Jump to content

Thanks for visiting BtownBanners.com!  We noticed you have AdBlock enabled.  While ads can be annoying, we utilize them to provide these forums free of charge to you!  Please consider removing your AdBlock for BtownBanners or consider signing up to donate and help BtownBanners stay alive!  Thank you!

Sign in to follow this  
Banksyrules

Should we really care about players being "Creaned"?

Recommended Posts

I was stating the obvious. Another obvious is it doesn't really matter what I want Crean to do or you either. My mention of his sub patterns is not some obscure realization that the rest of Hoosiernation hasn't already figured out. Remember how his sub patterns were received last year by 17,500 faithful?

All Haters!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The oversign plan.  Crean knows what he's doing with the offers, and the players and assistants are on the same page.  I don't understand the posters who perceive players to be victims of creaning when they know exactly what they're getting into.  They try to claim that the current system is "horrible" or "embarrassing" or "a shame"....or whatever.  There's a plan where everybody knows what they're getting into, and they willfully chose to agree to it.

 

In that way, it's working itself out well.

 

Results on the court?  Completely different discussion.

 

Oversigning?  It's the standard and the players aren't victims of it.

 

 

Surely you don't believe that roster management is unrelated to results on the court? The guys on the roster play on the court. I may have misunderstood your point there.

 

I've said it a bunch of times - I don't care about the players as "victims" as you state it. It doesn't bug me a bit. But please clarify who you think is aware of the "oversign plan." Are you saying that Crean, his assistants, the players who will be leaving currently on the team, and the recruits who will be replacing them are all aware and informed of this plan?

 

Or are you saying Crean only informs the recruits of his plan? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Surely you don't believe that roster management is unrelated to results on the court? The guys on the roster play on the court. I may have misunderstood your point there.

 

I've said it a bunch of times - I don't care about the players as "victims" as you state it. It doesn't bug me a bit. But please clarify who you think is aware of the "oversign plan." Are you saying that Crean, his assistants, the players who will be leaving currently on the team, and the recruits who will be replacing them are all aware, informed of this plan?

 

Or are you saying Crean only informs the recruits of his plan? 

Classic! Its a rather secretive master plan.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We only lost valuable veteran players after the 2013 season and that hurt us last year, and those players left due to graduation or to go play in the NBA. We lost zero important veteran players at the end of last year.

that is pretty disrespectful to Etherington. He was one of our toughest and smartest players and was coming off a pretty nasty injury. He will be really good for butler and will be sorely missed as an upperclassmen


Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not promising on a consensus #1 team most of the year that should have won a national championship or at least a final four with 2 of the top 4 picks in the draft and 6 1000 point career scorers(Watford, Hull, Oladipo, Zeller, Sheheey, and soon Yogi). Wow, your sophmore expectations weren't much.

Did you watch him play? He was lost and his shooting was very poor. I'm not ready to say he was going to be "a nasty senior slasher go to defender" as you stated. I'm not sure what other point you're trying to make.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We only lost valuable veteran players after the 2013 season and that hurt us last year, and those players left due to graduation or to go play in the NBA. We lost zero important veteran players at the end of last year.

and we lost Abel the year before; would have offered maturity and leadership last year: what we needed


Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

that is pretty disrespectful to Etherington. He was one of our toughest and smartest players and was coming off a pretty nasty injury. He will be really good for butler and will be sorely missed as an upperclassmen


Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners

What's disrespectful is the amount of PT and open shots he was given and didn't take. Look at what he did for us last year and tell me that he was a leader and contributor. I wish him the best and I wanted to see him succeed especially after that awful injury, but he was able to contribute.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

that is pretty disrespectful to Etherington. He was one of our toughest and smartest players and was coming off a pretty nasty injury. He will be really good for butler and will be sorely missed as an upperclassmen


Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners


That wasn't hard to be on last year's team.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

and we lost Abel the year before; would have offered maturity and leadership last year: what we needed


Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners

How do you know this? There is literally no way of proving this. Correct me if I'm wrong, but Abell also reportedly had failed a drug test. Let's not start putting our unproven players of the past who have since moved on up on a pedestal.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What's disrespectful is the amount of PT and open shots he was given and didn't take. Look at what he did for us last year and tell me that he was a leader and contributor. I wish him the best and I wanted to see him succeed especially after that awful injury, but he was able to contribute.


I was marginal on Etherington. I liked his skill and potential better than Hartman. He was athletic but HE DID pass up too many open 3's. He didn't seize his moment but he had a lot of potential and still does. Not a huge loss, but I could see him successful at Butler.

If I were to rank our losses:

1. Roth
2. Creek
3. Abell
4. Jurkin
5. Hollowell
6. Marlin
7. Patterson

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I was marginal on Etherington. I liked his skill and potential better than Hartman. He was athletic but HE DID pass up too many open 3's. He didn't seize his moment but he had a lot of potential and still does. Not a huge loss, but I could see him successful at Butler.

If I were to rank our losses:

1. Roth
2. Creek
3. Abell
4. Jurkin
5. Hollowell
6. Marlin
7. Patterson


Who am I missing?? Recent transfers that is.....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's crazy how some will be so quick to rip a current player/one that transferred but will get so defensive over a kid that hasn't even played a game here. Hot new thing, yeah!!! Misplaced loyalty


Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners

I'm not ripping anyone. Players that didn't really contribute much are being glorified to support the fault in the oversign. The real issue is Crean has recruited a lot of kids, like Etherington and Priller and all the rest, that aren't of the caliber that most want at IU. It doesn't mean that can't end up succeeding, but they are riskier recruits.

Those that have transferred had their chance to prove their worth. Those here now are either still proving it, or have yet to have the chance.

Overall, chasing more players just outside the top 100, as we've seen Crean doing a lot more of, is a better strategy for IU, in my opinion. Recruit players that are solid now, but have room to grow and who will need 3-4 year to reach their full potential. Players like Stan Robinson, Juwan Morgan, and OG are all players that fit that roster management strategy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

How do you know this? There is literally no way of proving this. Correct me if I'm wrong, but Abell also reportedly had failed a drug test. Let's not start putting our unproven players of the past who have since moved on up on a pedestal.

he was/is very well liked by everyone and got along with everyone, is well mannered and a positive person. This comes from players and coaches. That would have been a great thing to have on the team last year, especially as an upperclassmen. Those are facts and by many accounts out team was very selfish, was clicky, did not always get along and lacked leadership. Sounds like he would have been a help.


Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's crazy how some will be so quick to rip a current player/one that transferred but will get so defensive over a kid that hasn't even played a game here. Hot new thing, yeah!!! Misplaced loyalty


Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners


Am I supposed to remain loyal to those that left?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

he was/is very well liked by everyone and got along with everyone, is well mannered and a positive person. This comes from players and coaches. That would have been a great thing to have on the team last year, especially as an upperclassmen. Those are facts and by many accounts out team was very selfish, was clicky, did not always get along and lacked leadership. Sounds like he would have been a help.


Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners

Those are all great things, and once again, I really liked Abell. But I said let's not put him on a pedestal as the solution to all of our problems last year. I'm sure he could have helped a bit.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×