Jump to content

Thanks for visiting BtownBanners.com!  We noticed you have AdBlock enabled.  While ads can be annoying, we utilize them to provide these forums free of charge to you!  Please consider removing your AdBlock for BtownBanners or consider signing up to donate and help BtownBanners stay alive!  Thank you!

BlueDevil

College Bball Thread

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, Uspshoosier said:

Tough, tough guard.   Plays hard 

And even with a down shooting year it can't be emphasized enough how good he is.  He does all.the.little.things -- gets to the line, plays great defense, and never turns the ball over.  Now has 101 assists to 24 turnovers.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Uspshoosier said:

Blowing out Baylor on a neutral court is by far their biggest win.  They are very lucky they scheduled ISU on a buy game and that win right now is a top 22 win.  SOS top 15 

Luckily for them, the NET hands out a ton of moral victories. Which is why their net ranking is so high.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, Loaded Chicken Sandwich said:

Luckily for them, the NET hands out a ton of moral victories. Which is why their net ranking is so high.

Same as rpi, Kenpom etc.    not just the Net 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Uspshoosier said:

SOR.  Strength of Record 

Which is still incredibly flawed. Because it still just takes into account the rest of flawed system used. Eventually, something else will be created. Maybe. I think the NCAA likes the NET because they don't have to explain and give out the formula(because I fully believe they rig the absolute hell out of everything they do).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Loaded Chicken Sandwich said:

Isn't a rating system yet that puts a real penalty on actually losing.

My WAR system does -- the only efficiency rating used is to gauge the value of a team's opponent.  The margin of victory will not effect a team and all losses result in a drop in war and all wins result in an increase in WAR.  Win values range from +.03 to +.97;  loss values range from -.05 to -.95.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Uspshoosier said:

Washington st gets a win at Oregon or so I’m told it was on the PAC 12 network so who knows if anyone saw it.   Washington St has put themselves in position to get an at large 

About like a blade of grass falling in the yard. No one actually knows.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, RaceToTheTop said:

My WAR system does -- the only efficiency rating used is to gauge the value of a team's opponent.  The margin of victory will not effect a team and all losses result in a drop in war and all wins result in an increase in WAR.  Win values range from +.03 to +.97;  loss values range from -.05 to -.95.

Where is Michigan State in your rankings?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Loaded Chicken Sandwich said:

43-55 seems a bit more accurate for them.

Results based systems.   Sparty isn’t the only team that has a big gap in the predictives and results based numbers.   Those teams are always hard to seed 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×