WayneFleekHoosier Posted May 26, 2016 Posted May 26, 2016 I think we are going to want JB on the court as much as possible next season. He looks much stronger. He has been working on his shooting and dribbling nonstop. If he gets healthy he will be an absolute weapon. Sent from my iPad using BtownBanners Class of '66 Old Fart, lillurk and ALASKA HOOSIER 3 Quote
Walking Boot of Doom Posted May 26, 2016 Posted May 26, 2016 Uh... Tim Priller is still on the team... and has played a whopping 40 minutes. That's a total of one game in 2 years. Obviously McSwain isn't Priller but Crean is ok with not playing those on scholarship. He didn't play April either. Hoetzel played about 8 minutes a Gane. Hartman only played like 4. Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G900A using BtownBanners mobile app And what's the difference between all of the players you listed and Freddie? Freddie is a transfer with playing experience. So far, Crean's transfer have been expected to contribute day one. Alford Bailey and lillurk 2 Quote
Class of '66 Old Fart Posted May 26, 2016 Posted May 26, 2016 And if he steps up his defensive effort and exhibits the leadership that he's said he wants to be. Quote
X-Hoosier Posted May 26, 2016 Posted May 26, 2016 And what's the difference between all of the players you listed and Freddie? Freddie is a transfer with playing experience. So far, Crean's transfer have been expected to contribute day one. How many were from a JUCO that he played? Devan Dumes? Lol. Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G900A using BtownBanners mobile app Quote
HoosierHoops1 Posted May 26, 2016 Posted May 26, 2016 1 hour ago, X-Hoosier said: How many were from a JUCO that he played? Devan Dumes? Lol. Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G900A using BtownBanners mobile app All kidding aside, Dumes did get a lot of minutes from day 1... which bolsters his point Walking Boot of Doom 1 Quote
X-Hoosier Posted May 26, 2016 Posted May 26, 2016 All kidding aside, Dumes did get a lot of minutes from day 1... which bolsters his point On a team that won 6 games? Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G900A using BtownBanners mobile app Quote
HoosierHoops1 Posted May 26, 2016 Posted May 26, 2016 Yes. We all know how that season went, as did both years with DD, but what we need from McSwain is totally different. I don't think anyone is saying FM is going to come in and be a top 3 stats guy, but rather a guy who brings some real positives when he enters the game, during the 1st 35 min of play. Class of '66 Old Fart, Walking Boot of Doom and Bittersince87 3 Quote
Bittersince87 Posted May 26, 2016 Posted May 26, 2016 I just think McSwain is a positive for the team. He won't ask to run the point I believe. As long he uses his freakish athleticism to play defense and scoop up rebounds I think he will be a great addition. He doesn't have to do everything. Sent from my iPad using BtownBanners ALASKA HOOSIER 1 Quote
gfunk69 Posted May 26, 2016 Posted May 26, 2016 I don't think Hartman should start. OG is a better 3 and Davis is a better 4 than him X-Hoosier 1 Quote
Hardwood83 Posted May 26, 2016 Posted May 26, 2016 32 minutes ago, gfunk69 said: I don't think Hartman should start. OG is a better 3 and Davis is a better 4 than him That's a bold statement. Would be great if that turns out to be true and CH would be a valuable guy to bring off the bench, but not sure we can assume that based on HS/AAU highlight tapes. Quote
gfunk69 Posted May 26, 2016 Posted May 26, 2016 That's a bold statement. Would be great if that turns out to be true and CH would be a valuable guy to bring off the bench, but not sure we can assume that based on HS/AAU highlight tapes. He can't gaurd anything. There are certain teams where he could be a great asset as a stretch 4 but if any team has size (Wisconsin, Mich St., Purdue) he will be exploited and in more cases his poor defense outweighs his inconsistent offense Quote
Hardwood83 Posted May 26, 2016 Posted May 26, 2016 1 minute ago, gfunk69 said: He can't gaurd anything. There are certain teams where he could be a great asset as a stretch 4 but if any team has size (Wisconsin, Mich St., Purdue) he will be exploited and in more cases his poor defense outweighs his inconsistent offense Yeah, you've got a point about his D. I'm not convinced we can simply assume DD will be better though. WayneFleekHoosier 1 Quote
BtownBanner6 Posted May 26, 2016 Posted May 26, 2016 Would not be surprised if Newkirk started. He's a true point and it allows a veteran presence off the bench in RoJo. Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners I agree that I think Newkirk might start but Rojo will never come off the bench. BGleas 1 Quote
OliviaPope40 Posted May 26, 2016 Posted May 26, 2016 Priller will be the fan favorite again and be leader of the bench mob. ALASKA HOOSIER 1 Quote
Stuhoo Posted May 26, 2016 Posted May 26, 2016 That's a bold statement. Would be great if that turns out to be true and CH would be a valuable guy to bring off the bench, but not sure we can assume that based on HS/AAU highlight tapes. Hartman may not start, but if he doesn't it will be because Newkirk is starting in a three guard lineup. Class of '66 Old Fart and WayneFleekHoosier 2 Quote
lillurk Posted May 26, 2016 Posted May 26, 2016 7 hours ago, WayneFleekHoosier said: Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners pretty exciting roster next season. Where are we weak? PG? Maybe. Wing with a point getter? Maybe. Seems like a solid roster makeup for once. Need OG to continue making strides. I love when he shoots the gap for steals like Oladipo was good at. We are not the most athletic team though. Speed, jumping, etc. Rojo average. JB the same. TB the same. Hartman sub average, Juwan sub average. OG and Freddie hyper athletes. OG isn't fast though. Very cool roster. Looking forward to seeing CuJo, DeRon, Devonte, and Newkirk. I hate that nearly all the borderline B1G NBA players returned. Going to be a tough road. Juwan's athleticism may not stand out, but he appears to have good speed, quickness, and quick leaping (including second jump) ability. As a frosh it was most obvious to me on D and the boards. HoosierAloha, MadAboutIndiana, Class of '66 Old Fart and 1 other 4 Quote
WayneFleekHoosier Posted May 26, 2016 Posted May 26, 2016 Juwan's athleticism may not stand out, but he appears to have good speed, quickness, and quick leaping (including second jump) ability. As a frosh it was most obvious to me on D and the boards. His defensive posture and positioning were remarkable for a freshman. His rebounding fundamentals as well. Sent from my iPad using BtownBanners lillurk, Class of '66 Old Fart and HoosierAloha 3 Quote
Hoosiers219 Posted May 26, 2016 Posted May 26, 2016 Hartman may not start, but if he doesn't it will be because Newkirk is starting in a three guard lineup. Agree. To be honest, I was shocked we didn't take a run at a true PG via grad transfer. Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners Quote
BubbleKnuts Posted May 26, 2016 Posted May 26, 2016 Lets not forget we can still stretch the floor without Max, Yogi and Nick. We will be MUCH longer next year, and while I certainly expect our speed and our scoring numbers to go down, we still have Collin to take wing and shoot/drive, I noticed improvement in his ability to get into and down the lane for a bucket this past season. Not to mention Thomas, who will take leaps and bounds in the offseason. Crean will probably strive to work with him with a focus to stretch the space as a true 5. The rest depends on how the Frosh class and, very anticipated Sophomore class, decides how to lead. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.