HoosierAloha Posted March 21, 2018 Posted March 21, 2018 3 minutes ago, btownqb said: Please start doing 3pt shooting percentages and turnover rate as well! Morgan Smith Taylor Romeo Green Bench: Thompson, Davis, RP, Hunter, McRoberts, Durham 8 of our 11 that'll be 6'6 or taller. Nice to have height. If I get around to it. I do agree we need better guards. I believe Green and Durham improve, some. I doubt Phinisee will turn it over at the rate Newkirk did. Romeo or the UE guard would help a ton with shooting. The 6'7'' or taller definitely worked for Nevada this season. 5/7 rotation players 6'7'' Top 4 leaders in Total minutes, mpg, ppg, and total points 6'7'' Quote
CSP Posted March 21, 2018 Posted March 21, 2018 6'8 isn't some line you can just use. There plenty of ways to go around not being 6'8. I'd take Smith over hundreds of 6'8 or 6'9 guys. Idc that he is 6'6-6'7... Thompson is fine as a college big guy. ebridges24 1 Quote
CSP Posted March 21, 2018 Posted March 21, 2018 6 minutes ago, HoosierAloha said: If I get around to it. I do agree we need better guards. I believe Green and Durham improve, some. I doubt Phinisee will turn it over at the rate Newkirk did. Romeo or the UE guard would help a ton with shooting. The 6'7'' or taller definitely worked for Nevada this season. 5/7 rotation players 6'7'' Top 4 leaders in Total minutes, mpg, ppg, and total points 6'7'' Then we're good to go.. We will be bigger than them this year. We have the height we need now.. once we can stretch the floor with shooters.. let Morgan work on another teams slow footed "big guy". Quote
WayneFleekHoosier Posted March 21, 2018 Posted March 21, 2018 This whole discussion is literally about players we don't have/players we want. 1. We will agree, if we add 2 players the quality of Romeo and Taylor we will compete on a level we would like to be competing. 2. Will we add both? Or 2 guys of that quality? IDK, but using that fictitious lineup to counter Aloha's point isn't really a fair comparison. 3. I'd like to have 1 or 2 roster spots in the future dedicated to a defensive force in the paint. If Archie can prove to me we can beat like teams consistently with small ball at the 5, I'm good with that. Sent from my iPad using BtownBanners mobile app thebigweave 1 Quote
CSP Posted March 21, 2018 Posted March 21, 2018 9 minutes ago, WayneFleekHoosier said: 1. We will agree, if we add 2 players the quality of Romeo and Taylor we will compete on a level we would like to be competing. 2. Will we add both? Or 2 guys of that quality? IDK, but using that fictitious lineup to counter Aloha's point isn't really a fair comparison. 3. I'd like to have 1 or 2 roster spots in the future dedicated to a defensive force in the paint. If Archie can prove to me we can beat like teams consistently with small ball at the 5, I'm good with that. Sent from my iPad using BtownBanners mobile app He's literally doing the exact same thing. He wants Romeo or a grad transfer wing and then wants a grad transfer big for the second scholarship. I want two wings or Romeo and a combo guard. Archie has already proven he can win playing small. And.. again we wouldn't be small, just wouldn't be big. Both lineups are fictious, there's no difference in the two. Playing 3-4 guys that are 6'8, 6'8, 6'10 and maybe one that's 6'9 will be plenty big when you have the talent of Romeo, RP, Taylor, Green, and Smith to go along with it. And defensive guys like Durham and McRoberts. Jam 1 Quote
CSP Posted March 21, 2018 Posted March 21, 2018 I'd like 6'11 guys in the paint as well.. but they have to be able to defend ball screens. WayneFleekHoosier 1 Quote
mdn82 Posted March 21, 2018 Posted March 21, 2018 Please start doing 3pt shooting percentages and turnover rate as well! Morgan 30 Smith 25 Taylor 20 Romeo 30 Green 25 Bench: Thompson 10, Davis 15, RP 10, Hunter 10, McRoberts 15, Durham 10 8 of our 11 that'll be 6'6 or taller. Nice to have height and that gives the actual depth we need at each position, along with... SHOOTERS.We will never go 11 deep with Archie. Plus 6’6”? Nah, we need skilled size. Not sure of our ending turnover rate, but our 12.5 turnovers per game is not bad at all so we were for sure less than 20%. We couldn’t shoot. We have added shooters in this theory. I don’t get what a team of 6’6” guys does. There are 2 people on your list of 11 that can play the 5. 1 coming off of an Achilles. No clue how and when he comes back. He was already unathletic and slow before. Doesn’t Romeo, Taylor, and Smith (assuming sophomore jump) improve our shooting? We are assuming huge things for Smith as a big. We should really assume the same for Durham, Green, and hope that atleast 2 Freshman can come in and shoot. Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners mobile app MikeRoberts and thebigweave 2 Quote
CSP Posted March 21, 2018 Posted March 21, 2018 11 minutes ago, mdn82 said: We will never go 11 deep with Archie. Plus 6’6”? Nah, we need skilled size. Not sure of our ending turnover rate, but our 12.5 turnovers per game is not bad at all so we were for sure less than 20%. We couldn’t shoot. We have added shooters in this theory. I don’t get what a team of 6’6” guys does. There are 2 people on your list of 11 that can play the 5. 1 coming off of an Achilles. No clue how and when he comes back. He was already unathletic and slow before. Doesn’t Romeo, Taylor, and Smith (assuming sophomore jump) improve our shooting? We are assuming huge things for Smith as a big. We should really assume the same for Durham, Green, and hope that atleast 2 Freshman can come in and shoot. Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners mobile app Why is 6'8 a magical number but we disregard anybody that's 6'6 or 6'7 makes no sense. Morgan, Thompson, and Davis can all play the 5. I guess you can call it a 5 in college basketball at this point. If Moore transfers then for sure pick up a grad big guy. We don't know what Forrester will look like. From what you have seen this year wouldn't you bet on Smith being the best out of himself, Green, Durham and the FR???? Our turnovers were pathetic, as was our guard play in general. Idc about the rate. It was awful. You've been nice enough to nitpick my posts this entire time but offer very little in the way of any sort of opinion whatsoever. I want Taylor and Romeo for the last two spots. If not one of the two.. then a combo guard that plays the exact opposite of Green (at this point). If Moore or Davis transfer I want a grad big then. Ahola wants a grad big and Romeo or Taylor. Would you like offer an opinion on who you want and why? Or you can just continue to gripe at me. I honestly don't care lol Quote
HoosierAloha Posted March 21, 2018 Posted March 21, 2018 More fun with numbers, this time with the top 25! (again these numbers come from players that played ~10 mpg or more, something of rotation players) Total number of players 6'8'' or taller (4) Cincinatti (4) Clemson (4) Duke (4) North Carolina (4) West Virginia (4) Wichita State (4) Xavier (3) Arizona (3) Gonzaga (3) Kansas (3) Miami (3) Michigan (3) Purdue (3) Texas Tech (3) Villanova (2) Auburn (2) Florida (2) Indiana (2) Michigan State (2) Ohio State (2) Rhode Island (2) St. Mary's (2) Virginia (1) Houston (1) Tennessee (0) Nevada Not too bad, De'Ron going out definitely hurt as we spent half of the season with just 1. Next season, having a healthy Davis and Thompson step up would help a lot. Total games played by players 6'8'' or taller (143) Cincinnati (137) North Carolina (136) Xavier (126) West Virginia (124) Duke (121) Wichita State (111) Clemson (109) Michigan (108) Gonzaga (106) Villanova (105) Kansas (105) Purdue (102) Arizona (91) Texas Tech (85) Miami (70) Michigan State (70) St. Mary's (68) Auburn (68) Virginia (67) Florida (65) Rhode Island (62) Ohio State (46) Indiana (34) Tennessee (33) Houston (0) Nevada Lower end of the top 25. Davis going out cost us 16 games but that would still put us at the lower end. Size is an issue... Total minutes played by 6'8'' or taller players (most to least) (2938) West Virginia (2864) North Carolina (2732) Duke (2719) Gonzaga (2652) Cincinatti (2544) Kansas (2498) Purdue (2455) Arizona (2439) Villanova (2387) Michigan (2374) Xavier (2345) Clemson (2241) Wichita State (1718) Saint Mary's (1602) Miami (1584) Florida (1465) Texas Tech (1426) Michigan State (1321) Auburn (1205) Virginia (1194) Indiana (1155) Rhode Island (974) Ohio State (690) Tennessee (413) Houston (0) Nevada Minutes per game by players 6'8'' or taller (most to least) (95.1) West Virginia (88.4) Clemson (86.4) Duke (86.1) North Carolina (75.5) Gonzaga (74.2) Wichita State (74) Cincinatti (72.6) Kansas (71.8) Purdue (71) Arizona (69.8) Xavier (69.4) Villanova (66) Michigan (55.2) Miami (50.1) Texas Tech (49.1) Saint Mary's (48.2) Indiana (47.2) Florida (40.7) Michigan State (38.9) Auburn (35.6) Rhode Island (35.4) Virginia (30.8) Ohio State (20.3) Tennessee (12.5) Houston (0) Nevada Not bad but that includes Davis' minutes. We need more bigs. Points per game by players 6'8'' or taller (42.3) Duke (39.2) North Carolina (37.9) Gonzaga (37.4) Wichita State (36) West Virginia (34.6) Arizona (34.2) Purdue (32.2) Kansas (31.8) Clemson (31.8) Xavier (29.9) Cincinnati (27.3) Michigan (26.4) Saint Mary's (26.1) Indiana (24.1) Villanova (23.3) Michigan State (19.7) Miami (15.5) Texas Tech (15) Rhode Island (14.3) Ohio State (13.6) Florida (12.2) Auburn (8.8) Virginia (5.6) Tennessee (4.2) Houston (0) Nevada Midpack, not bad but again that include Davis' ppg that wasn't there for half of the season. Morgan was huge this season and could be even better next season, if he's protected by another big. Total points by players 6'8'' or taller (1365) Gonzaga (1349) Duke (1315) North Carolina (1205) Arizona (1186) Purdue (1138) Wichita State (1120) Kansas (1108) West Virginia (1086) Xavier (1073) Cincinnati (985) Michigan (924) Saint Mary's (846) Villanova (835) Clemson (817) Michigan State (656) Indiana (594) Miami (492) Rhode Island (458) Florida (458) Texas Tech (456) Ohio State (415) Auburn (299) Virginia (192) Tennessee (139) Houston (0) Nevada Throw another 150ish for Davis production that he couldn't contribute the second half of the season. Hopefully, Davis can return to play to the level he did last season (294ish total points) and Thompson can contribute 5 or 6 ppg. I believe we need a grad transfer big that can split 30-35 minutes with Davis at the 5. IUsafety, thebigweave and chicagoHOOSIER 2 1 Quote
CSP Posted March 21, 2018 Posted March 21, 2018 7 minutes ago, HoosierAloha said: More fun with numbers, this time with the top 25! (again these numbers come from players that played ~10 mpg or more, something of rotation players) Total number of players 6'8'' or taller (4) Cincinatti (4) Clemson (4) Duke (4) North Carolina (4) West Virginia (4) Wichita State (4) Xavier (3) Arizona (3) Gonzaga (3) Kansas (3) Miami (3) Michigan (3) Purdue (3) Texas Tech (3) Villanova (2) Auburn (2) Florida (2) Indiana (2) Michigan State (2) Ohio State (2) Rhode Island (2) St. Mary's (2) Virginia (1) Houston (1) Tennessee (0) Nevada Not too bad, De'Ron going out definitely hurt as we spent half of the season with just 1. Next season, having a healthy Davis and Thompson step up would help a lot. Total games played by players 6'8'' or taller (143) Cincinnati (137) North Carolina (136) Xavier (126) West Virginia (124) Duke (121) Wichita State (111) Clemson (109) Michigan (108) Gonzaga (106) Villanova (105) Kansas (105) Purdue (102) Arizona (91) Texas Tech (85) Miami (70) Michigan State (70) St. Mary's (68) Auburn (68) Virginia (67) Florida (65) Rhode Island (62) Ohio State (46) Indiana (34) Tennessee (33) Houston (0) Nevada Lower end of the top 25. Davis going out cost us 16 games but that would still put us at the lower end. Size is an issue... Total minutes played by 6'8'' or taller players (most to least) (2938) West Virginia (2864) North Carolina (2732) Duke (2719) Gonzaga (2652) Cincinatti (2544) Kansas (2498) Purdue (2455) Arizona (2439) Villanova (2387) Michigan (2374) Xavier (2345) Clemson (2241) Wichita State (1718) Saint Mary's (1602) Miami (1584) Florida (1465) Texas Tech (1426) Michigan State (1321) Auburn (1205) Virginia (1194) Indiana (1155) Rhode Island (974) Ohio State (690) Tennessee (413) Houston (0) Nevada Minutes per game by players 6'8'' or taller (most to least) (95.1) West Virginia (88.4) Clemson (86.4) Duke (86.1) North Carolina (75.5) Gonzaga (74.2) Wichita State (74) Cincinatti (72.6) Kansas (71.8) Purdue (71) Arizona (69.8) Xavier (69.4) Villanova (66) Michigan (55.2) Miami (50.1) Texas Tech (49.1) Saint Mary's (48.2) Indiana (47.2) Florida (40.7) Michigan State (38.9) Auburn (35.6) Rhode Island (35.4) Virginia (30.8) Ohio State (20.3) Tennessee (12.5) Houston (0) Nevada Not bad but that includes Davis' minutes. We need more bigs. Points per game by players 6'8'' or taller (42.3) Duke (39.2) North Carolina (37.9) Gonzaga (37.4) Wichita State (36) West Virginia (34.6) Arizona (34.2) Purdue (32.2) Kansas (31.8) Clemson (31.8) Xavier (29.9) Cincinnati (27.3) Michigan (26.4) Saint Mary's (26.1) Indiana (24.1) Villanova (23.3) Michigan State (19.7) Miami (15.5) Texas Tech (15) Rhode Island (14.3) Ohio State (13.6) Florida (12.2) Auburn (8.8) Virginia (5.6) Tennessee (4.2) Houston (0) Nevada Midpack, not bad but again that include Davis' ppg that wasn't there for half of the season. Morgan was huge this season and could be even better next season, if he's protected by another big. Total points by players 6'8'' or taller (1365) Gonzaga (1349) Duke (1315) North Carolina (1205) Arizona (1186) Purdue (1138) Wichita State (1120) Kansas (1108) West Virginia (1086) Xavier (1073) Cincinnati (985) Michigan (924) Saint Mary's (846) Villanova (835) Clemson (817) Michigan State (656) Indiana (594) Miami (492) Rhode Island (458) Florida (458) Texas Tech (456) Ohio State (415) Auburn (299) Virginia (192) Tennessee (139) Houston (0) Nevada Throw another 150ish for Davis production that he couldn't contribute the second half of the season. Hopefully, Davis can return to play to the level he did last season (294ish total points) and Thompson can contribute 5 or 6 ppg. I believe we need a grad transfer big that can split 30-35 minutes with Davis at the 5. Inserting Thompson puts us nearly midpack in all of these stats. Again.. We won't be big, we won't be small. Quote
HoosierAloha Posted March 21, 2018 Posted March 21, 2018 1 hour ago, btownqb said: Please start doing 3pt shooting percentages and turnover rate as well! Morgan 30 Smith 25 Taylor 20 Romeo 30 Green 25 Bench: Thompson 10, Davis 15, RP 10, Hunter 10, McRoberts 15, Durham 10 8 of our 11 that'll be 6'6 or taller. Nice to have height and that gives the actual depth we need at each position, along with... SHOOTERS. 17 minutes ago, btownqb said: Why is 6'8 a magical number but we disregard anybody that's 6'6 or 6'7 makes no sense. Morgan, Thompson, and Davis can all play the 5. I guess you can call it a 5 in college basketball at this point. If Moore transfers then for sure pick up a grad big guy. We don't know what Forrester will look like. From what you have seen this year wouldn't you bet on Smith being the best out of himself, Green, Durham and the FR???? Our turnovers were pathetic, as was our guard play in general. Idc about the rate. It was awful. You've been nice enough to nitpick my posts this entire time but offer very little in the way of any sort of opinion whatsoever. I want Taylor and Romeo for the last two spots. If not one of the two.. then a combo guard that plays the exact opposite of Green (at this point). If Moore or Davis transfer I want a grad big then. Ahola wants a grad big and Romeo or Taylor. Would you like offer an opinion on who you want and why? Or you can just continue to gripe at me. I honestly don't care lol You do or don't care about turnover rate? 6'8'' was some magical number I pulled out of the air for this exercise. It was argued earlier in the thread about height and I chose 6'8'' so I could include Morgan. If we wanted to go a little taller the numbers would look a little worse for IU. If we wanted to go smaller to 6'6'' or 6'7'' IU would be towards the bottom of every category when compared to the top 25. 6'8'' doesn't automatically make you a good post player. I'd take a shorter player with a longer reach and wingspan. However, re: IU post next season we need someone else to protect Morgan. Freddie did a bang up job this season but he was extremely limited. Davis is coming back from a major injury that will most likely hamper his athleticism even more. I'm sorry but Smith won't be able to hold his own against other 5s. Thompson will get some run but again we are severely limiting our potential if we're expecting Morgan and Smith to get more of the minutes at the 4 and 5. I don't care if we have Romeo and the UE guard we're not going far with them in the post. We'll need more (Moore could definitely help if he was better). Quote
CSP Posted March 21, 2018 Posted March 21, 2018 1 minute ago, HoosierAloha said: You do or don't care about turnover rate? 6'8'' was some magical number I pulled out of the air for this exercise. It was argued earlier in the thread about height and I chose 6'8'' so I could include Morgan. If we wanted to go a little taller the numbers would look a little worse for IU. If we wanted to go smaller to 6'6'' or 6'7'' IU would be towards the bottom of every category when compared to the top 25. 6'8'' doesn't automatically make you a good post player. I'd take a shorter player with a longer reach and wingspan. However, re: IU post next season we need someone else to protect Morgan. Freddie did a bang up job this season but he was extremely limited. Davis is coming back from a major injury that will most likely hamper his athleticism even more. I'm sorry but Smith won't be able to hold his own against other 5s. Thompson will get some run but again we are severely limiting our potential if we're expecting Morgan and Smith to get more of the minutes at the 4 and 5. I don't care if we have Romeo and the UE guard we're not going far with them in the post. We'll need more (Moore could definitely help if he was better). Shouldn't have said turnover rate the first time. I misspoke. My apologies. And you're proving my point here.. you keep talking about the post... the post is irrelevant. Morgan gets some points there.. no one else needs to unless it's a cut off dribble drive or an off reb. Ball screens, dribble drive, running in transition. We don't need any more height, especially when you compare it to how much we need shooting/ball handling/depth on the wing. Quote
CSP Posted March 21, 2018 Posted March 21, 2018 I've said my piece. I have stated my opinion.. over and over. I'm out. Quote
mdn82 Posted March 21, 2018 Posted March 21, 2018 Why is 6'8 a magical number but we disregard anybody that's 6'6 or 6'7 makes no sense. Morgan, Thompson, and Davis can all play the 5. I guess you can call it a 5 in college basketball at this point. If Moore transfers then for sure pick up a grad big guy. We don't know what Forrester will look like. From what you have seen this year wouldn't you bet on Smith being the best out of himself, Green, Durham and the FR???? Our turnovers were pathetic, as was our guard play in general. Idc about the rate. It was awful. You've been nice enough to nitpick my posts this entire time but offer very little in the way of any sort of opinion whatsoever. I want Taylor and Romeo for the last two spots. If not one of the two.. then a combo guard that plays the exact opposite of Green (at this point). If Moore or Davis transfer I want a grad big then. Ahola wants a grad big and Romeo or Taylor. Would you like offer an opinion on who you want and why? Or you can just continue to gripe at me. I honestly don't care lolBtown I like you and always have but man this is a weak complaint. Don’t make a strong stance when you know there will be opposing thoughts if you can’t take it. Why is it when someone responds to people anymore do they instantly think people are attacking? Are we that thin skinned on this board anymore? I fully expect people to pick apart my posts after everyone complained about the moderation on this board just a year ago. I wouldn’t complain like you did in that post and finish with “I don’t care” because obviously you do [emoji6].That said, I like Tariq Owens out of St Johns. 6’11” and 205 lbs. Getting 8 points, 5 boards, and 3 blocks per game while averaging 30 mpg. I like that length. I like his shooting percentage. Unfortunately he will end up at Maryland. They have been talking about him for a couple weeks on Maryland board. Also Archie won’t go above a 9 man rotation and I see a couple of transfers. A new coach just doesn’t come in and skate this clean. Please, nitpick that. This is kind of what this is about. It’s a good discussion and I don’t for the life of me understand taking offense to other people’s opinions, when yours is that strong. Also, we should start to see more transfers in the next week or two from other programs. Your list and mine will probably change a couple of times before anything happens. Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners mobile app WayneFleekHoosier, MikeRoberts and HoosierAloha 3 Quote
WayneFleekHoosier Posted March 21, 2018 Posted March 21, 2018 My hockey tournament weekend I just participated in has always been a weekend that I read about a couple transfers (historically)Interesting things are slow on this front. I do expect 1 or 2. Thinking by this weekend we will hear some news. Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners mdn82 1 Quote
CSP Posted March 21, 2018 Posted March 21, 2018 8 minutes ago, mdn82 said: Btown I like you and always have but man this is a weak complaint. Don’t make a strong stance when you know there will be opposing thoughts if you can’t take it. Why is it when someone responds to people anymore do they instantly think people are attacking? Are we that thin skinned on this board anymore? I fully expect people to pick apart my posts after everyone complained about the moderation on this board just a year ago. I wouldn’t complain like you did in that post and finish with “I don’t care” because obviously you do . That said, I like Tariq Owens out of St Johns. 6’11” and 205 lbs. Getting 8 points, 5 boards, and 3 blocks per game while averaging 30 mpg. I like that length. I like his shooting percentage. Unfortunately he will end up at Maryland. They have been talking about him for a couple weeks on Maryland board. Also Archie won’t go above a 9 man rotation and I see a couple of transfers. A new coach just doesn’t come in and skate this clean. Please, nitpick that. This is kind of what this is about. It’s a good discussion and I don’t for the life of me understand taking offense to other people’s opinions, when yours is that strong. Also, we should start to see more transfers in the next week or two from other programs. Your list and mine will probably change a couple of times before anything happens. Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners mobile app There's just no sense in nitpicking someone's posts constantly if you never offer an opinion yourself. Pretty much defeats the purpose of a discussion. So you want size.. that guy certainly has some size to him. I'd be about the last person that would be catergoized as thin skinned. I never said you were attacking me. Quote
mdn82 Posted March 21, 2018 Posted March 21, 2018 My hockey tournament weekend I just participated in has always been a weekend that I read about a couple transfers (historically) Interesting things are slow on this front. I do expect 1 or 2. Thinking by this weekend we will hear some news. Sent from my iPhone using BtownBannersAgreed. I would be shocked if he skated clean. Crean would go 10+ deep. Archie will never do that. I anticipate a couple of players haven’t got what they think they deserve. The success from now and until next season will be measured by if we get Romeo. The grad transfer thing is just improving his surroundings. Hopefully we can. We need a lot and it will balance out classes. Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners mobile app Quote
mdn82 Posted March 21, 2018 Posted March 21, 2018 There's just no sense in nitpicking someone's posts constantly if you never offer an opinion yourself. Pretty much defeats the purpose of a discussion. So you want size.. that guy certainly has some size to him. I'd be about the last person that would be catergoized as thin skinned. I never said you were attacking me. I have told you what I wanted. You didn’t like that and repeatedly said so. Only about half of the transfers are known. How can I name a player that may not be there yet? I can describe a type of player I want which I have a number of times and again you didn’t like that. My opinion was as descriptive as yours man. It’s ok if we don’t agree on this. Don’t take it so personally. Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners mobile app HoosierAloha and thebigweave 2 Quote
CSP Posted March 21, 2018 Posted March 21, 2018 14 minutes ago, mdn82 said: I have told you what I wanted. You didn’t like that and repeatedly said so. Only about half of the transfers are known. How can I name a player that may not be there yet? I can describe a type of player I want which I have a number of times and again you didn’t like that. My opinion was as descriptive as yours man. It’s ok if we don’t agree on this. Don’t take it so personally. Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners mobile app Again.. I didn't take it personally. Until your last post I never saw you state you wanted a big guy. Truly have no clue where you're coming with any of this. You can pretend I'm upset when I'm not, I guess. Quote
Brass Cannon Posted March 21, 2018 Author Posted March 21, 2018 Judging by Archie's recruitment strategy he's rather satisfied with out big rotation next year. Definitely looks to be trying to improve perimeter shooting. Im gonna have faith and I'm gonna expect next year to be a little rocky regardless of getting Romeo or not. HoosierAloha, mdn82 and WayneFleekHoosier 3 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.