FightFor6

The suit thing I never understood. Didn't he get outfitted with custom suits by AD on the square? Why did those things always fit so horribly.

I don't agree. The person sharing what they have heard is simply that and should be taken at face value. If someone is going to refute what that person heard, I believe that they would need to prove it wrong to be able to say it was false. That's not how the information was presented. It was posted as factual events that the poster is using to keep faith in BS being hired. Any person could concoct an elaborate story to justify any opinion and your stance is its on someone else to refute it with fact? We're not going to agree here.

I wasn't the one saying that everything around it is true. He stated that none of it is true. I feel that that puts the burden of proof on him.... The burden of proof is on the poster throwing out a dozen lines of information as fact. It's reasonable to be skeptical about the post, especially when actual statements from the primary character contradict what is shared.

How would you even know that nothing about it is true? How would you know it is? Information doesn't become more credible because it's what you want you hear.

You could have also told me it was a quote from a post 4 years ago and I would have had a hard time refuting it. It's kind of insane how much people are falling for this again.

The reaction it garners from a message board. I'm largely kidding here. I appreciate everything that is brought to the board based on what people are hearing. At the same time, these posts are a near exact duplication of the narrative from 4 years ago. I will believe it when I see it. If it happens, I'll never have been happier to be wrong.

Jay Wright it is then..

Yet you brought an obscure tweet from a guy with less than 300 followers to a board full of IU fans foaming at the mouth for Stevens news. Just kidding. Kind of. ;)

Not sure I buy this. They had to announce something or else the Michigan game would have been an absolute bloodbath. The brand comes before any individual and not taking action would have been too damaging.

No offense to anyone here, but if you agree Cronin would be a good to great hire, why would anyone care about buy-out cost? It's not our/your money anyway.

Well it's definitely not Cuinn with a Q so maybe it's Kindy with a C? What say you Khris?

That's basically the definition of a targeting call.

I also don't think you can use career metrics for X when he was nonexistent last year. Sure, if you got the best version of X the trade-off might be neutral. But if that had been the case we would have solidly been in the tournament and a good candidate to win a game or two.

Wrong thread. What does that have to do with complaining about dominant big men anyway? You'd rather have an inferior stretch big?

The national championship just featured 2 bigs that meet this description.