Jump to content

Thanks for visiting BtownBanners.com!  We noticed you have AdBlock enabled.  While ads can be annoying, we utilize them to provide these forums free of charge to you!  Please consider removing your AdBlock for BtownBanners or consider signing up to donate and help BtownBanners stay alive!  Thank you!

Class of '66 Old Fart

2024 General Recruiting Thread (BBall)

Recommended Posts

Just now, Class of '66 Old Fart said:

I can't recall.  If indeed the visit is to watch Daquan Davis, would this be Woody's first time of personally watching or did he watch an OTE game earlier and it wasn't one of Davis' better games?

He may have seen him twice. He saw 1 game which I think you’re right was not 1 of his good ones and I’ve got it in my head that he was with Ya at the OTE open workout event a couple of months ago, but I might be wrong about that.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
42 minutes ago, Chris007 said:

Then hammer the portal for some guards

In an ideal world where MM comes back I would put him at the 4.

1- ? 

2-?

3- McNeely

4- MM 

5- Reneau 

If we get Queen I would have him backup Reneau and would play them together a little but not the whole game. We need to find a PG or hope Cupps back a huge jump before next year. We have to go out a get another knock down shoot to play at the 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 minutes ago, Scotty R said:

In an ideal world where MM comes back I would put him at the 4.

1- ? 

2-?

3- McNeely

4- MM 

5- Reneau 

If we get Queen I would have him backup Reneau and would play them together a little but not the whole game. We need to find a PG or hope Cupps back a huge jump before next year. We have to go out a get another knock down shoot to play at the 2

100% correct. MM is a 4. I've been saying this all season. Malik is a 5, who can step out every once in a while. Both have to get better at rebounding this offseason. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Chris007 said:

100% correct. MM is a 4. I've been saying this all season. Malik is a 5, who can step out every once in a while. Both have to get better at rebounding this offseason. 

I agree at this level they are. My concern would be if we manage to land Queen then Woodson would just play Queen at the 5 and Reneau at the 4.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
100% correct. MM is a 4. I've been saying this all season. Malik is a 5, who can step out every once in a while. Both have to get better at rebounding this offseason. 

Maybe MM is a 4.

But Reneau really isn’t 5. He doesn’t rim protect or rebound well enough to be a college 5.


Sent from my iPad using BtownBanners mobile app

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, WayneFleekHoosier said:


Maybe MM is a 4.

But Reneau really isn’t 5. He doesn’t rim protect or rebound well enough to be a college 5.


Sent from my iPad using BtownBanners mobile app

Maybe MM will be here next year or maybe he won't too. Malik definitely doesn't protect the rim, and his rebounding needs to improve.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
28 minutes ago, Stuhoo said:

Malik is a four on defense and a five on offense. 

Probably true, but the rotations in this scenario are really simple:

1) Reneau-Mgbako-McNeeley

2) Queen-Reneau-Mgbako

3) Queen-Mgbako-McNeeley

4) Queen-Reneau-McNeeley

No knock on Ware at all, but this works a lot better than what you’re dealing with now. Way better complimentary pieces. Yeah, you’ve lost rim protection, but you’ve gained skill, floor spacing and versatility. Would love this, the guard situation is the concern. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 hours ago, WayneFleekHoosier said:


Maybe MM is a 4.

But Reneau really isn’t 5. He doesn’t rim protect or rebound well enough to be a college 5.


Sent from my iPad using BtownBanners mobile app

 

10 hours ago, Demo said:

Probably true, but the rotations in this scenario are really simple:

1) Reneau-Mgbako-McNeeley

2) Queen-Reneau-Mgbako

3) Queen-Mgbako-McNeeley

4) Queen-Reneau-McNeeley

No knock on Ware at all, but this works a lot better than what you’re dealing with now. Way better complimentary pieces. Yeah, you’ve lost rim protection, but you’ve gained skill, floor spacing and versatility. Would love this, the guard situation is the concern. 

I would say Mgbako’s not a full-time 3 at this level. I’ve been impressed sporadically with his rebounding, and guarding college 4s probably masks his defensive deficiencies at this point.

I was encouraged when Queen’s defense on a perimeter switch impressed you a week or two ago, Demo. I love a real rim protector, but plenty of good defenses just force tough shots without one — Tennessee the best current example IMHO

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 hours ago, Class of '66 Old Fart said:

If he leaves then that suggests to me we have no interest in Davis.

I don't know for sure but I was told he left after the first game. That he was only there to see Tiller. Do you know if he stayed?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Chris007 said:

I don't know for sure but I was told he left after the first game. That he was only there to see Tiller. Do you know if he stayed?

So is it fair to assume they’re looking at Tiller as a ‘24? Didn’t he say this trip was to look at ‘24’s?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Chris007 said:

Yes, he said that. Tiller is for sure a 24 yet, supposedly his family wants him to be a 25.

Tiller’s a super talented kid. Like him a lot. But he and Queen would not make a ton of sense in the same class, or really any sense. They’re different kinds of players but very much occupy similar roles. That absolutely feels like an either/or proposition.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Demo said:

Tiller’s a super talented kid. Like him a lot. But he and Queen would not make a ton of sense in the same class, or really any sense. They’re different kinds of players but very much occupy similar roles. That absolutely feels like an either/or proposition.

That's why we would probably take both, it doesn't make sense

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
38 minutes ago, Demo said:

So is it fair to assume they’re looking at Tiller as a ‘24? Didn’t he say this trip was to look at ‘24’s?

He said he would be out recruiting on Tuesday and then specifically added it was '24 recruiting.

And I've read elsewhere that talk of a re-class for Tiller has cooled.

 

No idea if Lasley knows for certain or when he actually wrote his story but he names Davis.

https://hoosierillustrated.com/mike-woodson-out-watching-key-indiana-basketball-recruiting-targets-on-tuesday-night/?fbclid=IwAR1lfr7HTpk13WEYu8JgIinfiFQ-EWhrpZDPcUwC2RJvwjOQUdvBd5Cp7eM#google_vignette

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×