Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
21 minutes ago, Stuhoo said:

You could see it in the “winning” locker room after Akron.

That was the most joyless and artificial thing I’ve ever seen.

During one of our games last year, they showed one of CTA's fire-and-brimstone pregame speeches. The players were basically rolling their eyes. I thought: "This is not good." 

Posted
1 minute ago, LamarCheeks said:

During one of our games last year, they showed one of CTA's fire-and-brimstone pregame speeches. The players were basically rolling their eyes. I thought: "This is not good." 

Been the same speech for about 5 years now. It lands with a very small percentage of the roster. 

Posted
1 minute ago, Stuhoo said:

I think I mainly disagree.

IU doesn’t really have the option to hire the guy that another P5 team wants for theirs.

We've gotta be a dice-rolling program. At least get some young guy with upside.

Yeah, they’ve gotta decide what role this job is gonna serve for the candidate and are they willing to be that. Purdue hired Brohm knowing they almost certainly couldn’t keep him. Probably turned out to be worth it. And a young guy, even a dice roller, might look at this as a graveyard rather than a showcase. The alternative is finding a Terry Hoeppner who’s maybe past the point of constant upward mobility and ready to look at this as the last stop. That might be ideal, but it’s probably a tough dude to find. IU football. Boy, I don’t know. 

Posted
1 minute ago, Demo said:

The alternative is finding a Terry Hoeppner who’s maybe past the point of constant upward mobility and ready to look at this as the last stop. That might be ideal, but it’s probably a tough dude to find. IU football. Boy, I don’t know. 

No reason we can’t be Kansas and try this. Leipold might get lured away by an MSU-type, but he’s a sneaky 60 years old and very well may decide Kansas is it for him. No one will argue that it didn’t work for KU regardless of what he decides. 

Posted
2 minutes ago, Demo said:

Yeah, they’ve gotta decide what role this job is gonna serve for the candidate and are they willing to be that. Purdue hired Brohm knowing they almost certainly couldn’t keep him. Probably turned out to be worth it. And a young guy, even a dice roller, might look at this as a graveyard rather than a showcase. The alternative is finding a Terry Hoeppner who’s maybe past the point of constant upward mobility and ready to look at this as the last stop. That might be ideal, but it’s probably a tough dude to find. IU football. Boy, I don’t know. 

I have no idea if he’s up to the job, but Randle-El loves IU enough to stay even if he’s a success.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...