Jump to content

Thanks for visiting BtownBanners.com!  We noticed you have AdBlock enabled.  While ads can be annoying, we utilize them to provide these forums free of charge to you!  Please consider removing your AdBlock for BtownBanners or consider signing up to donate and help BtownBanners stay alive!  Thank you!






Sign in to follow this  

Analysis: Was Big Ten disrespected with NCAA seedings?


IndyHutch
  • If you look at the Big Ten's seeds Sunday, you could make an argument that all were about one line below what had been expected. Here is my take on it and what Tom Crean had to say Sunday night.

So what did we learn Sunday night when the brackets were revealed on CBS’s marathon Selection Sunday Show?

 

We learned that the Big Ten was not taken very seriously by the committee.

 

Michigan State was a 2. Indiana, Purdue and Maryland were all 5 seeds. Iowa and Wisconsin were all on the 7 lines. Michigan is in a play-in game and playing for an 11 spot.

 

I think Tom Crean was a little taken aback by it when Indiana appeared on the screen as a No. 5 seed despite having won the Big Ten outright title by two full games.

 

When we got to speak to Crean and a few players Sunday night in the press room at Assembly Hall, I asked the Indiana coach if he was surprised where the Hoosiers were seeded?

 

I think his read-between-the-lines answer was pretty clear.

 

“The only thing I’m really excited about is I was smart enough to bring our Big Ten Championship trophy down to the room into the team room,’’ Crean said. “I’m glad it was down there because we needed a quick visual reminder that we were a Big Ten champion.

 

“So I’ll leave that for other people to talk about.’’

 

Crean said he is proud of what this team has accomplished. He said there was no question about that. But he believed what Indiana had done within the context of conference play should have amounted to more in the end. At least that’s what his read-between-the-lines answer seemed to indicate.

 

“Villanova went 8-1 on the road in their league,’’ Crean said. “Ourselves, Michigan State, Kansas, people like that, we went 6-3 on the road in our leagues. We’ve gone through a tough league and I’m proud of the way these guys earned their championship.’’

 

I think Crean was expecting a little bit more to be given to the outright Big Ten champs.

 

“In the last couple of years I know we were a 1 seed after we won it,’’ Crean said. “I know Michigan was a 2 seed after they won it. I know Wisconsin was a 1 seed after they won it. I don’t have much more to add other than that. I saw John Calipari’s interview with ESPN and he said you’ve got to play the games. He’s exactly right, so here we go.’’

 

I asked Nick Zeisloft if he felt like the Big Ten would head into the NCAA Tournament with a bit of a chip on its shoulder after the way the seeding turned out.

 

“I mean, seeding-wise it might look like that, but it’s such a great conference anyways,’’ Zeisloft said. “We know it’s a battle-tested conference. It’s a great one and teams are going to see that in the conference.’’

 

NOTE: BtownBanners will have extensive coverage of the Hoosiers this week beginning Monday with a look at Chattanooga.

 

I will be in on site in Des Moines to bring Btown Banners multiple articles and analysis during the week.

Sign in to follow this  


User Feedback

Recommended Comments



If you recall the 13 season, were we not the #1 overall seed?

Another poor BTT cost us. If we win that thing we are probably #1 overall and maybe things end differently.

Share this comment


Link to comment
Share on other sites
I had a guy at work tell me illinois was a 5 seed in march madness tournament when they won the big ten with Devin Williams and company. That doesn't sound right to me . I think they were a 1 or 2 seed in the dance that year they lost to UNC.

Share this comment


Link to comment
Share on other sites
Here is the 2005 seeds;

The Final Four consisted of Illinois, the overall top seed and in the Final Four for the first time since 1989, Louisville, making their first appearance since winning the national championship in 1986, North Carolina, reaching their first Final Four since their 2000 Cinderella run, and Michigan State, back in the Final Four for the first time since 2001.

Share this comment


Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's what I thought. We have to be the worst seed ever held by a big ten regular season champ .

Then let's go out and force their respect and prove them wrong!

Share this comment


Link to comment
Share on other sites

I looked at the Sagarin ratings and:

IU was ranked higher than 3/4 of the three seeds
IU was ranked higher than 3/4 of the four seeds (UK was the four ranked above us).
Both IU and UK should have had higher seeds.

On the other side of the coin....of the 4 twelve seeds Chattanooga is the lowest rated.
Better get past that game.

On top of this from Sagarin, Kenpom has Chatanooga worse than all the other 12 seeds, all the 13 seeds, 2 of the 14 seeds, 1 of the 15 seeds....

Share this comment


Link to comment
Share on other sites



Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
















×