun to jump in and sling some mud around but then realize you feel kind of sorry for him. Glad things are getting back to normal with a solid group of posters.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...