jimsorgi

I think you're right. Nationally, feels like a top 40 team - so, let's say, 8/9 seed.

That's a good use of an extra roster spot. Like bringing in some developmental players.

Yep. Would be a good depth piece.

How does this affect our swing and miss ratio?

Beyond what you said I think you try to find some depth pieces with multiple years of eligibility who can play a role (even if just a rotation player) for you in future years. Freeman would be great because he'd have a big role now plus could potentially be around.

What's the right amount of swinging and missing? And how does our hit rate compare? Or maybe we're just being a bit negative...

Absolutely!

https://youtu.be/dKR8q_TkJ-Q?si=V64K0_JDBb6RDpbk

I'd eat breakfast at Bailey's Skillet.

Definitely. But there are multiple schools of thought. There are others who think schools that are dedicating a higher percentage of revenue sharing to basketball prefer to wait - plus some schools (apparently) have concerns about how NIL deals will be treated and would rather understand it first.

The district judge on ruling on approval of the house settlement. So after that date schools can start giving revenue share $

The reality is there are two types of schools right now: the ones trying to spend money before April 7 and the ones waiting until after April 7 to spend money. I wouldn't worry too much about transfer portal for another week or two. I understand and agree that it would be great to already have a team together. But it's an odd year.

Big bits understandably get all the attention but little bits have their place too.

Rumor is he doesn't get to choose, but IU is taking care of him: Hard to beat a 1992 Geo Metro. Sources say it's in "pretty good condition given that it's a 1992 Geo Metro."

The most notable thing in his contract is that he was only paid $25k for moving expenses. Come on, Darian, you could have negotiated more than that!