College Bball Thread

[OliviaPope40 6,680]

On 9/13/2018 at 8:27 AM, mdn82 said:

Figured they could help more than we could. As I said the other day. We could be talking about the Serbian National team and someone would turn it into a post about Crean.

 

Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners mobile app

 

 

I may or may not need this

[ebridges24 2,446]

2 hours ago, WayneFleekHoosier said:

Except Dakich is right. Dakich knows more about basketball than Parrish could dream about knowing.




Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners mobile app

And, Dakick was not a total failure as a coach

[AKHoosier 7,084]

2 hours ago, tyappleg said:

I just want the Script 'Indiana' font on the front of one jersey, even just for one game. Keep everything else the same. It would look so good. (And it would sell like hotcakes).

That'd be so great.  We could do alternates in a way that would make even the most traditionalist fan happy.  We could copy off of this almost directly:

 

[AKHoosier 7,084]

6 minutes ago, ebridges24 said:

And, Dakick was not a total failure as a coach

Not sure I'd call him a success though.

[ebridges24 2,446]

17 minutes ago, AKHoosier said:

Not sure I'd call him a success though.

didn't say that, just said he wasn't a total failure and he wasn't. I don't like Dan, but to call him a total failure is ridiculous. 

[GloryDays 5,941]

Arizona just landed a 5 star. As I predicted the fbi thing would blow over very quickly. Dirty recruiting is alive and well

Sent from my SM-J700T using Tapatalk

Same as it ever was.

[HoosierAloha 30,077]

What was the beef between Dakich and Parrish?


Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners

[biteoftheapple 4,115]

Parrish wrote an article slamming mid major schools for whining about not being able to schedule home and home vs power conferences. What you see is Dakich and Parrish jabbing one another.

 

 

 

 

[WayneFleekHoosier 48,850]

Would be nice if NCAA had some competent officials that could handle the game and not give so much of a home court advantage. That’s a big reason I like neutral court games because at least there you have a chance at not being jobbed.


Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners

[Brass Cannon 24,977]

ITH doing their top 25 players in the Big 10 again. No Hoosiers 21-25 or Honorable Mentions. 

I suspect Smith will come in somewhere between 16-20 judging. If not then WTF

[WayneFleekHoosier 48,850]

ITH doing their top 25 players in the Big 10 again. No Hoosiers 21-25 or Honorable Mentions. 
I suspect Smith will come in somewhere between 16-20 judging. If not then WTF

Smith is an interesting case. Has a ton to prove. Potential to be WAY up there but based on production instead of projection, it’s a difficult one.


Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners mobile app

[Stromboli 6,076]

46 minutes ago, Brass Cannon said:

ITH doing their top 25 players in the Big 10 again. No Hoosiers 21-25 or Honorable Mentions. 

I suspect Smith will come in somewhere between 16-20 judging. If not then WTF

I don't know, man. Justin is good, but he wasn't dominant. He benefitted a lot from playing with Juwan after everyone found out he was our main threat. Just because we all expect a big jump this year doesn't mean he's earned it yet.

[Stuhoo 82,204]

Agree with Stromboli:

Isaiah Roby and Zavier Simpson are on the 'just outside the top 25' list and Trent Frazier didn't make the top 20. Therefore, I can't foresee how Justin Smith deserves to be in it. 

Sure hope he finishes the season as one of the conference's top 25 though.

[Brass Cannon 24,977]

Smiths advanced analytics are better than a lot of those guys already listed. 

Not saying he’s top 20. But if he got completely left off that’s just silly.  I just worded it poorly

Although I will say these rankings always seem to ignore advanced analytics or at least heavily discount them. That’s why Morgan got snubbed last year. 

[Stuhoo 82,204]

9 minutes ago, Brass Cannon said:

Smiths advanced analytics are better than a lot of those guys already listed. 

Not saying he’s top 20. But if he got completely left off that’s just silly.  I just worded it poorly

Although I will say these rankings always seem to ignore advanced analytics or at least heavily discount them. That’s why Morgan got snubbed last year. 

 

Agreed!! You would think he'd be in the honorable mention category. 

[WayneFleekHoosier 48,850]

I think the way I’d do it, which is completely subjective, is which player would I “draft” to a CBB team. It makes Transfers and Freshman difficult but any metric would. Relies a lot on the eye test and statistics as well.


Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners

[WayneFleekHoosier 48,850]

UM hoops rankings

 

20. Wesson OSU

19. Langford MSU

18. Fernando Mary

17. Poole Mich

16. Davison Wisc

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners

 

[Stuhoo 82,204]

7 minutes ago, WayneFleekHoosier said:

UM hoops rankings

 

20. Wesson OSU

19. Langford MSU

18. Fernando Mary

17. Poole Mich

16. Davison Wisc

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners

 

 

Seems too high for Poole.

 

[Brass Cannon 24,977]

Way too high for Langford. Playing around complete studs his efg was pretty bad. 

 

[WayneFleekHoosier 48,850]

 
Seems too high for Poole.
 

Agree


Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners mobile app