Ryno6284 Posted February 1, 2025 Posted February 1, 2025 1 minute ago, Uspshoosier said: No buts it’s Foxs attempt to make money so their TV deal conferences have to participate I believe. Nit is still ran by the ncaa Do you think it will be more likely teams don't turn down invites to this like NiT, or about the same? Will this be bigger deal than the NIT? Quote
johnsoniu Posted February 1, 2025 Posted February 1, 2025 17 minutes ago, Ryno6284 said: All SEC games are must watch, but Cal going back to BBN as the opposing coach should be interesting, to say the least. They had Pitino cut a promo urging the fans to give him the welcome he deserves for all the winning and a championship. The funniest part is at the start of the message he points out him and Cal aren’t friends. I can’t believe it but I’m gonna give BBN the benefit of the doubt and say he gets a warm ovation when introduced then gets razzed unmercifully during the game. Ryno6284 1 Quote
Uspshoosier Posted February 1, 2025 Posted February 1, 2025 33 minutes ago, Ryno6284 said: Do you think it will be more likely teams don't turn down invites to this like NiT, or about the same? Will this be bigger deal than the NIT? I have no clue. Im interested in seeing if the conference forces teams to play in it. I will be watching. More college basketball is never a bad thing RaceToTheTop, Ryno6284, Muskie plays the four and 1 other 3 1 Quote
RaceToTheTop Posted February 1, 2025 Posted February 1, 2025 Washington up 3 on MInnesota with 35.8 seconds left. Washington ball, full shot clock. Think Minnesota will have to foul. Quote
Ryno6284 Posted February 1, 2025 Posted February 1, 2025 Just now, RaceToTheTop said: Washington up 3 on MInnesota with 35.8 seconds left. Washington ball, full shot clock. Think Minnesota will have to foul. 6 sec difference Quote
RaceToTheTop Posted February 1, 2025 Posted February 1, 2025 Just now, Ryno6284 said: 6 sec difference Yep, just think MInnesota needs to extend the game. If not, Washington runs the shot clock down as far as possible and if Minnesota gets a rebound, Washington just fouls Quote
RaceToTheTop Posted February 1, 2025 Posted February 1, 2025 Washington with a horrible turnover, LOL. However, the review might overturn it -- looks like the Washington player got it out of his hands before his foot hit out of bounds. I believe if that is the case it goes to jump ball? If so, that means it would still be Washington ball. Quote
RaceToTheTop Posted February 1, 2025 Posted February 1, 2025 LOLOLOLOLOLOL The refs said the 'call was confirmed'. If anything, the best you could come up with was inconclusive and IMO he got it out of his hands. Quote
Ryno6284 Posted February 1, 2025 Posted February 1, 2025 Just now, RaceToTheTop said: Washington with a horrible turnover, LOL. However, the review might overturn it -- looks like the Washington player got it out of his hands before his foot hit out of bounds. I believe if that is the case it goes to jump ball? If so, that means it would still be Washington ball. IDK Minny had clear possession when they blew it dead. Quote
Ryno6284 Posted February 1, 2025 Posted February 1, 2025 Minny should change their name to the Golden Garcias, cause he is a one man team! RaceToTheTop 1 Quote
RaceToTheTop Posted February 1, 2025 Posted February 1, 2025 Just now, Ryno6284 said: IDK Minny had clear possession when they blew it dead. If that is the rule, then why bother reviewing if he was out or not? Personally, I'd be fine not using reviews. Quote
Ryno6284 Posted February 1, 2025 Posted February 1, 2025 Providence storming back to within 1, 2:19 to go! Delivering! Sorry USPS, had to use that one! lol Uspshoosier 1 Quote
Ryno6284 Posted February 1, 2025 Posted February 1, 2025 2 minutes ago, RaceToTheTop said: If that is the rule, then why bother reviewing if he was out or not? Personally, I'd be fine not using reviews. I agree, it is over used and is hindering the game! RaceToTheTop 1 Quote
RaceToTheTop Posted February 1, 2025 Posted February 1, 2025 Minnesota bucket followed by Washington hitting two free throws after a foul. Minnesota ball, down 3, 9.7 seconds left. Gonna need a three to tie but Washington can foul. Personally, at 9.7 seconds, I foul in the back court if I'm Washington and worry about the possibility of giving of the three later. ANd they do. Quote
RaceToTheTop Posted February 1, 2025 Posted February 1, 2025 Garcia misses the second (looked unintentional). Washington to the line to ice it. Quote
johnsoniu Posted February 1, 2025 Posted February 1, 2025 Just now, Ryno6284 said: I agree, it is over used and is hindering the game! Its being used as extra timouts during overly lengthy reviews. Make the players stay on the court, not huddled up at the bench drawing up plays. And for god’s sake put a time limit on the review BannerVille, LIHoosier and Ryno6284 2 1 Quote
RaceToTheTop Posted February 1, 2025 Posted February 1, 2025 .Washington gets their first Big Ten win. EDIT: first Big Ten road win Quote
Ryno6284 Posted February 1, 2025 Posted February 1, 2025 1 minute ago, johnsoniu said: Its being used as extra timouts during overly lengthy reviews. Make the players stay on the court, not huddled up at the bench drawing up plays. And for god’s sake put a time limit on the review Baseball is figuring out how to speed games up and basketball is figuring out how to make them take longer! Who woulda thunk? WayneFleekHoosier and johnsoniu 1 1 Quote
Ryno6284 Posted February 1, 2025 Posted February 1, 2025 If you aren't there, get to St. Johns and Providence RIGHT NOW! Tied 32 secs left! Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.