Mark Turgeon - A Coaching Candidate? Or Not

[TheDMV 107]

1 minute ago, Chris007 said:

Why would you want to put your friend or client in a situation where they are clearly not wanted? If you think we're bad wait till you get the whole fanbase running him out of town. 

you think Vols fans were excited about Barnes at first?

[IUFB 77]

forgive me as i’ve missed a ton of pages since I last hopped on but if anyone is touting John Groce and/or Mark Turgeon as legitimate candidates, it’s just simply not true. I would just let that stuff roll off the shoulder. 

[HinnyHoosier 5,812]

Can I throw a Will Wade stick in the spokes of the Mark Turgeon wheel?

Edit: I just noticed I posted this in a designated Turgeon thread I didn't know existed until I was already in it... the hell is happening around here?

[IU Prof 1,541]

18 minutes ago, TheDMV said:

In 14 total seasons at TAMU and Maryland, Turgeon’s only season with a team worse than this year’s IU team (pre Woodson Firing) in KenPom was his first year at Maryland, which was a total rebuild. So no, you’re just straight up BS’ing here.  
 

So basically went a decade and a half without being worse even once than this current doofus leading IU. And nevermind that he never has all the resources in the world to buy whatever players he wanted. 

 

[go iu bb 7,730]

7 minutes ago, TheDMV said:

Pretty weird how when someone says they have info Stevens with the Cs isn’t a candidate, everyone yells at them and defends this as an open forum to discuss candidates and believe whatever they want. 

Brad Stevens as IU's coach is fun for some to fantasize about since he's a great coach. Mark Turgeon? lmao Not so much. 

I would also point out that in some of your other posts that merely being better than Woodson isn't the goal. That's a very low bar. Being significantly better than Woodson and all that entails (like winning games, competing for B1G titles, making it past the first weekend of the NCAAT, etc) is the goal. Mark Turgeon doesn't have that upside.

[JSHoosier 21,664]

5 minutes ago, TheDMV said:

Pretty weird how when someone says they have info Stevens with the Cs isn’t a candidate, everyone yells at them and defends this as an open forum to discuss candidates and believe whatever they want. 

I've said Stevens isn't happening, the difference is at least it's fun to think about Stevens coaching IU.

[JSHoosier 21,664]

2 minutes ago, go iu bb said:

Brad Stevens as IU's coach is fun for some to fantasize about since he's a great coach. Mark Turgeon? lmao Not so much. 

I would also point out that in some of your other posts that merely being better than Woodson isn't the goal. That's a very low bar. Being significantly better than Woodson and all that entails (like winning games, competing for B1G titles, making it past the first weekend of the NCAAT, etc) is the goal.

I can imagine the conference now.

"In hiring Mark Turgeon we have made it abundantly clear that we have no interest in the men's basketball program actually winning anything, see you all in 4 years."

[Home Jersey 12,299]

Lose the press conference. Win some basketball games. In Mark T we trust. He is inevitable.

[TheDMV 107]

2 minutes ago, Home Jersey said:

Lose the press conference. Win some basketball games. In Mark T we trust. He is inevitable.

As an outsider, I can tell you my perspective is that you guys are way too concerned with winning the press conference. 

[go iu bb 7,730]

2 minutes ago, Home Jersey said:

Lose the press conference. Win some basketball games. Lose almost as many games. In Mark T we trust. He is inevitable.

FIFY

[go iu bb 7,730]

2 minutes ago, TheDMV said:

As an outsider, I can tell you my perspective is that you guys are way too concerned with winning the press conference. 

Turgeon's winning percentage in any conference he's been in has been under 60%. So if IU were to hire him, they'd not only lose the press conference, they'd also lose a lot of games.

His NCAAT record is also less than impressive.

[Stuhoo 85,601]

Just now, TheDMV said:

As an outsider, I can tell you my perspective is that you guys are way too concerned with winning the press conference. 

Completely agree with you on that. Though it's dangerous to broad brush that narrative - there have a substantial number of posters that would be pretty happy with guys like Byington, Collins, Gates, or McCasland. And none of those guys would win the initial press release.

[Home Jersey 12,299]

Just now, TheDMV said:

As an outsider, I can tell you my perspective is that you guys are way too concerned with winning the press conference. 

Indiana fans want to win big for the first time in a long while. Basically nobody here thinks Mark T can do that. A plurality of people like guys like McCollum, Cronin etc. who would probably also not win the press conference, but feasibly could win a bunch of games. The problem with Turgeon is that after years of not coaching, it doesn’t seem very feasible he will win big here… not just that he will lose the press conference in epic fashion.

[Hoosier82 378]

 Mark Turgeon: A Viable Indiana Basketball Coaching Candidate?

Mark Turgeon has long been a recognizable name in college basketball coaching circles, with a career spanning over two decades and a track record that merits consideration for programs seeking steady leadership. As of March 2025, Turgeon remains a free agent in the coaching world following his departure from Maryland in December 2021, making him an intriguing option for teams in need of an experienced hand.

Turgeon’s coaching resume is robust. He spent 11 seasons at Maryland, where he compiled a 226-116 record, led the Terrapins to five NCAA Tournament appearances, and earned a share of the Big Ten regular-season title in 2020. Prior to Maryland, he turned Wichita State into a consistent winner, posting a 128-90 record over seven years and guiding the Shockers to an NIT title in 2011. His earlier stints at Texas A&M (2007-2011) and Jacksonville State further showcase his ability to build programs, with notable achievements including four straight NCAA Tournament berths at A&M.

What makes Turgeon an appealing candidate is his adaptability and recruiting prowess. At Maryland, he navigated the competitive Big Ten, consistently landing top talent like Jalen Smith and Anthony Cowan Jr., while maintaining a disciplined, defense-oriented style of play. His teams often reflected his emphasis on fundamentals, though critics have pointed to a lack of deep postseason success—his NCAA Tournament record stands at 6-9 across all stops, with only one Sweet 16 appearance (2010 with Texas A&M).

Since stepping away from Maryland, Turgeon has kept a low profile, reportedly taking time to recharge after a tenure marked by high expectations and occasional fan frustration. At 60 years old, he’s at an age where he could either return with renewed energy or step aside permanently. For programs considering him, Turgeon offers a proven track record and stability, though some might question whether his ceiling aligns with championship aspirations.

If a mid-major school or a Power Five program seeking a rebound hire comes calling, Turgeon’s experience could be a fit. His next move will depend on whether he’s ready to jump back into the grind—and whether athletic directors see him as the right man to lead their team forward. For now, Mark Turgeon remains a name worth watching in the coaching carousel.

Grok can write a heck of an article.  We should use it for every candidate.  

[AH1971 2,096]

18 minutes ago, go iu bb said:

Brad Stevens as IU's coach is fun for some to fantasize about since he's a great coach. Mark Turgeon? lmao Not so much. 

I would also point out that in some of your other posts that merely being better than Woodson isn't the goal. That's a very low bar. Being significantly better than Woodson and all that entails (like winning games, competing for B1G titles, making it past the first weekend of the NCAAT, etc) is the goal. Mark Turgeon doesn't have that upside.

Mark Turgeon finished top 3 in the B10 in 4/7 seasons while at Maryland and won it the year COVID cancelled the tournament. What are you talking about?

[JSHoosier 21,664]

10 minutes ago, TheDMV said:

As an outsider, I can tell you my perspective is that you guys are way too concerned with winning the press conference. 

In his coaching career he got passed the round of 32 twice, that's the same number of times he at least tied for 1st in conference.

Not only would he not win the press conference he wouldn't win anything else of note either.

[Hornsby 3,183]

God I hope not that would be as bad as bronwell.

Sent from my SM-A146U using Tapatalk

[triple 422]

This thread could just as easily/appropriately have been named Mark Tangent.  

[Silat Player 1,065]

16 minutes ago, Hoosier82 said:

 Mark Turgeon: A Viable Indiana Basketball Coaching Candidate?

Mark Turgeon has long been a recognizable name in college basketball coaching circles, with a career spanning over two decades and a track record that merits consideration for programs seeking steady leadership. As of March 2025, Turgeon remains a free agent in the coaching world following his departure from Maryland in December 2021, making him an intriguing option for teams in need of an experienced hand.

Turgeon’s coaching resume is robust. He spent 11 seasons at Maryland, where he compiled a 226-116 record, led the Terrapins to five NCAA Tournament appearances, and earned a share of the Big Ten regular-season title in 2020. Prior to Maryland, he turned Wichita State into a consistent winner, posting a 128-90 record over seven years and guiding the Shockers to an NIT title in 2011. His earlier stints at Texas A&M (2007-2011) and Jacksonville State further showcase his ability to build programs, with notable achievements including four straight NCAA Tournament berths at A&M.

What makes Turgeon an appealing candidate is his adaptability and recruiting prowess. At Maryland, he navigated the competitive Big Ten, consistently landing top talent like Jalen Smith and Anthony Cowan Jr., while maintaining a disciplined, defense-oriented style of play. His teams often reflected his emphasis on fundamentals, though critics have pointed to a lack of deep postseason success—his NCAA Tournament record stands at 6-9 across all stops, with only one Sweet 16 appearance (2010 with Texas A&M).

Since stepping away from Maryland, Turgeon has kept a low profile, reportedly taking time to recharge after a tenure marked by high expectations and occasional fan frustration. At 60 years old, he’s at an age where he could either return with renewed energy or step aside permanently. For programs considering him, Turgeon offers a proven track record and stability, though some might question whether his ceiling aligns with championship aspirations.

If a mid-major school or a Power Five program seeking a rebound hire comes calling, Turgeon’s experience could be a fit. His next move will depend on whether he’s ready to jump back into the grind—and whether athletic directors see him as the right man to lead their team forward. For now, Mark Turgeon remains a name worth watching in the coaching carousel.

Grok can write a heck of an article.  We should use it for every candidate.  

Here is ChatGPT's response to Mark Turgeon's chances. It's an AI Monday afternoon: 

[Hoosierfan2017 23,430]

32 minutes ago, JSHoosier said:

I can imagine the conference now.

"In hiring Mark Turgeon we have made it abundantly clear that we have no interest in the men's basketball program actually winning anything, see you all in 4 years."

Lose the press conference, and then lose a bunch of games - The IU Way