Jump to content

Thanks for visiting BtownBanners.com!  We noticed you have AdBlock enabled.  While ads can be annoying, we utilize them to provide these forums free of charge to you!  Please consider removing your AdBlock for BtownBanners or consider signing up to donate and help BtownBanners stay alive!  Thank you!

Sign in to follow this  
Buck Naked

What's the deal with these drug test rumors?

Recommended Posts

The only thing I am saying, I would be shocked if by Crean's actions and words post game about Jeremy needing to get his head right, he didn't do something along these lines.  We know its not academic, or Crean wouldn't have a say.  Crean would never sit a starter for a whole game that was close to prove a point.  This is Crean we are talking about.  Bobby Knight?  Ok.  Crean.  Not a chance.  I believe he would do something like this if it wasn't basketball related.  If it was University related he would have to disclose that.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The only thing I am saying, I would be shocked if by Crean's actions and words post game about Jeremy needing to get his head right, he didn't do something along these lines.  We know its not academic, or Crean wouldn't have a say.  Crean would never sit a starter for a whole game that was close to prove a point.  This is Crean we are talking about.  Bobby Knight?  Ok.  Crean.  Not a chance.  I believe he would do something like this if it wasn't basketball related.  If it was University related he would have to disclose that.  

My one thing is JH was never listed by the poster who mentioned the failed drug test. Davis was, and he got in the game, even if it was for 2 minutes. If that is true I think most of us would have some big issues with Crean playing any one of the three any minutes, or even having them dressing and ready to go if they were needed

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My one thing is JH was never listed by the poster who mentioned the failed drug test. Davis was, and he got in the game, even if it was for 2 minutes. If that is true I think most of us would have some big issues with Crean playing any one of the three any minutes, or even having them dressing and ready to go if they were needed

Well, we definitely don't want to see a repeat of the He Who Shall Not Be Named teams. Puff, Puff, Pass is not a play that should be drawn up on the locker room whiteboard. If this rumor is true, than playing any one of the three would make any "punishment" a joke. However, lets remember that there is only one anonymous third (or fourth) hand source for this information anyway. That JH was even even involved in this alleged activity is merely being extrapolated from the rumor, that he didn't play, and CTC's vague comment after the game. It would seem to add smoke to the rumor, but its conjecture at this point.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Haven't heard this rumor anywhere but the game thread. Not saying it is true or untrue, but there seems to be a few holes in the rumor. I did see JH's high school coach has spoke, briefly, about the situation. Crean contacted him before the game to inform him of the situation. He is selling the needed to get focused line, as well.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[quote name="Ryno6284" post="29279" timestamp="1389477141"]I'm pissed that Fisch didn't ask CTC anything about JH on the postgame interview.[/quote]

I know how could that question not come up, ever since the starters were announced I was wondering what the deal was. At first I thought Crean wanted more leadership in the starting lineup and went with Evan, then these rumors came up. I hope that they are just rumors,


Sent from my fingertips using BtownBanners

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes he does, but this move is unprecedented in Crean's Tenure. 2 minutes for DD?? 

 

DD was the one elbowed during the play that was reviewed. And didn't return. Maybe that blow was instrumental in him not returning.

 

 

I suppose I hope it is him. I'd hate for people to be tossing his name around if it wasn't......

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, we definitely don't want to see a repeat of the He Who Shall Not Be Named teams. Puff, Puff, Pass is not a play that should be drawn up on the locker room whiteboard. If this rumor is true, than playing any one of the three would make any "punishment" a joke. However, lets remember that there is only one anonymous third (or fourth) hand source for this information anyway. That JH was even even involved in this alleged activity is merely being extrapolated from the rumor, that he didn't play, and CTC's vague comment after the game. It would seem to add smoke to the rumor, but its conjecture at this point.

 

See I disagree with this whole rumor for one simple fact about Crean's coaching.  Crean wouldn't draw up puff, puff, pass.  He would draw up puff, puff, f***ing turnover. 

 

Edit:  This was mean and a low blow ^^^^

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[quote name="mdn82" post="29462" timestamp="1389565028"]See I disagree with this whole rumor for one simple fact about Crean's coaching. Crean wouldn't draw up puff, puff, pass. He would draw up puff, puff, f***ing turnover.

Edit: This was mean and a low blow ^^^^[/quote]

Puff puff turnover was prolly right. Prolly got hungry and went to Arby's.


Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

When I was watching the game, I thought maybe JH was injured.  Then I remember hearing Fisch in the pre-game talking about how healthy this team is right now.  Then I thought, man, CTC is proving one hell of a point to JH.  Then the game ended and the warm-ups were still on and had almost forgot that JH never even made it in the game.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

http://scoop.hoosiershq.com/2014/01/shelt-hollowells-benching-could-be-long-term-thing/

 

 

“He called me and said ‘we’re having some focus issues with Jeremy,’” Shelt said by phone Sunday evening. “‘We’re going to sit him down. It could be a long-term thing, but we’re going to work through it.’ … I really appreciated him calling to tell me that.”

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

He will probably start Tuesday against Wisky!

NO!!! lol we dont want that, but with these sub patterns it wouldnt matter who starts or plays, because before it Johnny marlin, andrew calomeris will be in when the score is 70- 68 IU with 2 minutes to go

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

NO!!! lol we dont want that, but with these sub patterns it wouldnt matter who starts or plays, because before it Johnny marlin, andrew calomeris will be in when the score is 70- 68 IU with 2 minutes to go

Seemed better this weekend. No full line changes that I recall, starters played the first 4 mintues without any subs. I haven't looked at a boxscore but it seemed like we only had about 8 guys getting minutes (starting 5, Austin, & Stan)... with Hanner spelling Noah... I know DD got a few and Howard got a few but overall I was much happier with the lineups and spans this weekend. And it comes out with a W so hopefully CTC learned something from this game as he said the players did.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×