Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
4 minutes ago, RaceToTheTop said:

Seems like ESPN likes to cite Joe Lunardi's bracketology as 'gospel'......said if Mississippi loses tonight that they become the first team out and Gonzaga the last team in (according to Lunardi).

Always been that way.   Drives me crazy every time they do it but they pay the guy a lot to be the most recognizable bracketologist so they like to get their moneys worth.  Just like when they pushed BPI as the metric of choice since it’s their metric.    Glad they toned that down over the years 

Posted
4 minutes ago, Uspshoosier said:

Always been that way.   Drives me crazy every time they do it but they pay the guy a lot to be the most recognizable bracketologist so they like to get their moneys worth.  Just like when they pushed BPI as the metric of choice since it’s their metric.    Glad they toned that down over the years 

Yep.  That said, I do know that Mississippi's metrics despite their 19-6 record aren't what the committee likes.  They do have 3 quad 1 wins but 15 of their 19 wins are quad 3 and 4.  Kind of a mixed bag of a schedule left -- right now down 8 at Mississippi State which would be a quad 1 loss.  Games left are South Carolina (quad 2), Alabama (quad 1), at Missouri (quad 3), at Georgia (quad 2), Texas A&M (quad 2).  Current NET is 67 which is more likely out than in.  If they lose tonight and only win two of their last five that  would put them at 21-10 overall but with poor efficiency metrics and not really that strong of an schedule.

Posted
1 minute ago, RaceToTheTop said:

Yep.  That said, I do know that Mississippi's metrics despite their 19-6 record aren't what the committee likes.  They do have 3 quad 1 wins but 15 of their 19 wins are quad 3 and 4.  Kind of a mixed bag of a schedule left -- right now down 8 at Mississippi State which would be a quad 1 loss.  Games left are South Carolina (quad 2), Alabama (quad 1), at Missouri (quad 3), at Georgia (quad 2), Texas A&M (quad 2).  Current NET is 67 which is more likely out than in.  If they lose tonight and only win two of their last five that  would put them at 21-10 overall but with poor efficiency metrics and not really that strong of a schedule.

Definitely.  I don’t have Ole Miss in as of now 

Posted
1 minute ago, Uspshoosier said:

Definitely.  I don’t have Ole Miss in as of now 

My ratings like them but I know what I give value doesn't rate as high to the committee.  They've accumulated wins and I rate wins v. overall schedule and what specific teams you won and lost or margin of victory.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...