Jump to content

Thanks for visiting BtownBanners.com!  We noticed you have AdBlock enabled.  While ads can be annoying, we utilize them to provide these forums free of charge to you!  Please consider removing your AdBlock for BtownBanners or consider signing up to donate and help BtownBanners stay alive!  Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Woodson ain't going to be around for 15 years.  That the beauty of the hire.  Get and experienced coach, former player loved by most, and set a foundation.  Once the foundation is set -- he retires having "righted the ship" and find the guy who is going to take you to the promised land.  
It's set he could leave after this season but my guess is he will stay another three or four regardless of results. That's still seven years. If it was really about a foundation he would stay four max and no more.

Sent from my SM-A146U using Tapatalk

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
In general when looking for a coach, tournament runs should not be a main consideration. Total wins, conference finishes, tournament seeds and consistency getting there is much more important in my opinion.

 

Yep look at archie the elite 8 run gave him all his milage and he is an awful coach.

 

Sent from my SM-A146U using Tapatalk

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Chris007 said:

I was just being sarcastic that people around here say Woodson is too old but let's hire Pearl who is two years younger. The goalpost always changes. We need a coach who can get us to the tournament every year. Now we need a coach who wins neutral games in the nonconference season and goes to a sweet 16. It's all exhausting and I might be even dumber for posting in this thread. 

Even opening this thread is like the twilight zone. So many great AD'S and coaches in here.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I guess this isn't a rant but a question and maybe it's been answered on here already.
Woodson was brought in to get the program back to where it needs to be in their words. How long do you stick with him? Does he have a shorter leash so he don't have enough time to undo any positives that he has done? When does his age negatively impact recruiting? I believe coaching wise Woodson is underachieving imo. All that means is if you gave a hall of fame coach our roster last 3 years I feel he gets more out of them. Mostly development and in game coaching just my opinion. Thoughts?

Sent from my SM-A326U using Tapatalk

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, coonhounds said:

I guess this isn't a rant but a question and maybe it's been answered on here already.
Woodson was brought in to get the program back to where it needs to be in their words. How long do you stick with him? Does he have a shorter leash so he don't have enough time to undo any positives that he has done? When does his age negatively impact recruiting? I believe coaching wise Woodson is underachieving imo. All that means is if you gave a hall of fame coach our roster last 3 years I feel he gets more out of them. Mostly development and in game coaching just my opinion. Thoughts?

Sent from my SM-A326U using Tapatalk
 

His contract goes till 27. I wouldn't extend him, and tell him he has bridged the program from the old to the new. But we'll see what happens

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Hornsby said:

Yep look at archie the elite 8 run gave him all his milage and he is an awful coach.

 

Sent from my SM-A146U using Tapatalk

 

 

 

Why are you insulting awful coaches?  :)  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I guess this isn't a rant but a question and maybe it's been answered on here already.

Woodson was brought in to get the program back to where it needs to be in their words. How long do you stick with him? Does he have a shorter leash so he don't have enough time to undo any positives that he has done? When does his age negatively impact recruiting? I believe coaching wise Woodson is underachieving imo. All that means is if you gave a hall of fame coach our roster last 3 years I feel he gets more out of them. Mostly development and in game coaching just my opinion. Thoughts?

 

Sent from my SM-A326U using Tapatalk

 

 

I think 4 years is plenty what if it starts going south after that? You need to get the coach while we are still making the tourney. Last thing we need is another rebuild again. 2027 is too long imo is he is really just a bridge coach

 

 

Sent from my SM-A146U using Tapatalk

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, Hornsby said:

I think 4 years is plenty what if it starts going south after that? You need to get the coach while we are still making the tourney. Last thing we need is another rebuild again. 2027 is too long imo is he is really just a bridge coach

 

 

Sent from my SM-A146U using Tapatalk

 

 

 

So you think fire him next year even if we make the tournament both years?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I think 4 years is plenty what if it starts going south after that? You need to get the coach while we are still making the tourney. Last thing we need is another rebuild again. 2027 is too long imo is he is really just a bridge coach 
 
Sent from my SM-A146U using Tapatalk
 
 
 
Thanks that's what I am thinking. Problem is this season is very much in question of going south. We need several things to go right and not much room for bad from here on out. We also as most programs have huge question marks on next year's team. We likely lose ware and mm. We could miss the tournament this season and then be way worse next year. I also see a path to being way better next season but again will need alot of things to go our way

Sent from my SM-A326U using Tapatalk

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

All the hand-wringing and worrying about next year when it's only December is exactly why I wanted to see us sign a stronger class in the fall. But I was told it wasn't necessary because spring signings and the portal would take care of it. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think you push him out the door if after the next 2 seasons (not counting this one), he doesn't make it to an Elite 8 and contend for a B1G title. I would think (and hope) that a 67-68y Mike Woodson having finished a completely mediocre 5-6y tenure at his beloved alma mater wouldn't play hardball or make demands but would graciously exit stage left with a small buyout and the gratitude of the university and (some) fans for stabilizing the program. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Hornsby said:

I think 4 years is plenty what if it starts going south after that? You need to get the coach while we are still making the tourney. Last thing we need is another rebuild again.

Sent from my SM-A146U using Tapatalk
 

I would want to see a decent foundation set within the first four years.  I think we have that in terms of "sending kids to the next level," especially if Ware goes this year or next.  The big hole that I see is the pipeline of HS recruits.  IMO, need to be bringing in 3-4 kids per year, and filling holes with the portal (rather than the other way around).  Year 1: 2 (Duncumb/Bates).   Year 2: 4 (JHS/Renue/Banks/Gunn)  Year 3:  2 (Cupps/Newton)  Year 4:  1 or TBD.  Kind of need a splash this spring if possible and then get a better pipeline going forward.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Adillac said:

I think you push him out the door if after the next 2 seasons (not counting this one), he doesn't make it to an Elite 8 and contend for a B1G title. I would think (and hope) that a 67-68y Mike Woodson having finished a completely mediocre 5-6y tenure at his beloved alma mater wouldn't play hardball or make demands but would graciously exit stage left with a small buyout and the gratitude of the university and (some) fans for stabilizing the program. 

I don't even think you have to have that.  I assume Woody is a reasonable guy and he knows he no spring chicken.  Really it's a matter of keeping the lines of communication open each year (and during the season) on what is going well, what needs work, and the best way to transition to the next guy.  I am sure he doesn't want see IU go south because he wants to hang on to the gig.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
So you think fire him next year even if we make the tournament both years?
Never said fire him he steps away which to me is what a filler coach would do after three or four years. If he is a bridge to me that means short term not 7 or 8 years. Unless he is not intended be a termorary filler coach?

Sent from my SM-A146U using Tapatalk

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

×