Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
6 hours ago, HoosierAloha said:

Kopp is averaging ~5 ppg in conference play and P Stew ~7 ppg. I'm not sure if that qualifies as a scorer. They're both "shooters" who aren't really having anything consistently run to get them open. I believe P Stew has it in him to get open but Kopp seems a half dozen steps too slow on both ends.

 Wasn't saying they were 'scorers' as opposed to 'shooters', but right now the two of them are not working well on the court at the same time.  Basically that leaves X as the only guy driving in an X/Stewart/Kopp/Thompson/TJD lineup.  I'd rather have X and Galloway with the ability to drive and kick to either TJD or Thompson or outside to Stewart or Kopp, whichever is in.

 

Posted
6 hours ago, HoosierAloha said:

Kopp is averaging ~5 ppg in conference play and P Stew ~7 ppg. I'm not sure if that qualifies as a scorer. They're both "shooters" who aren't really having anything consistently run to get them open. I believe P Stew has it in him to get open but Kopp seems a half dozen steps too slow on both ends.

I disagree somewhat.  Parker doesn’t move much at all on offense.  When he does move it’s not anything close to full speed.  Kopp is much better than Parker on the defensive end.  He is very active with his hands.

Posted
21 minutes ago, brumdog45 said:

 Wasn't saying they were 'scorers' as opposed to 'shooters', but right now the two of them are not working well on the court at the same time.  Basically that leaves X as the only guy driving in an X/Stewart/Kopp/Thompson/TJD lineup.  I'd rather have X and Galloway with the ability to drive and kick to either TJD or Thompson or outside to Stewart or Kopp, whichever is in.

 

I'm not sure there is much of a win in this situation. The best case scenario is they would disrupt on defense and get out an run. If we only have 1 shooter on the floor then the defense will totally collapse and Race - Trayce will struggle in the paint. We need some players to develop in the off-season (not talk about developing but actually developing) to have better rounded threats.

Posted
46 minutes ago, IU - Kaulie said:

I disagree somewhat.  Parker doesn’t move much at all on offense.  When he does move it’s not anything close to full speed.  Kopp is much better than Parker on the defensive end.  He is very active with his hands.

Neither would ever be confused with an above average defender. P Stew gets hung on screens if he tries to get around them while Kopp is too many steps behind to contest shots. Again, neither is a plus defender.

When we actually run sets for P Stew he hits at a pretty good % while Kopp.. doesn't. Don't look at Kopp's win shares for conference play, it's horrendous. (this stat alone doesn't tell the whole story but paired with watching the games it's rather obvious)

Posted
14 minutes ago, Uspshoosier said:

St Johns up 20 with 5:44 min to go in the first half.   St. John’s needs this game badly.  

Just like that St.John's blows half their lead and then throws the ball away again.

Posted

St. John’s is running Seton Hall out of their own gym.  St. John’s up 24 with 6 min to go. 
 

if this score holds up it will be interesting to see how big of jump St Johns makes in the NET 

Posted
9 minutes ago, Uspshoosier said:

St. John’s is running Seton Hall out of their own gym.  St. John’s up 24 with 6 min to go. 
 

if this score holds up it will be interesting to see how big of jump St Johns makes in the NET 

They were 109 coming in so will obviously be inside 100.  low 90s?

Strange quad breakdown for them.  At 10-7, they were 0-6 in Q1 coming in, 3-0 in Q3, and 7-1 in Q4.  Not a single Q2 game.  That's a split that looks like Mike Davis's Texas Southern teams would have that would schedule tough P5 non conference road games and then get to their conference schedule.

Posted
14 minutes ago, Uspshoosier said:

St. John’s is running Seton Hall out of their own gym.  St. John’s up 24 with 6 min to go. 
 

if this score holds up it will be interesting to see how big of jump St Johns makes in the NET 

Yeah, that was an ownage from the beginning.  

I know that it was the first on-campus game there in like 40 years,  Have to say I see why.......that's a really, really bad gymnasium.  That wouldn't even make for a decent Indiana high school gym.

 

Posted

Don't understand how the review rule allows you to review in the last two minutes of regulation but then in OT it resets and you can't review until the last two minutes of OT.  There are so many needless reviews inside two minutes of blowouts but a lot of things that could use review in OT.

Posted

Goal tend call on Kansas.  Looked like a close but good call. 

Review on it?  Never knew that was reviewable.  If so, that's bad as it goes to the possession arrow if they overturn it.  Basically hands the ball back to Kansas despite them not actually getting the ball.

IMO, looked close but goal tend.  Certainly isn't clear cut.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...