IndianaSconnie90

Well, there's Leal's wiiiiiiiiiiiiiide open look

Ruh roh

For as much crap as Robbie gets for some reason from this fanbase, he's parroting the exact same ideas of IU being better off playing one big, as are stated on this forum

I would feel bad for Penn St fans but they've got another 10 missed 3s to go before they feel our pain

This is the only fanbase that can convince someone that a career 2pt 1 reb and 1ast player could be the savior of this team lol love the enthusiasm, don't believe the sales pitch

I don't understand how we can be this consistently poor at open looks. I dare say I've never seen anything quite like it

Ugly basketball game

They've been pretty fair

Our saving grace today is that somehow, Penn St is shooting it worse from 3 than we are lol didn't know that was possible

Just seem subdued

Well unfortunately this game isn't going to tell us much aside from we're better than a bad Butgers team. A team like that that's missing their best player, you just lean on them until they tire out. Ace made it interesting but beyond him and a little help from Williams, IU could simply out talent them tonight and not go 1-20 from 3s again and win. Weird vibe from the crowd tonight also.

Yeah I'm watching the game actually......

If 19 pts and 4 rebounds is Ace bothered then I'd hate to see him unbothered

If Rutgers wasn't so bad and missing Harper, I might be excited about this.

If they can't blow out Winthrop at AH then, absolutely

At this point I'm not even mad/disappointed. This team is what it is. The coaching staff will be gone after the season once we get pounded in conference play and then maybe we can look forward to getting serious

I wasn't agreeing lol and I wouldn't exactly call myself unagreeable as you insinuate

Ok

Yeah I'm going to disagree completely on all counts. The coaching sucks yes, but this team isn't nearly as talented as some believe it is. There's not a player I'd be sad to see leave once Woodson goes.

This team sucks

Probably not, but that seems to be the official trial period so I'm not surprised

In the case of IU in its current state with the current HC, I promise he answers to the AD. He's done absolutely nothing to put him above anybody in that administration. Sometimes it's more about what you do than about who you know. These are fun conspiratorial discussions but at the end of the day he got his 4 year trial period, he hasn't been successful, no matter what he tells himself, he doesn't recruit, he's arrogant, he doesn't connect with 18 year old kids unless he's holding a big fat bag of cash, and he simply not good at the Xs and Os. He'll be fired at the end of the season, plain and simple

I would be shocked to learn that any coach doesn't report to the AD. That seems wildly innacurate and "rabbit holish"

Eh I disagree with virtually all of your post. We need to stop putting MW above Dolson for starters. He doesn't have the power to overturn SD regarding his job status, regardless of who his friends are. Dolson can/will fire him by season's end. Also, you pointed out proof that the administration can get it right with the CC mention. When left to Dolson/Pam, this administration works as it should. Nobody on the basketball side has any leverage at this point to suggest that Pam/Scott shouldn't be the decision makers this time around

So after having caught up on what I missed here, I've noticed you've not contributed anything of substance in regards to Woodson, or your thoughts on how this season seems to be a replay of everything we've seen out of him. You spent so much time defending him, you went radio silent, and your first post once you figured everyone forgot you was to throw shade at Dusty May lol a coach that isn't here.... Let's hear some good ole Woody defense