24 second shot clock.

[KingPG21 6,587]

I agree totally. Watch a good NBA team/game, remove prior bias and be amazed. It truly is world class when done well. I.e San Antonio would be a good example.

Granted if a team has a once a decade player either college or NBA, you're going to see more one on one from those teams because the coaches are smart. If you have a player THAT great, then put them in a position to score until the other team proves they can stop him. Hell, everyone loves coach K, but if you watched Duke this year, it looked like a one man show all day. They won when Jabari was hot and lost when he was cold.

My point is, some people need to watch more NBA, without bias.

I have already agreed 24 may be too short but 28 or 30 would serve everyone's interest.

Even then with the Heat having that once in a generation type player, LBJ, they still run a lot of sets offensively. Granted a lot of them are centered around him and the focus is for him to create, but other guys are running their sets around him so they are in position when he breaks down the defense

[myboysinred 2]

IMO I don't think a 24 shot clock is going to work. College ball seems to get a lot of shot clock violations with 35. What's going to happen if we drop to 24? It will be a huge mess. Keep it 35.


Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners

[KB0 827]

I hate the argument to change the shot clock. Dropping the shot clock down from 35 to 30 or even 24 would more likely increase turnovers than anything else.

[WayneFleekHoosier 48,467]

They would assimilate.  There would be an increase in turnovers to start but it would iron itself out with GREAT coaching.