Jump to content

HoosierHoops1

Senior Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    3,304

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    7

 Content Type 

Everything posted by HoosierHoops1

  1. HoosierHoops1
    SIAP Hadn't watched this vid before. I thought it was interesting and added a little insight. This was after signing but prior to reporting.
  2. HoosierHoops1
    As per usual for Illinois fans.
  3. HoosierHoops1
    Maybe feeling a touch disrespected, again...
  4. HoosierHoops1
    Matt Carlino, anyone?
  5. HoosierHoops1
    David Williams?
  6. HoosierHoops1
    That's old news!
  7. HoosierHoops1
    Or a few games in. Remember, Curtis Jones' best game (by far) came in game one against a top 3 team.
  8. HoosierHoops1
  9. HoosierHoops1
    go to my link 1 page back. Works perfectly for me
  10. HoosierHoops1
    https://tunein.com/radio/WHCC-1051-s28978/
  11. HoosierHoops1
    To me a basketball play would not be intentional. Wrapping up, is an intentional fouling play. Reaching in to knock the ball loose, is a normal basketball play.
  12. HoosierHoops1
    Because they may get some "real" defensive stops. Teams go on runs throughout the game. Why can't the trailing team go on a 12-0 run to end the game without the foul strategy?
  13. HoosierHoops1
    I think what you're referring to would correct its-self fairly quickly as called intentional fouls would put an end to that "strategy"
  14. HoosierHoops1
    I said wrap up, you know a bear hug. It's different and obvious.
  15. HoosierHoops1
    Exactly, teams can still foul while trapping and it will be a normal foul, foul on a drive and it will be a normal foul, foul fighting through a screen, normal foul. Wrap up a guy the second he catches the in bounds pass, intentional. The refs would determine it based on their experience and the wording of the rule. We all know when it occurs and what it looks like.
  16. HoosierHoops1
    The OP suggested intentional fouls be called as such, all game long, so at any point they would be detrimental to a teams come-back efforts.
  17. HoosierHoops1
    We've gotta keep it in the low 70's or we have no chance.
  18. HoosierHoops1
    Why would it push "winning" time back? If fouls were called like the OP suggested then they would be detrimental all game. Close games down the stretch would remain close games down the stretch. What activities that you attempt to avoid all game, can a football team start doing, in order to win a game they are getting whipped in?
  19. HoosierHoops1
    Yeah, that would more like the Zeller, Abel, Etherington class.
  20. HoosierHoops1
    You taking the over or under on what Grant Gelon averages at Trinity Juco this year?
  21. HoosierHoops1
    There would be an element of players trying to do just that, be we all know what we mean by intentional fouls to end games.
  22. HoosierHoops1
  23. HoosierHoops1
    There are clear differences between that and that accidental foul just so happening to be of the worst ft shooter on the floor, or wrapping your arms around someones waist or slapping their shoulder from behind. For the most part, it's easy to differentiate a foul on a basketball play and a foul designed for a free throw parade.
  24. HoosierHoops1
    Thankfully, I was just messing with you there. Would definitely not be as enjoyable to watch.
  25. HoosierHoops1
    He was the catalyst in more than a couple wins last season without much offense at all. Right place, right time, plus he's a steadying force. Not going to make too many bad plays in crunch time.
×
×
  • Create New...