Stuhoo Posted February 13, 2017 Posted February 13, 2017 Yup. In a nutshell, I want a clean program that is in the conversation. SteelerHoosier, hsrtxp, Class of '66 Old Fart and 2 others 5 Quote
yogisballin Posted February 13, 2017 Posted February 13, 2017 Here are some not so, surprising numbers. This is our amount of TO's/AST and rank of each of those dating back to the 2088-09 season. I guess the season that surprised me the most would be the 14-15 season. 08-09...542to(325th) 364ast(263rd) 09-10...486to(289th) 375ast(245th) 10-11...415to(126th) 393ast(208th) 11-12...463to(245th) 487ast(49th) 13-14...482to(336th) 368ast(259th) 14-15...392to(129th) 473ast(66th) 15-16...470to(319th) 560ast(19th) 16-17thus far 394to(325th) 374ast(104th) LIHoosier 1 Quote
SteelerHoosier Posted February 13, 2017 Posted February 13, 2017 On 2/13/2017 at 7:12 AM, Stuhoo said: Yup. In a nutshell, I want a clean program that is in the conversation. That is what really bugs me about the apologists. They act like those who want Crean and IU to move on expect FF and NC banners to be hung every year. No one with a brain thinks that. That is so unrealistic. We obviously know that are years where we simply aren't going to be as good as the other big dogs, but that doesn't mean we can't have a program that consistently finishes in the top 4 of the conference and is consistently a threat to make a run. We get that there will be a year here or there where we get bounced early in the tourney because of an upset. **** happens in one game formats, but we also know that we have a chance of making a run even in years where the talent isn't as deep because the team will improve as the season progresses. That is all I want. Consistency. I can't handle the peaks and valleys anymore. We shouldn't have to rely on NBA talent just making great individual plays to be consistent in this conference. pappy1865, Stuhoo and weaverswonders6 3 Quote
Brass Cannon Posted February 13, 2017 Posted February 13, 2017 10 hours ago, Old Friend said: Correct. And I've said that for a couple of years. When Bob Knight was let go, people said the game had passed him by. Time to go. Blah, blah. With his worst teams. When he had truly quit caring about recruiting. From 1994 until he was fired in 2000, he STILL finished higher than 4th four times. Crean's done it twice in his career; and we're supposed to think that's okay?? I got into it a couple of years ago with one of the holier than thou folks on the Scout site about Bo Ryan and Wisconsin. His argument was we don't want to be Wisconsin, they never win titles. I said then and I'll say NOW that if Indiana is in the conversation every year, our fans will be happy, and we'll do just fine compared to Wisconsin because we'll always (with the right coach) be able to attract better talent. Bo Ryan never finished BELOW 4th in the Big Ten. Crean is 4-18 vs. Wisconsin. Are we Indiana or...not? Fred? Mr. McRobbie? We have beaten Wisconsin 4 times. That's shocking which is sad beyond belief. ALASKA HOOSIER 1 Quote
Uspshoosier Posted February 13, 2017 Posted February 13, 2017 We have beaten Wisconsin 4 times. That's shocking which is sad beyond belief. Nope only twice at IU that is including his days at Marquette. Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners Quote
Brass Cannon Posted February 13, 2017 Posted February 13, 2017 48 minutes ago, Uspshoosier said: Nope only twice at IU that is including his days at Marquette. Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners Yeah that makes more sense What a sick joke. Pretty sad we could offer an incentive to our next coach 250000 for every big ten team you have a winning record against after 5 years. 500000 for Purdue hsrtxp 1 Quote
BtownBanner6 Posted February 13, 2017 Posted February 13, 2017 Here are some not so, surprising numbers. This is our amount of TO's/AST and rank of each of those dating back to the 2088-09 season. I guess the season that surprised me the most would be the 14-15 season. 08-09...542to(325th) 364ast(263rd) 09-10...486to(289th) 375ast(245th) 10-11...415to(126th) 393ast(208th) 11-12...463to(245th) 487ast(49th) 13-14...482to(336th) 368ast(259th) 14-15...392to(129th) 473ast(66th) 15-16...470to(319th) 560ast(19th) 16-17thus far 394to(325th) 374ast(104th) What happened to 12-13? Quote
LIHoosier Posted February 13, 2017 Posted February 13, 2017 35 minutes ago, BtownBanner6 said: What happened to 12-13? 468 TO's (267th) to 514 ast (39th) Quote
Brass Cannon Posted February 13, 2017 Posted February 13, 2017 Who would have thought valuing the ball and helping your teammates was beneficial. Quote
TheWatShot Posted February 13, 2017 Author Posted February 13, 2017 Just updated my original post. Our RPI dropped all the way to 93 after yesterday's game. lol Class of '66 Old Fart and ALASKA HOOSIER 2 Quote
yogisballin Posted February 13, 2017 Posted February 13, 2017 30 minutes ago, Brass Cannon said: Who would have thought valuing the ball and helping your teammates was beneficial. rrrright Quote
JSHoosier Posted February 13, 2017 Posted February 13, 2017 44 minutes ago, Brass Cannon said: Who would have thought valuing the ball and helping your teammates was beneficial. Crazy talk. More street ball, we need more street ball. johnsoniu and Class of '66 Old Fart 2 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.