Jump to content

Thanks for visiting BtownBanners.com!  We noticed you have AdBlock enabled.  While ads can be annoying, we utilize them to provide these forums free of charge to you!  Please consider removing your AdBlock for BtownBanners or consider signing up to donate and help BtownBanners stay alive!  Thank you!

BlueDevil

College Bball Thread

Recommended Posts

No way. We'd have 15 losses. An at-large bid is gone and has been for awhile now.

It won’t happen but there is a way..

Wiscy and MSU would be quad 1 wins, @Ill and Rutgers are quad 2 wins. That’s 17-14 in the regular season. If IU gets to the conference finals they’d most likely pick up a couple more quad 1 and a quad 2 win. At 20-15 with the wins they’d have they’d be in.


Sent from my iPad using BtownBanners mobile app

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It won’t happen but there is a way..

Wiscy and MSU would be quad 1 wins, @Ill and Rutgers are quad 2 wins. That’s 17-14 in the regular season. If IU gets to the conference finals they’d most likely pick up a couple more quad 1 and a quad 2 win. At 20-15 with the wins they’d have they’d be in.


Sent from my iPad using BtownBanners mobile app

Illinois is 4 spots away from that game being a Quad1


Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners mobile app

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
No way. We'd have 15 losses. An at-large bid is gone and has been for awhile now.

Joe Lunardi still had us in at 13-13 earlier this week. Conference record means zero when it comes to the selection process. This new NET system would work in our favor as we'd be in the top 15 in Quad 1 wins if we win out the regular season. The committee thinks highly of the B1G this year. If we go 17-14, we're in. Book it. Not gonna happen but we have a chance.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners mobile app

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, HoosierAloha said:


Who wouldn’t want to play us? We’ve lost 12 of 13, I’d think most teams in the conference would love to get a W in the conference tourney and add a quad 2 win.


Sent from my iPad using BtownBanners mobile app

I think they feel IU is a sleeping giant.  I smell revenge.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Joe Lunardi still had us in at 13-13 earlier this week. Conference record means zero when it comes to the selection process. This new NET system would work in our favor as we'd be in the top 15 in Quad 1 wins if we win out the regular season. The committee thinks highly of the B1G this year. If we go 17-14, we're in. Book it. Not gonna happen but we have a chance.
 
 
Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners mobile app

We’d need a minimum of 2 wins in the BTt though. That would depend on who we got matched up in our first and second games.


Sent from my iPad using BtownBanners mobile app

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Didn’t they lose at home to PSU today? I didn’t watch the end of it but they were getting beat. That would drop them a bit.


Sent from my iPad using BtownBanners mobile app

Not sure if they won or not I got it on the DVR to watch later but if they lost them year they will drop


Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners mobile app

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Joe Lunardi still had us in at 13-13 earlier this week. Conference record means zero when it comes to the selection process. This new NET system would work in our favor as we'd be in the top 15 in Quad 1 wins if we win out the regular season. The committee thinks highly of the B1G this year. If we go 17-14, we're in. Book it. Not gonna happen but we have a chance.
 
 
Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners mobile app

Lunardi would be the 68th seeded bracketoligist if there was a 68 seeded bracket. All of us bracketoligist project the field as if the season ended today so having them 13-13 and in just means that have really good top ended wins. From studying team sheets this week if IU finished 17-14 I wouldn’t like their chances regardless of how many quad 1 wins they have.


Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners mobile app

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The problem is that even with us winning out like that, we still went 8-12 in conference. Which the committee may not look at conference record, but at 8-12, they would look at it and say hell no.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners mobile app

If there was no conference tournament you are right they would say heck no but since there is a tournament if they went 8-12 and made the semi-finals or finals they would say heck yes depending on who they beat to get there

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners mobile app

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, HoosierAloha said:


And that’s what makes pretty good teams able to close out games they probably should have lost. It’s cool to be mentally tough and well coached but when you get a defensive stop because the ref doesn’t call a mugging it helps. When you get extra free throws down the stretch when you weren’t touched, it helps. So mentally tough and well coached helps a lot when you call the fouls.

It’s garbage and the conference suffers for it.


Sent from my iPad using BtownBanners mobile app

It’s like this with every conference. I agree that it shouldn’t be like that. Just how it goes though

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The problem is that even with us winning out like that, we still went 8-12 in conference. Which the committee may not look at conference record, but at 8-12, they would look at it and say hell no.


Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners mobile app

What...?

They may not (won’t) but they would look at it and say hell no. Makes perfect sense Joe.


Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners mobile app

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
29 minutes ago, Demo said:

Without Azubuike and Vick KU is in trouble. Without those guys they’re, what, the 4th best team in their conference?

They have actually been better without Vick. Azuibuike, however, was a big loss. A rim protector that they don't have now. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×