Jump to content

Thanks for visiting BtownBanners.com!  We noticed you have AdBlock enabled.  While ads can be annoying, we utilize them to provide these forums free of charge to you!  Please consider removing your AdBlock for BtownBanners or consider signing up to donate and help BtownBanners stay alive!  Thank you!

Sign in to follow this  
IU Hoosier41

Official Indiana @ Minnesota Game Thread

Recommended Posts

Is it too much to ask for 5 consistent players?  Evan and Stan were maddening tonight.  

 

The positive tonight though was definitely Jeremy and Hanner.  Glad to see those two have a really nice game and play within themselves. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[quote name="CR3AMnCR1MS0N" post="36358" timestamp="1391916950"]I just said I was mad. To me it just felt like some bad breaks and defensive breakdowns as a team down the stretch. Not any individual player.


Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners[/quote]

No I'm not singling anybody out. I'm just as mad as you, but some people tend to not think before they speak after these types of games.


Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[quote name="JSHoosier" post="36360" timestamp="1391917038"]Then why the hell was Evan in?[/quote]

Overall, a better choice. Evan doesn't dribble with his head down directly into the defense every time. He's been more consistent in the past. Stan is a diamond in the rough, just needs polished. Evan has (in the past) had a sense of leadership, and a 3 pt threat. Granted, it didn't materialize tonight


Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners mobile app

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[quote name="J_Smiff" post="36363" timestamp="1391917163"]Stan and Evan both sucked tonight, who did you want, Marlin?[/quote]

I suggest Hollowell. Unless he was in, I was only paying attention to the ball, so don't kill me if he was already in.


Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Overall, a better choice. Evan doesn't dribble with his head down directly into the defense every time. He's been more consistent in the past. Stan is a diamond in the rough, just needs polished. Evan has (in the past) had a sense of leadership, and a 3 pt threat. Granted, it didn't materialize tonight


Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners mobile app

I don't call a guy that shoots 35% from deep a 3 point threat.  That's a guy I play just tight enough defense on to keep him from having all day to shoot.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Maybe give Jeremy more minutes who actually had a good first half, instead of relying on Gordon in a close game when he hasn't been much of a shooter in his entire college career.

 

 

I suggest Hollowell. Unless he was in, I was only paying attention to the ball, so don't kill me if he was already in.


Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners

 

We needed two ball handlers on the floor, especially with the way they were pressing.  Mathieu and Hollins would have ran circles around Jeremy or Will too.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[quote name="J_Smiff" post="36372" timestamp="1391917572"]We needed two ball handlers on the floor, especially with the way they were pressing. Mathieu and Hollins would have ran circles around Jeremy or Will too.[/quote]

Without a stop there, needing ballhandlers is irrelevant. I'd go defense first then worry about getting the ball up the floor. They would run circles around just about anybody gambling on a steal like Evan did.


Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We needed two ball handlers on the floor, especially with the way they were pressing.  Mathieu and Hollins would have ran circles around Jeremy or Will too.

With some of the possessions we had with Evan as our primary ball handler he wasn't really doing anything. I get wanting to have another ball handler in the game, but Evan never really showed much in terms of doing anything offensively in the game, and defensively it would have made sense to have other guys in the game ahead of him

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Couldn't get on all game.  Or last game.  Not complaining yet but starting to wonder if I'm getting locked out, considering there are 14 pages in this thread.  Hope you can get it fixed.  Gotta suck for you guys.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Seriously guys.  We may have a very, VERY special guest tonight.  No guarantees, but if it happens (is possible), you will know it when you see it.  We expect those to be on their best behavior to this person IF it happens.  No exceptions.  We will draw the line on this, because things like this don't happen often.  I am assuming it will be someone who may not be as active, but will lie in the weeds.  The powers that be can attest to that, but we will look out for the best interests of that person.  

 

 

just figured it out, duh. lyss

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[quote name="cappymo14" post="36400" timestamp="1391920797"]Couldn't get on all game. Or last game. Not complaining yet but starting to wonder if I'm getting locked out, considering there are 14 pages in this thread. Hope you can get it fixed. Gotta suck for you guys.[/quote]

Looks like a couple posts were lost in translation over to the new server. We addressed this before, but we should be good to go now.


Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×