Jump to content

Thanks for visiting BtownBanners.com!  We noticed you have AdBlock enabled.  While ads can be annoying, we utilize them to provide these forums free of charge to you!  Please consider removing your AdBlock for BtownBanners or consider signing up to donate and help BtownBanners stay alive!  Thank you!

Banksyrules

They “Retired” Coach Woodson Thread

Recommended Posts

10 minutes ago, Hoosier2014 said:

I’m ready to be hurt again. What’s the odds Woody is the bridge to Stevens? And was this the plan all along? Stevens says not yet, give Woody a go and I’ll be ready when he retires. Probably pure delusion but why in the hell did Seth tweet that lol

I don’t think that was the plan all along. But I think it’s been said to keep contacting me and we’ll see if the time is right.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Way way way too early. Even the good RMK teams were ugly at times in the Hawaii Classics. IMO too many new players to start off with a bang in the Bahamas against good teams.
Not saying a bang but be competitive not look like we did vs auɓurn.

Sent from my SM-A146U using Tapatalk

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Chris007 said:

I don’t think that was the plan all along. But I think it’s been said to keep contacting me and we’ll see if the time is right.

I know it’s still a very long shot but do you think the people who back Woodson would also jump at the opportunity to get him?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, ap2345 said:

I still think if his kids had been older when Woodson was hired Brad Stevens would be the Indiana University head coach right now and not Mike Woodson.

Agreed. His son will be at ND this year and his daughter I think will be a junior in high school.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Hornsby said:

Not saying a bang but be competitive not look like we did vs auɓurn.

Sent from my SM-A146U using Tapatalk
 

I can live with that.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Chris007 said:

You know they both are starting.

I said a while back one thing that wouldn’t surprise me is if he landed a starting 5 and probably a good one. Maybe I am Trilly? Really makes you wonder how this would impact the guards we are pursing a la last spring. Clogged lane doesn’t usually equal creativity and slashing. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, IH8PU said:

Way way way too early. Even the good RMK teams were ugly at times in the Hawaii Classics. IMO too many new players to start off with a bang in the Bahamas against good teams.

I didn’t mean win it, just not get nuked by every top 25 team we play and win a few of them. Our best win last year was a loss to Kansas lol

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, OKHOOSIER said:

I said a while back one thing that wouldn’t surprise me is if he landed a starting 5 and probably a good one. Maybe I am Trilly? Really makes you wonder how this would impact the guards we are pursing a la last spring. Clogged lane doesn’t usually equal creativity and slashing. 

I tried to say that this morning on another thread and you would think I was making fun of people’s moms.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, OKHOOSIER said:

I didn’t mean win it, just not get nuked by every top 25 team we play and win a few of them. Our best win last year was a loss to Kansas lol

"throttle back" .... I never said you meant win it nor did I think you were saying that. IN FACT you quoted my answer to Hornsby's post, not yours.

image.thumb.png.173efac0a00e93be6d281091f8f1a797.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, IH8PU said:

"throttle back" .... I never said you meant win it nor did I think you were saying that. IN FACT you quoted my answer to Hornsby's post, not yours.

I know. I wasn’t attacking you my dude, just stating when I mentioned the Bahamas I meant more competitive not necessarily win it. I was too lazy to quote myself, and I am probably too much of a moron to do it on mobile. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The idea that Woodson critics did not think he'd be able to land some good players in the portal is unequivocally false.

In fact I'd say it's widely expected that he will land a good starting 5 considering the core has returned (and that NIL we've heard about)

How many portal additions are needed is subjective, apparently, and how good the final group is... remains to be seen. 

Lot of people celebrating. Yes landing Ballo Carlyle and Rice would be a phenomenal start to the portal. IMO, we need at least one more guard/perimeter defender/shooter. Then a back up big. Maybe Cupps hits the portal in which case you fill that spot no matter what. 

Assume we'll be moving onto 2nd and 3rd tier prospects on the staffs preferred list after the initial wave of visits. We'll see how it shakes out. Then we'll see how how they look next year. Not going to be any time for a learning curve. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The idea that Woodson critics did not think he'd be able to land some good players in the portal in unequivocally false.
In fact I'd say it's widely expected that he will land a good starting 5 considering the core has returned.
How many portal additions are needed is subjective, apparently, and how good the final group is... remains to be seen. 
Lot of people celebrating. Yes landing Ballo Carlyle and Rice would be a phenomenal start to the portal. IMO, we need at least one more guard/perimeter defender/shooter. Then a back up big. Maybe Cupps hits the portal in which case you fill that spot no matter what. 
Assume we'll be moving onto 2nd and 3rd tier prospects on the staffs preferred list after the initial wave of visits. We'll see how it shakes out. Then we'll see how how they look next year. Not going to be any time for a learning curve. 
I could see cupps maybe leaving his playing time will likely go way way down.

Sent from my SM-A146U using Tapatalk

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Home Jersey said:

The idea that Woodson critics did not think he'd be able to land some good players in the portal in unequivocally false.

In fact I'd say it's widely expected that he will land a good starting 5 considering the core has returned.

How many portal additions are needed is subjective, apparently, and how good the final group is... remains to be seen. 

Lot of people celebrating. Yes landing Ballo Carlyle and Rice would be a phenomenal start to the portal. IMO, we need at least one more guard/perimeter defender/shooter. Then a back up big. Maybe Cupps hits the portal in which case you fill that spot no matter what. 

Assume we'll be moving onto 2nd and 3rd tier prospects on the staffs preferred list after the initial wave of visits. We'll see how it shakes out. Then we'll see how how they look next year. Not going to be any time for a learning curve. 

And we are arguing over hypotheticals lol. We haven’t landed anyone yet. Let’s argue about the pieces once they play for IU. I like crystal balls as much as the next Hogwarts graduate, but until we know who we have this is all moot. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×