Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Yea. They just used RPI. Which I don’t exactly agree with the Quad system. It’s too vague and not specific enough. Wins and losses mean way different things for teams. Playing a team that is 75th is considered a Q1 loss. But if Virginia loses at UC Irvine, people will perceive it as a bad loss but the NET considers it a loss that doesn’t matter. The NCAA definitely needs to work on the system and get away from trying to put a monopoly on a ratings system. Use them all and set standards.


Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners mobile app

You have to play that 75th on the road for it to be a Quad 1 loss


Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners mobile app
Posted

Has any team ever been invited to the tournament after suffering a 7 game losing streak, let alone following that up with a separate 5 game streak? Serious question. Just the 7 straight. Anyone know


Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners

Posted
Has any team ever been invited to the tournament after suffering a 7 game losing streak, let alone following that up with a separate 5 game streak? Serious question. Just the 7 straight. Anyone know


Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners

That will be tough to find but I will try


Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners mobile app
Posted
5 minutes ago, cappymo14 said:

Has any team ever been invited to the tournament after suffering a 7 game losing streak, let alone following that up with a separate 5 game streak? Serious question. Just the 7 straight. Anyone know


Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners

Yes, IU in 2019.

Posted
That will be tough to find but I will try

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners mobile app

I think it may be a little harder to find than I thought. Have to go through the full schedule for every team in the field. If you happen to come across something easily I’d be glad to hear about it, otherwise don’t wear yourself out looking brother. The reason I ask is, I remember watching a post game show on CBS a few years back, where the analysts were discussing the bracket viability of certain teams considered on the bubble. It popped into memory because the argument for a particular team was that although the team suffered 14 losses overall, they had never lost 3 in a row and only lost back to back games twice. The consensus from the panel was that it would give them an advantage over bubble teams with similar records, who could not claim the same. All metrics, quads and computations aside, that still gives me pause when it comes to decision time. Thing is, we don’t really know what the net is, or how it’s really used. We know some dudes computer model based on what little info the committee has leaked. I still say even with a win over OSU, it’s far from the lock some say it is. About 9 of those 12 games weren’t losses man, those were blowouts. Many on national tv. This is my opinion. Not trying to be negative in any way. I’m simply saying this....better keep winning.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners mobile app

 

Posted
I think it may be a little harder to find than I thought. Have to go through the full schedule for every team in the field. If you happen to come across something easily I’d be glad to hear about it, otherwise don’t wear yourself out looking brother. The reason I ask is, I remember watching a post game show on CBS a few years back, where the analysts were discussing the bracket viability of certain teams considered on the bubble. It popped into memory because the argument for a particular team was that although the team suffered 14 losses overall, they had never lost 3 in a row and only lost back to back games twice. The consensus from the panel was that it would give them an advantage over bubble teams with similar records, who could not claim the same. All metrics, quads and computations aside, that still gives me pause when it comes to decision time. Thing is, we don’t really know what the net is, or how it’s really used. We know some dudes computer model based on what little info the committee has leaked. I still say even with a win over OSU, it’s far from the lock some say it is. Those 12 games weren’t losses man, those were blowouts. Many on national tv. This is my opinion. Not trying to be negative in any way. I’m simply saying this....better keep winning.
 
 
Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners mobile app

Blowouts...? Losses, yes but not blowouts

@UM -11 not really that close
@Maryland -3 close most of the game
Vs. Nebraska -15 blowout, bad loss
@pu -15 blowout
@NW -7 bad loss
Vs Michigan -23 blowout, bad loss
@Rutger -8 bad loss
Vs. Iowa -5 late competitive loss
Vs. O$U -3 late competitive loss
@Minny -21 blowout
Vs. pu -2 competitive close loss
@iowa -6 OT loss


5 of those losses were blowouts. 5 of those games were late possession losses with some tough shots made. If you wanted to make an argument injuries played a big role you could. The team definitely showed lackluster effort in many too.


Sent from my iPad using BtownBanners mobile app
Posted

Blowouts...? Losses, yes but not blowouts

 

@UM -11 not really that close

@Maryland -3 close most of the game

Vs. Nebraska -15 blowout, bad loss

@pu -15 blowout

@NW -7 bad loss

Vs Michigan -23 blowout, bad loss

@Rutger -8 bad loss

Vs. Iowa -5 late competitive loss

Vs. O$U -3 late competitive loss

@Minny -21 blowout

Vs. pu -2 competitive close loss

@iowa -6 OT loss

 

 

5 of those losses were blowouts. 5 of those games were late possession losses with some tough shots made. If you wanted to make an argument injuries played a big role you could. The team definitely showed lackluster effort in many too.

 

 

Sent from my iPad using BtownBanners mobile app

Alright, yeah I get where you are coming from. I’m really honestly not trying to stir the pot. The double, multiple game losing streaks give me a legit hard time when I consider the team for placement regardless of who we beat. I understand that I cannot discount the fact that IU came up huge against some of the best, and obviously injuries matter. I just wonder how much really. Also, I’d like to argue that the Rutgers and NW losses should indeed be placed into the blowout category. Both of those teams held 15 and 14 point leads respectively, late in the 2nd half. Neither of those games were in doubt after halftime. IU had horrendous scoring droughts in each. I claim they were also blowouts, because the final score was deceiving. By my logic, That’s at least 7 of 12.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners mobile app

Posted
Alright, yeah I get where you are coming from. I’m really honestly not trying to stir the pot. The double, multiple game losing streaks give me a legit hard time when I consider the team for placement regardless of who we beat. I understand that I cannot discount the fact that IU came up huge against some of the best, and obviously injuries matter. I just wonder how much really. Also, I’d like to argue that the Rutgers and NW losses should indeed be placed into the blowout category. Both of those teams held 15 and 14 point leads respectively, late in the 2nd half. Neither of those games were in doubt after halftime. IU had horrendous scoring droughts in each. I claim they were also blowouts, because the final score was deceiving. By my logic, That’s at least 7 of 12.
 
 
Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners mobile app

Yes, they weren’t competitive in some and went through horrible scoring droughts but... the committee has a 10 point cap. They were also played without our current roster on the court.


Sent from my iPad using BtownBanners mobile app
Posted

Yes, they weren’t competitive in some and went through horrible scoring droughts but... the committee has a 10 point cap. They were also played without our current roster on the court.

 

 

Sent from my iPad using BtownBanners mobile app

I’ll agree on the injuries. Anderson forced to play minutes he wasn’t ready for, mixed with other erratic lineups thrown together to see what might stick. All adds up. I was really looking for other viewpoints to calm my troubled mind. If guys like you and USPS tell me not to worry....then I don’t worry.

 

Edit....I’d still say better just keep on winning though.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners mobile app

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...