Jump to content

Thanks for visiting BtownBanners.com!  We noticed you have AdBlock enabled.  While ads can be annoying, we utilize them to provide these forums free of charge to you!  Please consider removing your AdBlock for BtownBanners or consider signing up to donate and help BtownBanners stay alive!  Thank you!

BlueDevil

College Bball Thread

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Uspshoosier said:

Not much longer before I get to fill this out

Where is IU going to end up on this board 

 

79AEB430-716A-46E8-AF8E-2A52BF58A590.jpeg

Better question, hypothetically, let's say Louisville had won today, went on a wild run and won the ACC tourney... Where would the committee have seeded them?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, LIHoosier said:

Wilmington lead Charleston 27-24 at half. Fugly shooting from both sides.

lol Roy Hibbert is in the CBS-SN studio

He is about as good as Selvin Mack lol.   CBS usually puts them on here during the week when no one is watching.   CBS SN is usually a guarantee spot on a muted tv in the college basketball room 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Loaded Chicken Sandwich said:

Better question, hypothetically, let's say Louisville had won today, went on a wild run and won the ACC tourney... Where would the committee have seeded them?

Since they would have won the tourney and got the auto bid they can’t send them to  Dayton for the first 4 games.     Winning it also means winning 5 games against against ACC competition.    I would guess 14 seed range in that hypothetical 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, Uspshoosier said:

Since they would have won the tourney and got the auto bid they can’t send them to  Dayton for the first 4 games.     Winning it also means winning 5 games against against ACC competition.    I would guess 14 seed range in that hypothetical 

So why couldn't they send Louisville to the first 4 but 16 seeds who win their conference tourneys get sent? 

 

IMO, the first 4 should be the 11 and 12 seeds only and the last 8 at larges only. Just my opinion though. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, Loaded Chicken Sandwich said:

So why couldn't they send Louisville to the first 4 but 16 seeds who win their conference tourneys get sent? 

 

IMO, the first 4 should be the 11 and 12 seeds only and the last 8 at larges only. Just my opinion though. 

I guess technically they could send them as one io the last seeded  teams   but if they won 5 straight ACC games then there would be no chance on the true seed list they would be that far down.    First 4 is the last 4 teams on the seed list 65-68 and the last 4 at-large teams 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, Loaded Chicken Sandwich said:

So why couldn't they send Louisville to the first 4 but 16 seeds who win their conference tourneys get sent? 

 

IMO, the first 4 should be the 11 and 12 seeds only and the last 8 at larges only. Just my opinion though. 

Hot take:  teams that are 16 seeds that get the play in game actually don't mind it.  Unless something very strange happens (think it's happened only once), 16 seeds aren't going to win a game UNLESS they are in the play in game.  Get in the play in game as a 16 seed and you're the only college game on at the time.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, Loaded Chicken Sandwich said:

So why couldn't they send Louisville to the first 4 but 16 seeds who win their conference tourneys get sent? 

 

IMO, the first 4 should be the 11 and 12 seeds only and the last 8 at larges only. Just my opinion though. 

Agree on the first 4 being the last 8 at-large teams but you know who doesn’t want that.   The commissioners and athletic directors and coaches of the smaller conferences that get sent to the first 4.    The winner goes in the history books as a win in the ncaa tournament for that school and that’s a unit for the conference and schools.  More  Money for the conferences that would otherwise get destroyed by a 1 seed.  Plus for me my wife and I enjoy those 16 seeded games at the first 4 when we go.  Always fun getting caught up in the atmosphere between 2 small teams and fan bases in their Super Bowl 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, Uspshoosier said:

I guess technically they could send them as one of  the last seeded  teams   but if they won 5 straight ACC games then there would be no chance on the true seed list they would be that far down.    First 4 is the last 4 teams on the seed list 65-68 and the last 4 at-large teams 

I just looked at NET and there are several conferences that don't have a single Quad 1 win where Uof6 would hypothetically have added 3. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Uspshoosier said:

Agree on the first 4 being the last 8 at-large teams but you know who doesn’t want that.   The commissioners and athletic directors and coaches of the smaller conferences that get sent to the first 4.    The winner goes in the history books as a win in the ncaa tournament for that school and that’s a unit for the conference and schools.  More  Money for the conferences that would otherwise get destroyed by a 1 seed.  Plus for me my wife and I enjoy those 16 seeded games at the first 4 when we go.  Always fun getting caught up in the atmosphere between 2 small teams and fan bases in their Super Bowl 

Sorry to quote you again. The NCAA should really add a second site for the first four games that get sent out west. Keep Dayton for the east/midwest regions and have another similar school/arena in Texas for the south/west. Still bitter about IU winning in Dayton then going 2,000 miles west for a game that tipped right after they landed.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Uspshoosier said:

I guess technically they could send them as on if the last seeded  teams   but if they won 5 straight ACC games then there would be no chance on the true seed list they would be that far down.    First 4 is the last 4 teams on the seed list 65-68 and the last 4 at-large teams 

One thing I always wondered was when Georgetown won the 2020-21 Big East tournament, they were seeded at 12, which put them below all the at large bids but on the top line with the auto bids.  But it did seem to me that there were a couple of 13 seeded auto bids that had better resumes (Liberty, North Texas).  Kind of wondered if the NCAA committee basically slotted that 12 seed spot for an at large team OR Georgetown if Georgetown won.  I know you've said they really don't look at Saturday/Sunday games, so I wonder if a power 5 conference champion is one that potentially wouldn't have been invited if they just seed them where the last at large team would be just in case they do win their tournament.  It might keep them from needing to shift other things.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, LIHoosier said:

Sorry to quote you again. The NCAA should really add a second site for the first four games that get sent out west. Keep Dayton for the east/midwest regions and have another similar school/arena in Texas for the south/west. Still bitter about IU winning in Dayton then going 2,000 miles west for a game that tipped right after they landed.

I wouldn’t like that since I go to Dayton every year to watch the First 4 but it definitely would make a lot of sense to do that 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Uspshoosier said:

15-0 run for UNCW and they are up 7.   Charleston is in trouble.  9:26 to go 

IF Charleston loses.....are they at large worthy?  I know no team with 29 wins over D1 competition has ever been excluded but I also know their schedule.....oof.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×