Jump to content

rcbowla

Senior Member
  • Posts

    5,660
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by rcbowla

  1. Me!!!!! Can't go through that again Sent from my SM-G996U using Tapatalk
  2. I think you're absolutely correct on all counts. Bell's firing was on him (shouldn't have been hired) and Jackson over Sorsby was Allen or IU beating out Bell's choice. Sent from my SM-G996U using Tapatalk
  3. Still could be. Get the right coach and offer the right amount. Time to start taking this football idea seriously. Sent from my SM-G996U using Tapatalk
  4. I feel like Banks deserves more minutes right now. He has been a plus for us. I also noticed Cupps (didn't have a great night) was listening about guards rebounding. He was really attacking the boards tonight. Sent from my SM-G996U using Tapatalk
  5. I'll agree on attempts tonight that were "intended" to be 3's. Reality is we still only attempted 16 actual 3's. It has been a trend that is holding us back. Now let's roll with what was intended. That only supports that theory because, as you said, Ware and Reneau did dominate inside tonight. Bottom line is that this team is capable enough to be attempting 18-23 3's per night. Being ranked 343rd in attempts is a formula for losing. Sent from my SM-G996U using Tapatalk
  6. Yeah I know but still. You go from 60-6 coach in B1G as your guy to 16-9 in the ACC??? Sent from my SM-G996U using Tapatalk
  7. Against Harvard......Harvard. He's not wrong. Take more, hopefully make more, and the defense is at least considering it as a threat. That means more room for Ware and Reneau inside. We have guys that can make them but hard to get a rhythm when you only get 2 attempts per game as a shooter. Sent from my SM-G996U using Tapatalk
  8. They went from Ryan Day to Elko? Uhhhh....... Sent from my SM-G996U using Tapatalk
  9. I mean, sadly, you might be right. At least you could make the argument that he may do better not being in the proverbial fish bowl. Less pressure better results? The argument to that is FAU lol Sent from my SM-G996U using Tapatalk
  10. I'd argue he under-performed at UT. 7-6 10-4 8-5 7-3 That's what he did at a school that takes football stupidly serious and had everything at his disposal. Now put him at IU where that is all opposite of UT what do you think you'll get? Sent from my SM-G996U using Tapatalk
  11. This IU team is just not very good. Going to take a lot to get to the tournament and right now it looks bleak. Sent from my SM-G996U using Tapatalk
  12. And why isn't that a tech? Thought that was instituted a few years back Sent from my SM-G996U using Tapatalk
  13. Good to see MM getting some shots to fall Sent from my SM-G996U using Tapatalk
  14. I suppose that's fair to a point but he had the Raiders improving every year when he returned. And it's not as if he was unknown while he was out of coaching. He was on prime time broadcasts and was still being regarded as a great coach all the while. Many teams during that duration were rumored to have him as their top choice. Sent from my SM-G996U using Tapatalk
  15. Why? Because of his scandal or whatever you want to call it? If that's the hold up then that's just silly. Dude could bring immediate juice and talent. He could win from day 1 and have the program rocking. Now if it's him not wanting it then I totally get it lol. Sent from my SM-G996U using Tapatalk
  16. I wouldn't hate this hire but I think we can do better imo. Sent from my SM-G996U using Tapatalk
  17. This would be assuming Gruden is not a realistic option. Sent from my SM-G996U using Tapatalk
  18. I think Jon Sumrall with a good OC hire would be my top choice. Like I said before I can get behind quite a few guys and my top choice has changed about a dozen times over last couple days lol Sent from my SM-G996U using Tapatalk
  19. I was the best at predicting the misery that was the '23 IU FB season! Thanks@LIHoosier. Sent from my SM-G996U using Tapatalk
  20. There are several I'd be happy with. Fritz, Mullen, Chryst, Sumrall, Dickert, Cignetti and Fitzgerald would be at the top for me right now. Sent from my SM-G996U using Tapatalk
  21. His delivery sucks but his point is solid imo. The donor that holds their $ for a FB coach buyout would eventually use that $ towards something else to help the program if there were no need for a buyout right? I would assume said donor would be happy with 10 years of success under one coach and donate that alloted $ towards facilities or whatever that would help continue and enhance the program. Seems cynical and downright miserable to be a person that would only donate $ to fire a person. Sent from my SM-G996U using Tapatalk
  22. Gotcha and that reason does make sense lol Sent from my SM-G996U using Tapatalk
  23. Curious....why not Traylor? Sent from my SM-G996U using Tapatalk
  24. Well, that certainly changes things. If that's the case then they need to send a statement imo. Slippery slope from this to the Karl Malone level of inappropriate relations. Sent from my SM-G996U using Tapatalk
  25. Oklahoma age of consent is apparently 16. So is Australia, where he's from. Doesn't appear to be breaking any laws. It's weird, if my 16 yr old daughter was dating a 21 year old I'd be irate. If my 20 year old was dating a 25 year old I'd be more or less indifferent. It's not the age gap but the age of the girl that is the problem. No clue how a 16 year old could possibly have the decision making abilities to consent to an adult. Sent from my SM-G996U using Tapatalk
×
×
  • Create New...