FightFor6

Rabjohns knows nothing. He's just regurgitating the names message board posters are discussing the most.

Wow a MCDAA wasn't interested in playing at Mississippi? Hard hitting insight from Rabby.

I probably missed it in the nearly 2000 pages, but why isn't Todd Golden brought up more here? Someone mentioned warm weather at some point, but I can't imagine $7-8M can't change minds there. Buy a second house if you want.

Maybe they'll hang a banner for him at his favorite bar in Oxford.

Great quote. Entirely way too much pointing.

Yeah. Color me shocked a UM guy thinks someone would never leave UM for another school. That's their baseline.

I'm not policing beliefs. Everyone can cling on to whatever dream scenario they want. Doesn't mean a dose of realism isn't warranted. The Oats picture is a relic from the last search. Paints a pretty sad picture that we keep finding ourselves in this position.

It's crashed. You're just too far inland to see it.

We need IP bans if this doesn't come to fruition.

The suit thing I never understood. Didn't he get outfitted with custom suits by AD on the square? Why did those things always fit so horribly.

I don't agree. The person sharing what they have heard is simply that and should be taken at face value. If someone is going to refute what that person heard, I believe that they would need to prove it wrong to be able to say it was false. That's not how the information was presented. It was posted as factual events that the poster is using to keep faith in BS being hired. Any person could concoct an elaborate story to justify any opinion and your stance is its on someone else to refute it with fact? We're not going to agree here.

I wasn't the one saying that everything around it is true. He stated that none of it is true. I feel that that puts the burden of proof on him.... The burden of proof is on the poster throwing out a dozen lines of information as fact. It's reasonable to be skeptical about the post, especially when actual statements from the primary character contradict what is shared.

How would you even know that nothing about it is true? How would you know it is? Information doesn't become more credible because it's what you want you hear.

You could have also told me it was a quote from a post 4 years ago and I would have had a hard time refuting it. It's kind of insane how much people are falling for this again.

The reaction it garners from a message board. I'm largely kidding here. I appreciate everything that is brought to the board based on what people are hearing. At the same time, these posts are a near exact duplication of the narrative from 4 years ago. I will believe it when I see it. If it happens, I'll never have been happier to be wrong.