TTT Posted Friday at 05:58 PM Posted Friday at 05:58 PM I am sure Curt Cignetti and has staff (maybe therapist) maybe himself assigned to players to handle this idiocy to play out in the players favor same way as it applied L. Moore. There’s a $105.6 reasons why. Quote
str8baller Posted Friday at 06:24 PM Posted Friday at 06:24 PM 2 hours ago, skhoosier2 said: Deadline for the athlete attorneys was yesterday 10/8. Can’t imagine how these guys are able to fully focus knowing at any point the appellate court could issue a stay to the NCAA and they would not be able to play. I know Louis Moore said last season he played much better when he was awarded his injunction knowing that was not hanging over him anymore. Hoping this drags out through next weekend at the very least to have both available for OSU. I doubt very much it extends that long though. The longer it takes is probably better for the players. The NCAA has made their urgency known, so a quick ruling likely favors them. If they’re inclined to “split the baby” it might take a while to write the brief. Complete hypothetical, but I could see them leaving the injunction in place with regards to eligibility but overruling the trial court on the more far reaching rulings, like forcing the portal back open and enjoining the non-parties (ie the conferences). Who knows though, at this point. It’s not going to come before Nebraska, so there’s that. skhoosier2, Stuhoo and Pagoda 3 Quote
skhoosier2 Posted Friday at 06:49 PM Posted Friday at 06:49 PM 16 minutes ago, str8baller said: The longer it takes is probably better for the players. The NCAA has made their urgency known, so a quick ruling likely favors them. If they’re inclined to “split the baby” it might take a while to write the brief. Complete hypothetical, but I could see them leaving the injunction in place with regards to eligibility but overruling the trial court on the more far reaching rulings, like forcing the portal back open and enjoining the non-parties (ie the conferences). Who knows though, at this point. It’s not going to come before Nebraska, so there’s that. Agreed. My thoughts on it not dragging out come from reading (maybe there was no truth to this) that the appellate court told the trial judge to stop dragging her feet and rule on the stay. She did drag that ruling out as long as she could. A lawyer on X gave just a summary of all ongoing cases today. Someone asked about ruling on Indiana. He did say something could come down before the Nebraska game if they want to rule in favor of the NCAA and grant a stay. He said the court was still in deliberation after the players attorneys submissions. The fact that some will end up playing and others will not really lends itself to needing a federal ruling of all or nothing in regards to the 22 class. Quote
Brass Cannon Posted Friday at 06:51 PM Posted Friday at 06:51 PM I have an osu fan coworker who is 100% convinced the players will keep their eligibility till October 19th just in time to give sayin another rough day cthomas and skhoosier2 1 1 Quote
AZ Hoosier Posted Friday at 06:59 PM Posted Friday at 06:59 PM 8 minutes ago, Brass Cannon said: I have an osu fan coworker who is 100% convinced the players will keep their eligibility till October 19th just in time to give sayin another rough day Hoping for them to get the full season of eligibility restored... but I can live with Daley and Wyatt being there to harass Sayin - that works for me, too. skhoosier2 and str8baller 2 Quote
Class of '66 Old Fart Posted Friday at 09:31 PM Posted Friday at 09:31 PM Pagoda and skhoosier2 2 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.