Jump to content

Thanks for visiting BtownBanners.com!  We noticed you have AdBlock enabled.  While ads can be annoying, we utilize them to provide these forums free of charge to you!  Please consider removing your AdBlock for BtownBanners or consider signing up to donate and help BtownBanners stay alive!  Thank you!

ccgeneral

IU Men's Soccer News and Notes

Recommended Posts

Hoosiers (12-5-1) will host St. Louis (11-2-7) on Sunday at noon.  Televised on ESPN+.  We defeated St. Louis 1-0 in Bloomington back on Sept. 3.  Current weather forecast is great.  Sunny, temp in the low 50's, wind light and variable.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This will be the Battle of Champions, so to speak -- pitting the winningest NCAA men's soccer programs: 

Saint Louis: 10 nattys (1959, '60, '62, '63, '65, '67, '69, '70, '72, '73) 

IU: 8 nattys (1982, '82, '88, '98, '99, '03, '04, '12) 

Next: Virginia (7); Clemson, Maryland, UCLA, San Fran (4 each)

giphy.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Brass Cannon said:

Full disclosure I’m not watching the game but we haven’t had a SOG since they scored their goal.  Not sure that’s the response I would want 

It somewhat died down on both sides, but IU has gained some momentum compared to SLU 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There was always the chance the offense could win them a title, or the defense and goalkeeping could cost them their first game. Right now, they have one half to try to keep it from being the negative one.

Regardless, they must find a top-level goalie and a couple more backline players in the offseason. SLU is the anti-IU with an elite D and goalie, and minimal attack. 

While Brown and the SLU goalie had similar chances with tough but savable shots, the SLU guy made them all, and Brown could not bail his side out and reason it is 1-0 bad guys. While the D is the primary culprit in the goal, the lack of being able to be bailed out by a top-flight keeper, as SLU was, is the difference.

Whether it is Michelle who has promise but is raw, or a portal or elite freshman guy, this level of keeping meets many sides' standards, but not IU. If the Hoosiers want to remain elite, this is a must-fix. The evaluation of Brown I see with his size, but it was a clear misevaluation for the elite awareness needed and must be addressed in the offseason to be a serious contender.

Not mad at IU, but a clear upgrade and correction is needed to be a serious contender going forward as well as plugging a hole or two on the backline. While ideally you want both size and awareness, I'll take Harms' awareness last year and lack of size over Brown's inverse any day.

Brown is a finished product who rivals only Souderland in 2013 and Caulfield in early 2019 in terms of awareness issues. Michelle is either that or Louis Soffener, who was awful his first couple of years due to Freitag being an awful coach, and Yeagley developed him into a top-level goalie by the end.

We will know by next year if Michelle has the awareness and if he does Yeagley will get it out of him. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Hoosierfan1901 said:

It somewhat died down on both sides, but IU has gained some momentum compared to SLU 

I don’t buy into the momentum argument it’s not resulting in SOG letting us possess the ball before forcing a turnover or a bad shot not on goal is playing into their hands 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×