Jump to content

Thanks for visiting BtownBanners.com!  We noticed you have AdBlock enabled.  While ads can be annoying, we utilize them to provide these forums free of charge to you!  Please consider removing your AdBlock for BtownBanners or consider signing up to donate and help BtownBanners stay alive!  Thank you!

IUc2016

NCAA MBB Transfer Portal

Recommended Posts

19 minutes ago, Chris007 said:

https://247sports.com/college/indiana/Article/Kansas-State-guard-Nijel-Pack-discusses-his-transfer-options-approach-potential-NBA-workouts-185522728/

As I said in my earlier post I think IU will try, I just don't think Pack will have interest in us. 

He played more pg his first year.   Played mostly off the ball this year.   New era.  Lol.   Sophomore with an agent. Like you said IU can make a pitch and try and tell him why playing the 2 would be better but if the player has his mind made up on what he wants to do then it doesn’t matter if any of us or the coaches thinks it can work out.    Trevor posted a great scouting report of Pack.  Really good stuff 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
25 minutes ago, Chris007 said:

https://247sports.com/college/indiana/Article/Kansas-State-guard-Nijel-Pack-discusses-his-transfer-options-approach-potential-NBA-workouts-185522728/

As I said in my earlier post I think IU will try, I just don't think Pack will have interest in us. 

Paywall? Agreed, doesn't appear to be a good fit from either side with what he needs and who we'll have.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 3/28/2022 at 9:20 PM, Loaded Chicken Sandwich said:

The dude averaged about as many turnovers as he did assists. He was the poor mans, poor man's LaMelo Ball. 

Curbelo is like many other players in the Big Ten, if you watch them against IU, you would think they were All Americans but as soon as they play a team not in Red that also doesn't say "Indiana" on the jersey, they blow.  Curbelo had a horrible tournament

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Chris007 said:

Rob didn't even make the top 30

As I said in another thread. He’s about league average for the role of backup PG. He doesn’t hurt us wherever he goes and there’s no reason to have ill will towards the guy. 

2 hours ago, btownqb said:

They've obviously not seen Lander play.  

Coaches will be interested in his upside. He was basically a frosh last year and he obviously didn’t fit into what Woody wanted. 
 

But he has a lot of room to improve and the tools to do so. Some coach will be excited with him as a project. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Lander is quick and has excellent court vision. His shot needs work and he was weak defensively. But his weaknesses can be corrected. Lander shot better from the field, from 3-point range and from the foul line than Phinisee did. He has natural ability as a point guard, just needs to work on some things.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
29 minutes ago, Honkyman said:

Lander is quick and has excellent court vision. His shot needs work and he was weak defensively. But his weaknesses can be corrected. Lander shot better from the field, from 3-point range and from the foul line than Phinisee did. He has natural ability as a point guard, just needs to work on some things.

Saying he shot better than Rob is a low bar. Lander could do well at a mid major. Or a lower team in a P5 conference. He just has a lot of weaknesses both offensively and defensively. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, Papacap said:

Saying he shot better than Rob is a low bar.

Rob Phinisee started three years at IU with some really good performances and a couple of game winning shots. So the bar can't be too low for him. Will Kristian Lander fulfill the  promise of his 5-Star ranking. Not likely. But he could be a pretty good player on a decent team if given the chance to play and develop.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 hours ago, str8baller said:

As I said in another thread. He’s about league average for the role of backup PG. He doesn’t hurt us wherever he goes and there’s no reason to have ill will towards the guy. 

Coaches will be interested in his upside. He was basically a frosh last year and he obviously didn’t fit into what Woody wanted. 
 

But he has a lot of room to improve and the tools to do so. Some coach will be excited with him as a project. 

I fail to see any upside in KL's game. I don't think there were any "fit" issues in regards to KL and CMW, outside of lack of talent. 

His tools are- small, pretty weak, and a poor shooter. He throws a nice lob though. Fairly quick. 

I just don't see it. Absolutely unaware consistently, unless the ball is in his hands. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
18 minutes ago, Papacap said:

Saying he shot better than Rob is a low bar. Lander could do well at a mid major. Or a lower team in a P5 conference. He just has a lot of weaknesses both offensively and defensively. 

I don't think he is PW5 at all. Evansville/IN ST, maybe he could be successful there. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×