Jump to content

Thanks for visiting BtownBanners.com!  We noticed you have AdBlock enabled.  While ads can be annoying, we utilize them to provide these forums free of charge to you!  Please consider removing your AdBlock for BtownBanners or consider signing up to donate and help BtownBanners stay alive!  Thank you!

The Ola Depot

Mike DeBord Retiring

Recommended Posts

Lol why back up your blind hatred with facts when petty insults will do. 
Ramsey is a game manager asking him to score 30+ points a game was a flawed proposition from the start. The defense from 2 years ago wins the minny and Purdue games and one of the others. 
Dont ask a player to do something out of their scope then blame them. That would be like playing Juwan Morgan as a point then say he’s struggling because he can’t do it. 

Game managers don’t throw as many interceptions as Ramsey did this past season. DeBord was boring, but Ramsey was not of the caliber needed either.


Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners mobile app

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
They do when they are behind the whole game being asked to win the game

Listen, you’re being stubborn because you’re trying to win the argument that’s been going on with Old Friend for months now. Ramsey has plenty of flaws as does DeBord. They are a terrible combination. However, pretending like either is the sole problem is ignorant.


Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners mobile app

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, Old Friend said:

What did you possibly see out of the kid that excites you?  He has a weak arm, slow feet in the pocket, and he's inaccurate beyond 10-15 yards.  Seriously, man....Ramsey is what he is.  He's very, very average as a quarterback.  All of you that love to sling blame other directions make me question what you're watching.  Fact :  Peyton Ramsey was 93rd of 129 FBS schools in yards per attempt.  More than five yards behind the top 2 and 2 yards behind the top 20.    How you place zero blame on him for that is simply laughable.  He is captain check down. Why? Because he can''t make the throws down the field consistently.

I'm excited because I think he made good improvements from last year to this year and I expect the same next year with another offseason of training. Yes, he had a low YPA, but I believe that was more of a product of the playcalling than it was his abilities. He showed the ability to make some throws downfield when given the opportunity. 

There seems to be two basic beliefs among IU fans: either 1) the coaches didn't open up the playbook because Ramsey has a very weak arm; or 2) Ramsey has an adequate arm but couldn't really demonstrate it because of the playcalling. If Ramsey is the starting quarterback next year we're likely to find out who's right. I'm excited by the possibility of IU consistently throwing the ball downfield and seeing if Ramsey is capable. The 6 yard passes on 3rd and 8 drove me nuts. 

It also drove me nuts watching us in the shotgun every single snap, even when we were running it on 4th and 1. The style of offense we ran didn't really work with our personnel. Our defense was our calling card, yet we ran a fast tempo offense that often didn't stay on the field for long. Ramsey isn't the kind of quarterback you want throwing the ball 40+ times a game. You want him around 25 attempts a game with a strong dosage of the run. We have talented running backs so we should be able to make that happen. I'm hopeful that a new OC can come in and make these adjustments. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
33 minutes ago, Walking Boot of Doom said:


Listen, you’re being stubborn because you’re trying to win the argument that’s been going on with Old Friend for months now. Ramsey has plenty of flaws as does DeBord. They are a terrible combination. However, pretending like either is the sole problem is ignorant.


Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners mobile app

Never said they were. Don’t put words in my mouth then call me stubborn. 

But to argue the Ramsey couldn’t Trent dilfer his way to a winning record is just blind ignorance and hate

He had 3 multi interception games both were losses by 2 TDS.  The other was Minny which was only a 1 TD game because Ramsey led 3 TD drives in the 4th quarter

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Never said they were. Don’t put words in my mouth then call me stubborn. 
But to argue the Ramsey couldn’t Trent dilfer his way to a winning record is just blind ignorance and hate
He had 3 multi interception games both were losses by 2 TDS.  The other was Minny which was only a 1 TD game because Ramsey led 3 TD drives in the 4th quarter

You’ve certainly said Ramsey is not the problem and that DeBord is. If you disagree, that’s fine.

Ramsey has potential for sure. He’s also flawed. His strength became a weakness from one year to the next with a massive increase in turnovers. I’m glad we’re going to have a new OC and hopefully a new option in Penix or Tuttle.


Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners mobile app

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Walking Boot of Doom said:


You’ve certainly said Ramsey is not the problem and that DeBord is. If you disagree, that’s fine.

Ramsey has potential for sure. He’s also flawed. His strength became a weakness from one year to the next with a massive increase in turnovers. I’m glad we’re going to have a new OC and hopefully a new option in Penix or Tuttle.


Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners mobile app

I guess he’s only a problem if you think we should be shooting for more than a 7-5 or 8-4 record. Which I think is silly.  Frankly we aren’t going to keep getting guys that can go to the NFL  Gotta take what you can get.  Try to go out there with a gunslinger probably end up with a guy losing us games like our last QB

Built a good D + game manager QB = success this program hasn’t seen in ages 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I guess he’s only a problem if you think we should be shooting for more than a 7-5 or 8-4 record. Which I think is silly.  Frankly we aren’t going to keep getting guys that can go to the NFL  Gotta take what you can get.  Try to go out there with a gunslinger probably end up with a guy losing us games like our last QB
Built a good D + game manager QB = success this program hasn’t seen in ages 

I agree with that recipe, which is why Ramsey was so disappointing this year. 19 TDs and 13 INTs isn’t what I’d call managing a game.

Im excited to see what Penix and Tuttle can do. They both seem to have much higher ceilings.


Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners mobile app

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
30 minutes ago, Walking Boot of Doom said:


I agree with that recipe, which is why Ramsey was so disappointing this year. 19 TDs and 13 INTs isn’t what I’d call managing a game.

Im excited to see what Penix and Tuttle can do. They both seem to have much higher ceilings.


Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners mobile app

Any game manager is going to throw picks when you ask him to go out there and gunsling because the D gave up 35 points. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Any game manager is going to throw picks when you ask him to go out there and gunsling because the D gave up 35 points. 

DeBord’s play calling explicitly did not ask Ramsey to “gunsling”. That’s been a main point of debate around DeBord’s effectiveness as OC.

Once again, glad we’ll have new options at both OC and QB. Neither were effective last year. You’re clearly not going to change your opinion, so I’ll leave it at that.


Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners mobile app

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It seems to me that based on our current personnel, we should be looking to open the field for our best offensive weapon, Scott.

I’m no football coach, but common practice to free up a big back is to throw downfield a bit more than usual to keep safeties out of the box. Throwing frequent dink and dunk passes only squishes in the defense, and exacerbates the problem. Course ya need a receiver or two that can get downfield and a qb with arm strength to pull it off.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
It seems to me that based on our current personnel, we should be looking to open the field for our best offensive weapon, Scott.
I’m no football coach, but common practice to free up a big back is to throw downfield a bit more than usual to keep safeties out of the box. Throwing frequent dink and dunk passes only squishes in the defense, and exacerbates the problem. Course ya need a receiver or two that can get downfield and a qb with arm strength to pull it off.
 

You aren’t wrong. I think IU should try to utilize the types of things that the colts have done this year. Here is why. They have to utilize short passes because they don’t have a great O-line until proven other wise. They do need to run the football with their group of running backs, and they need to throw the ball down field to open that up. So I guess they need to be better at taking what the opposition is giving them but for that to happen the OC needs to be flexible and the QB needs to be able to make all the throws and not just 5-15 yard throws.


Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners mobile app

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Is the OC job here that attractive? I know we would love to hire a solid OC but if you were such a person and had a chance to go to a school where the HC could be on the hot seat if the team does not go to a bowl game would this be better than other options you have?

You could spin it to we are a good offense away from going bowling but if this OC is moving up because they are coveted that means they are likely trading stability for $.

This OC might also have an opportunity to go to a start up opportunity with a program bringing in a completely new staff. In this situation he likely has a few years to make the transition whereas here he may need to dramatically improve our offense in one year or we could see the entire staff let go.

I think this job has some appeal but we may find our first choices have better or more stable options.


Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

On Ramsey, I believe he is an ok qb who would make any team happy to have as their backup. I tend to believe that papaw Debo had plenty of plays called to get the ball downfield and Ramsey wouldn’t do it. Penix would come in and IMMEDIATELY look to push the ball downfield. And back to OC topic..anybody hearing anything?? It’s very quiet on the rumor front


Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, Hoosier116 said:

On Ramsey, I believe he is an ok qb who would make any team happy to have as their backup. I tend to believe that papaw Debo had plenty of plays called to get the ball downfield and Ramsey wouldn’t do it. Penix would come in and IMMEDIATELY look to push the ball downfield. And back to OC topic..anybody hearing anything?? It’s very quiet on the rumor front


Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners

Penix's yards per attempt this year was the same as Ramsey, 6.4 each.  Smaller sample size of course.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Penix's yards per attempt this year was the same as Ramsey, 6.4 each.  Smaller sample size of course.


Yeah that’s definitely something to see if that changes if penix gets more time. He also didn’t complete passes while pushing downfield so absolutely not a sure thing on penix it anything


Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners mobile app

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Hoosier116 said:

 


Yeah that’s definitely something to see if that changes if penix gets more time. He also didn’t complete passes while pushing downfield so absolutely not a sure thing on penix it anything


Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners mobile app

 

It's a much smaller sample size, but I didn't see anything to say he's a better option than Ramsey is.  His rushing numbers were maybe better but that's not what a QB needs to be able to do, if anything his passing was equal to or less than Ramsey.

His best yards/attempt was 9.4 against Florida International (10 passes), and cratered against Penn State with 4.9 in 19 attempts.  

I can't look at those and say the problem is more on Ramsey and less on DeBord.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×