IndianaSconnie90

I'm not convinced that Woodson won't be let go mid season if this team continues to torpedo like this in front of a booing home crowd. The optics are far worse if this continues and he lasts the entire season

He doesnt shoot. Hence why he probably doesn't see more minutes

The only thing streakier than MM is a pair of Chris Farley's underwear after taco night

Sweating it out? That’s generous

comeback to earth maybe

Your fortunes can change quickly playing a team like Iowa, good or bad

I said what I said

The guy is a national treasure

Ballo slower than a sloth with broken legs

Frankly, I'm all for just removing the DNFMW thread and renaming this the Mike Woodson thread. Why have 2 echo chambers going when you can have an intellectual coliseum? We already have folks in here that are clearly pro MW so what the hell are we doing? On a side note, I look forward to potentially being given avatar gold today out of the Franimal

Or better yet, throw him on your ignore list. Blissful I tell ya

Yeah ok, you don't get it. Not gonna waste anymore time with you. Easier to throw you on ignored list.

I also have never said that I would rather see them lose so I can only imagine where you're pulling that from

There you go hand waving over the details. Again, FOR THE ONES IN BACK! They didn't just shoot poorly within reason, they shot horrendously bad from 3. They went near 55% from the line. Had IU lost, MR wouldn't have been on my mind because again, this roster has the talent to make up for it. In fact it probably performed better BECAUSE he wasn't available.

Are you really just missing the point of concern here or do you just think you're smarter than everybody else? I don't understand how you don't get the hesitation to feel good about the wins against RU and PSU. You beat RU missing their best player by 10 and only 1 player reaching double digits. You then beat a PSU by 6 who shoots horrendously from 3 and uncharacteristically bad from the FT line. I don't get what leg you think you have to stand on in this thread on this point. More than a few individuals are sharing this concern and you just want to combat it and hand wave it like we're idiots. Did they win? Sure. However, it's difficult to argue that these wins haven't come due to some very good fortune in their favor, as previously stated. That, in turn, is cause for concern for many going forward, like it or not

The big obvious difference being that our roster without MR is still way more talented than Rutgers, but continue

Enough people who have some kind of finger on the pulse have said he's gone after the season, barring a miraculous tourney run.

Really curious if we can ban users from certain threads? Now that's a million dollar question

So your existence on this platform is basically just to be combative? That would explain your choice of thread topics to frequent when you do finally show up and grace everybody with your holiest of opinions. Today's board reaction is par for the course because most people on here can differentiate between a good team winning and an average team just getting by thanks to some good fortune.

True

Yeah ok bud lol keep telling yourself that. I don't know that I saw anyone pick PSU in a blowout though. They've beaten a Rutgers team that was missing it's top player and a PSU that most likely won't shoot that lousy from 3 and FT for the rest of the season I don't do moral victories. This team has yet to play a team worth moving the needle for most.

USC , PSU, & WASH are the only ones that I feel semi confident as wins based on the team we've seen up to this point

That wasn't really the question. You'd get an award for deflecting though

I agree, neither the Rutgers game or this game moved my needle. Rutgers was missing Harper and PSU probably hasn't shot that poorly from 3 and the FT line all season and probably won't again. We've been fortunate these first couple games

Disingenuous argument but sure