Bracketology and Team Resumes

[RaceToTheTop 26,313]

Seems very weird to me that IU only moved up one spot in NET with the win at Ohio State.

Team sheet is showing good results based metrics (wins/losses) but not good predictive based metrics.

Results based:  KPI 28, SOR 35, WAB 35

Predictive based:  BPI 61, POM 58, T-Rank 62

FWIW, Torvik's ten most recent resumes similar to Indiana's current resume saw five teams in the tournament and five teams miss.  The ones that did make it were seeded 10 to 12 except for Boston College in 2009 which had a 7 seed (probably well over seeded).  The teams in the last 10 years with the resumes most similar to Indiana were Arizona State in 2023 (11 seed, play in round, won play in game, lost round of 64);  Michigan State 2021 (11th seed, play in round, lost);  and TCU 2019 (missed tournament).  

 

[HoosierHoopster 7,233]

41 minutes ago, RaceToTheTop said:

Seems very weird to me that IU only moved up one spot in NET with the win at Ohio State.

Team sheet is showing good results based metrics (wins/losses) but not good predictive based metrics.

Results based:  KPI 28, SOR 35, WAB 35

Predictive based:  BPI 61, POM 58, T-Rank 62

FWIW, Torvik's ten most recent resumes similar to Indiana's current resume saw five teams in the tournament and five teams miss.  The ones that did make it were seeded 10 to 12 except for Boston College in 2009 which had a 7 seed (probably well over seeded).  The teams in the last 10 years with the resumes most similar to Indiana were Arizona State in 2023 (11 seed, play in round, won play in game, lost round of 64);  Michigan State 2021 (11th seed, play in round, lost);  and TCU 2019 (missed tournament).  

 

In summary, we’ve got work to do