Jump to content

Thanks for visiting BtownBanners.com!  We noticed you have AdBlock enabled.  While ads can be annoying, we utilize them to provide these forums free of charge to you!  Please consider removing your AdBlock for BtownBanners or consider signing up to donate and help BtownBanners stay alive!  Thank you!

Uspshoosier

Bracketology and Team Resumes

Recommended Posts

5 hours ago, brumdog45 said:

Bubble action today (some pretty far down the bubble):

IU loses 69-67 at Purdue

Florida loses at home to Kentucky 71-63

Creighton loses at home to Seton Hall 65-60

VIrginia Tech lost at Clemson 63-59

Oklahoma won at Kansas State 78-71

Dayton won at home against Davidson 82-76

Loyola beat Northern Iowa in the MVC tournament 66-43

Wyoming won at home in overtime against Fresno State, 68-64

VCU lost at St. Louis 69-65

North Texas lost at UTEP 70-68.......might have been a big one should they not win their conference tournament.  That's a quad 3 loss.

Notre Dame over Pittsburgh easily (good for IU to keep Notre Dame Q1)

 

 

 

 

 

You think if Loyola wins it’s conference tournament it opens up an at large bid?  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, Uspshoosier said:

 

I know lunardi isn’t the most accurate and that there will be plenty of movement this next week, but imagine if it did shake out like this? 3 big ten teams in Dayton. I actually think that would be a nightmare scenario b/c I just don’t think the committee would let it happen. So we’d get bumped so 2 teams from the same conference didn’t play each other.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
24 minutes ago, NashvilleHoosier said:

I know lunardi isn’t the most accurate and that there will be plenty of movement this next week, but imagine if it did shake out like this? 3 big ten teams in Dayton. I actually think that would be a nightmare scenario b/c I just don’t think the committee would let it happen. So we’d get bumped so 2 teams from the same conference didn’t play each other.

I agree, and I think even though we are projected last team in right now, a win Thursday is essential. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
21 minutes ago, BtownStrength said:

I agree, and I think even though we are projected last team in right now, a win Thursday is essential. 

For sure. No question we have to win, especially since it will be against another cut line team and be a quad 1 win. Our resume is so fragile. ND jumped back up to a quad 1 win by 2 spots. St. John’s is hanging on as a quad 2 win by 3 spots but Rutgers has fallen, officially giving us a quad 3 loss by 1 spot. A win Thursday is the bare minimum b/c our team sheet could take some hits along the way.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

IU gained 2 spots in the NET from 45 to 43. Even the NET darlings Iowa St gained a spot from losing.

Both cases are more likely caused by North Texas getting upset than anything else.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

IU has put themselves in position now regardless of where bracketologist have them last 4 in or first 4 out where Thursdays game is an elimination game for them.   Bubble teams keep losing and winning that could be enough but I would be sweating it.   If they win 2 they will be in.  This team isn’t trending in the wrong  direction.    Makes the Rutgers game that more frustrating.  If they won that at worst they are probably first 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Uspshoosier said:

  Makes the Rutgers game that more frustrating.  If they won that at worst they are probably first 4

Rutgers, Wisconsin, at Wisconsin, at Ohio St., at Iowa, maybe at NW. Any of those and it’s a different story. 2 of those and we’re feeling great. 3 of those? Hah. We’d still be considered not very good at closing games but we’d be arguing about whether we’d rather be in a 8/9 game or 7/10 game.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, NashvilleHoosier said:

Rutgers, Wisconsin, at Wisconsin, at Ohio St., at Iowa, maybe at NW. Any of those and it’s a different story. 2 of those and we’re feeling great. 3 of those? Hah. We’d still be considered not very good at closing games but we’d be arguing about whether we’d rather be in a 8/9 game or 7/10 game.

I hear you on all of those but the Rutgers game was basically a snap shot of IU basketball for the last 4 years.   Not being able to beat Rutgers at home in the biggest game of the year is a gut punch.   
 Road games are what they are but each year continuing to lose Q2 games at home is killer on the resume.   
 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Uspshoosier said:

I hear you on all of those but the Rutgers game was basically a snap shot of IU basketball for the last 4 years.   Not being able to beat Rutgers at home in the biggest game of the year is a gut punch.   
 Road games are what they are but each year continuing to lose Q2 games at home is killer on the resume.   
 

 

To add to this.  IU had single plays in conference with 2 other B1G bubble teams and had both of them at home.   They lost both.  IU lost every single play B1G game this year.    

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I feel like Michigan losing today has become pretty pivotal. If they were to win at OSU today, they'd go into our game (provided MSU beats Maryland) 17-13, 11-9 with 5 quad 1 wins and a combined 8-12 quad 1/2 record. Even if we were to beat them on Thursday, if the committee were comparing resumes, Michigan would probably still have the higher NET, more quality wins, finished higher in conference. We'd only have more wins, and the fact that Michigan would fall below the dreaded 4 games above .500. Would the committee look at head to head and value their road victory (trouncing) over our neutral court win? 

Don't mind me, I'm just over here agonizing over every doomsday scenario and how we could have avoided it this morning. Nice little Sunday.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×