Jump to content

Thanks for visiting BtownBanners.com!  We noticed you have AdBlock enabled.  While ads can be annoying, we utilize them to provide these forums free of charge to you!  Please consider removing your AdBlock for BtownBanners or consider signing up to donate and help BtownBanners stay alive!  Thank you!

Bk4life

No Holt?

Recommended Posts

Whats the deal here? I remember the countless articles, board posts concerning this kid and how he would come in and immediately be a player...he sat like April...Hanner is obviously going to be ineffective in the Big Ten and we are not bringing Holt in to spell him, AT LEAST? Hartman is better than Holt at this point? Someone make me understand....We barely survived against an SMU that is nominal at best and without its best player...Holt should be getting some time...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Gee, could not be much worse than 29 minutes , ZERO REBOUNDS, 1 turnover and 3 points for HMP....This kid was supposed to be ready to come in and help team immediately...I am not sure how he could have performed much worse than Hanner inside....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Wow, really low expectations for this team...I searched the box score for "deflections" and could not find that stat...so we are now counting deflections for worthiness to start...We will be killed in the Big Ten if we are starting kids inside due to their penchant for deflections... :stop:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Wow, really low expectations for this team...I searched the box score for "deflections" and could not find that stat...so we are now counting deflections for worthiness to start...We will be killed in the Big Ten if we are starting kids inside due to their penchant for deflections... :stop:

"We" aren't. Crean is.

Re: Deflections

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I find it hilarious that there tends to be this jump to personal offense when criticizing any part of the team...I am not saying Hanner is a horrible person just because he is just not that great at his position....Lets have some perspective. We have Holt and April sitting on the bench with scholarships..They were brought in late because they were supposed to be ready to jump right in and contribute. If that is not the case, then maybe Crean should do some evaluation of his recruiting process. Are we going to have another Jurkin or two? Holt's awesome wingspan does us no good on the bench unless we are going for most impressive clapping from the bench award....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Wow, really low expectations for this team...I searched the box score for "deflections" and could not find that stat...so we are now counting deflections for worthiness to start...We will be killed in the Big Ten if we are starting kids inside due to their penchant for deflections... :stop:

That's always been Crean's #1 go-to stat, deflections go a long way in positively affecting a game

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Gee, could not be much worse than 29 minutes , ZERO REBOUNDS, 1 turnover and 3 points for HMP....This kid was supposed to be ready to come in and help team immediately...I am not sure how he could have performed much worse than Hanner inside....

This is a legit concern, but to diminish the win because Holt didn't play is a bit much. SMU isn't a nominal team, they just cant defend perimeter oriented squads effectively yet. I still like SMU to make the tourney and this win looks nice for a March resume...with or without Holt.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Nobody is trying to diminish a win but guess what, thats what a coach will do...If I beat up a 3rd grader, I am not going to go around pretending I am Floyd Mayweather....perspective....I was simply trying to get an opinion on why the huge amount of positive info coming in about Holt before he committed and then nobody seems to be asking why he does not play in a game where obviously, if we believed the hype ( which I did), we could have used him...that's all....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Maybe cause the kid accidentally hit his friend with his car and he's not ready to play D1 b-ball yet? I really have no idea, but It could be multiple different things....

 

I agree we're going to need Holt this year and I would have loved to see him play yesterday, but it's only one game, so I'm going to wait and see on Mr Holt.

 

I do understand your concern, because we're going to need help down low. I thought HP played better than his overall stats, but he is going to have to do better hitting the boards... or we're in trouble. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I also would have liked to have seen Holt get in and get his feet wet but I completely understand why he didn't see the floor. A freshman that has been through what he's been through the past few weeks is probably best to leave on the bench in a game like last nights. You can guarantee he will get some PT in tomorrow's game and I think quite a bit of it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We didn't throw a freshman into a close game against experienced big men when he hasn't played a single minute of college basketball. I would assume we see him fairly often during the rest of the cupcake games.

 

It's concerning to me that Hoetzel is considered a better option down low at this point

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×