Jump to content

Uspshoosier

Forum Moderator
  • Posts

    27,482
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    278

Everything posted by Uspshoosier

  1. I don’t know enough about it to go deeply into I just know the committee heavily depended on it for selection last year. I just have a hard time seeing how you can accurately judge a team like them in this metric when WAB has something to do with the 45th(average bubble team) and they haven’t played a single team 45th or lower and only played 1 team near 45 which was Akron 54 at home. I still think they should be in with how bad this bubble is this year. If Auburn gets in before them then that would be embarrassing
  2. Up 3 with 9 sec to go. Buffalo ball
  3. Akron is in a barrel up 1 on buffalo with 1 min to go
  4. I think it will drop more. Losing to any other team besides Akron was going to drop it significantly I feel. Every team besides Akron has a net above 100 and in Umass case above 200. I see at least a 7-8 spot drop which should still keep them in
  5. https://www.cbssports.com/college-basketball/news/wins-above-bubble-ncaa-tournament-selection-committee-seeding/
  6. It’s a metric on the team sheet. Wins above Bubble.
  7. Should get in but it will depend on what their WAB ends up. If it’s better then 42 then they will get in
  8. I do not but last year i didn’t think West Virginia was even on the bubble and they got left out. Never know when it’s in the hands of a 12 person committee
  9. IU 5 min away from moving up to first team out on Lunardis big board
  10. Tennessee on a run. Up 5 with 5 min to go
  11. Miami up 1 over Louisville with 1:20 to go. Heck of a game
  12. Wisky up 2 with 1:20 to go
  13. Washington has this game down to 6 with 4 min to go
  14. Yeah what to watch is to see where the number ends up tomorrow. It was 33 with only playing 1 team in the top 60 without any losses to the others teams. Add a loss to 210 + team and that WAB is going to take a hit. IU lost 4 spots losing to a team in the 60s NET. Very interesting to see the update tomorrow morning. If it’s still under 42 I will feel good they will get in however if that number falls further down closer to IU then they might not get in
  15. Toledo up 3 with 10 sec to go. Bowling green ball. Mac tourney has been on fire today
  16. Yes I think Cluff a top 40 transfer and 6th rated center cost that much. I know Purdue paid a lot to get him. Boyd was a guard that has played in the national title game so yeah I think he cost some money as well
  17. For sure but not sure they would have had the money to pay all those top players on the same team. IU isn’t Kentucky and have 22 mil to spend
  18. ESPN + is a must during the college basketball season
  19. IU rosters high school composite ranking coming out of high school Sisley-65 DeVries-101 Bailey-188 Alexis-unranked Wilkerson-unranked Conerway-unranked Enright - unranked Dorn-unranked Miles-unranked Harris-unranked Drake-unranked
  20. Yes agree but most of those mid players besides Stirtz were picked to fill a hole in the roster. They had other high major players surrounding them. IU had a whole team of mid major players. Big difference in my opinion.
  21. Goode played in the B1G on a championship level team and spent his whole career in the B1G. Goode experience alone would have been massive for this team.
×
×
  • Create New...