Jump to content

Thanks for visiting BtownBanners.com!  We noticed you have AdBlock enabled.  While ads can be annoying, we utilize them to provide these forums free of charge to you!  Please consider removing your AdBlock for BtownBanners or consider signing up to donate and help BtownBanners stay alive!  Thank you!

BlueDevil

College Bball Thread

Recommended Posts

They look like a team that could have better chemistry and have enough talent to be a problem in conference. I flat out hate Purdue but respect Painter and think he is a class act. As good as Ivey was, I think he was a net negative for the team.

They are an interesting team. Loyer and Smith both very confident players. Lacking in size but not a lot else. Great ball movement per usual. They shouldn’t be a threat but this is a Painter team I’m curious to see how it works out. Smith, Morton, Loyer starting when you have Kaufman and Furst is interesting.


Sent from my iPad using BtownBanners mobile app

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 hours ago, Loaded Chicken Sandwich said:

Purdue looking good. Braden Smith running the offense very well. Active on defense. Newnan hitting shots. Edey just bring huge. 

Against one of the worst teams in D1 (Kenpom 330) Braden Smith was 1-6 fg, 4 assists, 3 turnovers, 7 steals.

He plays with confidence, but he’s also an undersized freshman who can’t get to the rim.

I’ll take my chances with X, JHS, or for that matter, Gabe Cupps over Braden Smith.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
31 minutes ago, IUc2016 said:

Purdue shot 37% from the field against Milwaukee (sub 300 in Kenpom).

And honestly, Edey was really bad. 4-13 with a lot of easy looks. 

Edey can be unstoppable when he catches near the basket and he looks like he’s in better shape this year, but he still moves kinda stiffly.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, J34 said:

I think we'll be just fine at the pg position. 

Oh I don’t think we are in bad shape , hope you didn’t take it that way , but he’s a kid you’d love to have on your roster and he’s likely a four year ( or however many years kids will get for whatever reason) starter ….it’s early but I’m not positive we will get to keep ours for four 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
51 minutes ago, Stuhoo said:

Against one of the worst teams in D1 (Kenpom 330) Braden Smith was 1-6 fg, 4 assists, 3 turnovers, 7 steals.

He plays with confidence, but he’s also an undersized freshman who can’t get to the rim.

I’ll take my chances with X, JHS, or for that matter, Gabe Cupps over Braden Smith.

Stu not sure if you watched or just saw the stat line …I’d you didn’t and you can stomach it try and catch their next game …watch smith run offense.  He’s very small which is tough to make up for in big ten play without being a freak athlete.  It was clear in high school I just wasn’t sure if it would translate to the big stage but he has that “it” factor , he sees things on the floor and can control the pace and flow of a game and he looks comfortable doing it at 19.  I’m sure he’ll take some lumps with bad shooting nights but if  not this year the next three he’s gonna be way worse than a Jordan bohannon to us 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
59 minutes ago, Stuhoo said:

Edey can be unstoppable when he catches near the basket and he looks like he’s in better shape this year, but he still moves kinda stiffly.

 

It's kind of a lost art nowadays, but teaching big men to pin a guy on the block on the weak side(and no one is just moving Edey outta the way) and for the team to notice, and actually swing the ball around for a post delivery... Purdue could get 30 ppg off just that because of how big he is. But for whatever reason, they liked throwing it to him in a lot of awkward situations. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, IU/Butler/Notre Dame said:

Stu not sure if you watched or just saw the stat line …I’d you didn’t and you can stomach it try and catch their next game …watch smith run offense.  He’s very small which is tough to make up for in big ten play without being a freak athlete.  It was clear in high school I just wasn’t sure if it would translate to the big stage but he has that “it” factor , he sees things on the floor and can control the pace and flow of a game and he looks comfortable doing it at 19.  I’m sure he’ll take some lumps with bad shooting nights but if  not this year the next three he’s gonna be way worse than a Jordan bohannon to us 

I watched.

Other than the visual and the competitiveness, I don’t see the comp.

Bohannon was an undersized two guard ala Hulls and Smith is an undersized point. That’s a very different proposition. 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
59 minutes ago, IU/Butler/Notre Dame said:

Stu not sure if you watched or just saw the stat line …I’d you didn’t and you can stomach it try and catch their next game …watch smith run offense.  He’s very small which is tough to make up for in big ten play without being a freak athlete.  It was clear in high school I just wasn’t sure if it would translate to the big stage but he has that “it” factor , he sees things on the floor and can control the pace and flow of a game and he looks comfortable doing it at 19.  I’m sure he’ll take some lumps with bad shooting nights but if  not this year the next three he’s gonna be way worse than a Jordan bohannon to us 

I agree that he didn't look bad last night but let's see him play against a little better competition. I think he's going to get abused on defense in the Big Ten.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, Stuhoo said:

Other than the visual and the competitiveness, I don’t see the comp.

Bohannon was an undersized two guard ala Hulls and Smith is an undersized point.

 

Hulls was an outstanding ball handler and would have been our primary pg if not for yogi I think that’s actually a better comp I was just trying to fit opponents mold ….those steals on the stat sheet aren’t athleticism they are from him knowing where the ball is and will go …I think as an upperclassmen he will be an aaron craft Jordan bohannon blend and he will be no fun to play against 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, HoosierX said:

I agree that he didn't look bad last night but let's see him play against a little better competition. I think he's going to get abused on defense in the Big Ten.

I won’t bet my house on it yet …you’re right …part of why I watched last night was he captivated me in hs play and I wanted to see how that translates to a floor full of athletes …he will take some lumps but I think he will surprise a lot of people …painter starting him was something I certainly didn’t immediately expect 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, IU/Butler/Notre Dame said:

Hulls was an outstanding ball handler and would have been our primary pg if not for yogi I think that’s actually a better comp I was just trying to fit opponents mold ….those steals on the stat sheet aren’t athleticism they are from him knowing where the ball is and will go …I think as an upperclassmen he will be an aaron craft Jordan bohannon blend and he will be no fun to play against 

Hulls was an outstanding ball handler who was 5’11 and not super quick. Therefore he couldn’t play the point nearly as successfully as he could play the SG role.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×