tyappleg

Reminder: The football Hot Board moved Cignetti down 2 tiers, and then promptly 2 days later... he was hired. I'm not buying Brownell at all. McCollum, I could at least see the vision behind, but it is a big risk.

I don't love it. But it's better than some of the other names that have been floating around. D2 to Indiana is a monumental leap in basically 1 year. Needs to have a great staff around him for this transition.

Probably both; lol. I want to believe.

It's not deleted btw; you just sometimes can't see Twitter posts if you aren't logged into an account anymore /random times even when I am logged into an account. Lol.

Yeah, neither was Myles Garrett, but here we are.

Good. I feel like when I was in HS, I was alone in pronouncing it correctly. Nice to see the kids have figured it out. Lol

It's like the peanut butter, and anybody who answers differently is wrong.

Checking in to see discussions of Brownell and Collins.

I was really hoping to change my avatar, but if Brownell ends up being the guy, it will have to stay for another 4 years until we are right back in this same situation.

EXTEND WOODSON

Oh look; another big name to drive views.

Post it coward.

Him saying IU pulled a "quick trigger" on Archie Miller made him lose the little credibility he had in my eyes. He's clearly not impartial which is a major part of being a national media guy.

I guess my question is his source from IU's side of things or these other coaches side of things? Is he inferring Dolson is "moving down his list" because these coaches/agents have told him they aren't going to IU, or did he hear from an IU source that states Dolson is moving down his list? Those are different in my eye.

I think he was just naming a different guy each podcast to drive views. At the end of the day, he is an entertainer and not a reporter.

Who would be his source for this? Woodson?

Kevin Keatts is the Brad Brownell of coaching to save his job.

I agree about beating Michgian. The way I remember it is that most thought they were in based on resume fairly easily after the Michigan win, then they beat Illinois (a top 4 seed) and lost the next game on a buzzer beater, and then the committee put them as the last team in, and put Michigan seeded above us with a similar resume even after beating them. I just don't think beating Oregon will do anything to our seed line in any significant way.

If I have learned anything, it's that the committee doesn't care about conference tournaments.

I think we are right on the line. Depends on bid stealers I think.

Indiana / North Carolina play in game. Book it.

BRAD STEVENS mentioned. The signs....

This Notre Dame / Cal game is on drugs. Somehow 2 13-17 teams have delivered the game of the year.