Jump to content

hoopsta007

Senior Member
  • Posts

    362
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by hoopsta007

  1. Everyone’s thoughts on the best 1st round matchups (non IU)? I think TAMU and PSU will be a good one
  2. This for real or a joke?
  3. There was also a jump ball they called as a foul and we got away with a kicked ball under the goal. Three fairly important calls all under a minute to go
  4. Look at the bright side. We are done with B1G officiating for the year!
  5. And he camps out in the lane and never gets a 3 second call.
  6. Count me as one of the former matchup “conspiracy theorists” but your explanation gives a lot of clarity and makes sense. Thanks! Glad in your scenario we won’t be shipped out west again.
  7. Betting we also get a 4 seed with UK as a 5 in our bracket
  8. Michigan should feel the same way. If we don’t fit the “desperate,” “hungry,” or “pissed” role after getting stomped by Iowa in our house and being TJD’s last home game then we should pack it up now.
  9. Would be nice to play Virginia in that respect.
  10. Particularly if said 12/13 seed shoots ~75% until garbage time with a large volume of threes. Not many teams in the country who could overcome that
  11. Clear over the back there
  12. Ahh. Gotcha. I like that idea too but see the rivalry issue as being a non starter for many. I do remember one year that they eliminated protected rivalries and I think we played Purdue in Indy OOC
  13. Adding a subtle layer of tanking and strategy for future scheduling……I like it
  14. Random question for you guys. Why have home teams been wearing dark and away teams wearing white? Not sure if it’s been happening and I’ve missed it in the past but I’ve noticed it several times lately
  15. Haven’t watched many mid major games this year. Would you say this year it will be more competitive because of better quality lower seeded teams or more parity among the top seeds?
  16. There will be some adjustment for sure. This is where Woodson should have a pulse on the team. As long as they are willing to play whatever role Woody asks of them to win, then it will be good. Thankfully I don’t feel like we have any me first players so no worries
  17. It’s long past time for reform. If IU were serious about basketball they would be making a USC type move somewhere else. The fact is IU is ok with the corruption as long as they get their cut of the money.
  18. Missed that it is Kellen not Kelvin. Thanks for the clarification!
  19. I may have missed it but is the implication that Sampson could be involved with Notre Dame or Oklahoma? I’d like to think Oklahoma wouldn’t take him back
  20. 4 of the next 5 on the road. This was a much needed win! It may not have been pretty but it is nice seeing us grind a win out against a team with a “tough” reputation.
  21. And on one they gave Rutgers possession for a jump ball that should have been ours. We had the arrow
  22. But he always has to call him Cliff like they are best buddies
  23. A little late but didn’t we have the possession arrow on that jump ball with TJD on the free throw rebound? Why did Rutgers get the ball?
×
×
  • Create New...