Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
55 minutes ago, MikeRoberts said:

I appreciate these too.

you did these a bit last season, how accurate were they?

I'd have to go back and look to be sure...I don't know.  I remember that they predicted when Purdue came to IU and no one gave IU a chance that the sim thought it was going to be very competitive....however, it certainly missed on both Rutgers games last year.

FWIW, I ran IU/Nebraska prior to the game but didn't post it as it didn't include the Creighton/Nebraska numbers.  IU averaged a 17 point win against Nebraska, 79-62 (that assumed JHS and Griesel were both playing).   IU won 9 of the 10 sims.

Posted

Hits the first free throw, Xavier up 1 with 1.4 seconds.  Timeout.

IMO, he should intentionally miss the second.  Cincinnati has to go the length of the court and is going to shoot a desperation shot anyway and has no timeouts.

Posted

Xavier shooter missed intentionally...Cinciny called time out but some confusion......scoreboard said Cincy didn't have any left but scorer said they did.  Looks like they will have the ball with 0.9 seconds.

Posted
5 minutes ago, RaceToTheTop said:

Nevermind, Cincy did NOT have a time out.  Xavier hits two free throws.  Up 3.  Cincinnati ball out of bounds 0.9 seconds.

They pulled a Chris Webber.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...