American HoosierX

Did they change it? He’s a part of the “other freshmen to watch” when I click on the link.

I'm sure I'll get roasted for this, but if you're going to call out his wife then take the time to get it right. He's two full letters off with the spelling.

Below that is a story about a recruit named Jizzle James...lol.

Are we talking freshman year OG? I would expect Race/JG to equal that level of production or more, while maybe not quite having the same ceiling defensively.

Stefanovich had his role, but he killed Purdue on defense last year.

To be fair, I went to grad school from '13 to '15, maybe it's improved. One game I distinctly remember was against UT Arlington and I swear the stands were ~15% full.

I don't know, I went to UT for grad school and went to a few basketball games. If they weren't playing a big-name team, the stands were laughably empty.

Because amazing weather and beautiful landscapes are so terrible.

Agreed. Stewart almost never hit a shot when it mattered, especially at the end of the year. And past the midway point, I would venture to say XJ was the better shooter percentage-wise.

Yep agreed. Which is why I said "in 3 of those games" instead of "3 games" The same math would work in reverse for losing all the games, hence my point.

I'd say we have a 50% chance or better of winning in 3 of those games (sans Kansas), so I don't think I'd say we could easily lose all 4. Unless you would also say you could easily see us win all 4, which honestly is probably more likely (although also not very likely).

Saying something like "his performance was absolute trash" makes it about his play rather than appearing to be about him as a person. I'm sure that wasn't your intent, but it kind of comes off that way.

People that clearly never took finite math. Even if you have a 75% chance of winning every game, over the course of 30 games it's about a 1 in 10k chance that you go undefeated.

I know this is facetious but it reminds how many people were throwing out an undefeated season as a real possibility in 12-13.

I've seen them ranked top 20 in some pre-season rankings, so yeah I would say they are pretty similar to us (pretty consistently ranked ~15). Plus the Armaan Franklin storyline would be an interesting one.

Not a believer in the Illinois newcomers? One poll I saw ranked them ahead of us post-TJD decision.

What do you gain from saying this publicly as opposed to just telling your teammates?

Agreed, everyone said he'd be a great fit at Georgia and he was spectacularly bad.

Did I miss something?

Bell did not test well at all at the combine.

Or as one of my fraternity brothers called it, bringing a sack lunch to an all-you-can-eat buffet.

OK I understand the concept in theory, but again I think it would only benefit a select few. If you are a player who isn't guaranteed to cover the cost of the scholarship, then you aren't going to participate. It just doesn't make sense for you to do extra work for nothing. Then NIL dollars are either not earned or redistributed to the guys that are guaranteed to out-earn their scholarship costs. If that plays out, it would ultimately recoup very little in terms of scholarship costs. Add in all the extra administrative work due to the extra rules, accounting, etc. and you may even end up spending more than you're recouping scholarship costs. I admit, this relies on the assumption that most players in college basketball wouldn't out-earn their scholarships

How do you propose this be run then? The only way the situation you described makes sense is if the player is making more from the NIL than the value of the scholarship. Otherwise it's like your employer telling you, "Hey were going to give you some additional responsibilities, but we're going to pay you more. However, that additional payment will be deducted from what we're contributing to your health insurance." Net net you are in the same economic situation with additional responsibilities. Why would anyone take that deal?

At IU or in general? I can think of non-IU players like Evan Eschmeyer.

Well that’s incredibly dumb. If the student doesn’t make more than the value of the scholarship then it becomes completely pointless, and only a select few would benefit.