IUWBB at Maine - Thursday, 11.30.23 @ 7:00 ET on ESPN+

[Class of '66 Old Fart 84,648]

2:55 left and we lead 62-54.

[Class of '66 Old Fart 84,648]

We finally pulled our heads out of our a$$ in the 4th Q and return to Bloomington with a 67-59 win.  We get the 'W' but Maine deserved it more.  Next Sunday at 2:00 we host Stetson.

Pts:  Mack 22; Sydney 17; Sara 10; Yarden and Chloe each 7

Reb: Sydney 10; Mack 7; Sara 5

Asst:  Chloe 6; Yarden, Sydney & Sara each with 4

We ended up 43% FG vs 40% for Maine

[Stuhoo 80,548]

Don’t have ESPN+, but a second half 38-22 is good.

We also clearly controlled their superstar in the second half. She still scored some, but missed a ton of second half shots.

[WayneFleekHoosier 48,312]

Glad they won this. Emotional rollercoaster and a sold out crowd, Take the W and move on to the next one.


Sent from my iPad using BtownBanners

[GoHoosiers1996 41]

I wish we would have utilized our bench more tonight, especially when our starters were not showing the effort and results we are accustomed to. 

[TTT 938]

Did IU Ladies design a game plan to play a certain way and were going to win that particular way regardless as long as they won and then use it for prep and teaching for big ten.  The same could happen vs Stetson.

B.K. especially in his prime unless he was trying to make a statement win a few games IU would play a certain way even if they looked awful doing it.

It seems like IU Ladies were not really trying to win as in blowout in this one but more of a celebration tour game.

If not, hard to tell where this season goes.

[Stuhoo 80,548]

4 minutes ago, TTT said:

Did IU Ladies design a game plan to play a certain way and were going to win that particular way regardless as long as they won and then use it for prep and teaching for big ten.  The same could happen vs Stetson.

Doubtful that it was a deliberate plan. If it was they would have scrapped it as soon as things went south in the first half.

[GoHoosiers1996 41]

7 hours ago, TTT said:

Did IU Ladies design a game plan to play a certain way and were going to win that particular way regardless as long as they won and then use it for prep and teaching for big ten.  The same could happen vs Stetson.

B.K. especially in his prime unless he was trying to make a statement win a few games IU would play a certain way even if they looked awful doing it.

It seems like IU Ladies were not really trying to win as in blowout in this one but more of a celebration tour game.

If not, hard to tell where this season goes.

Who knows, but I doubt it. In my opinion, the first half plan/results seemed very similar to the Stanford game. It was difficult to get the ball to Mackenzie and we were not hitting threes.

i do like the RMK reference!

Edited December 1, 2023 by GoHoosiers1996

[Class of '66 Old Fart 84,648]

In the aftermath of last night's struggles, here's a nice story on the bond between Mack and her brother Cam.

https://www.insidethehall.com/2023/12/01/a-well-kept-secret-and-a-sassy-text-mackenzie-holmes-brother-was-going-to-surprise-her-in-maine-no-matter-what/?fbclid=IwAR1V2b8xWQc4qQdroBcx2EGHWckkBFCkrWnehuBLbX7gxp5zIM7BugEyNKY

[TTT 938]

After watching post game press conference I noticed some coughing and wondering if some of the IU Ladies were a little bit under the weather.

[RPO 39]

Another good feature on Mackenzie’s return to Maine: https://www.thenexthoops.com/ncaaw/big-ten/mackenzie-holmes-maine/

[GloryDays 5,920]

Love Bargesser's quickness, defense and she has the ability to play lead guard but her shooting stroke is a disaster. Her free throw shooting is painful to watch with the twist of her torso.

Hopefully someone can work with her because everything else is great and we need her to play.