BGleas

So, we have 7 minutes of Troy at point guard?

Our transition D has been terrible.

Wow, 3 horrendous plays there by Yogi, Hartman and OG.

How was that any different than Colin getting knocked to the ground on his layup?

The announcers aren't even paying attention to the game Vitale was just talking about Josh Groban.

This is ridiculous. Why would they not switch?!?! ESPN is the worst.

That saying gets said by sports fans all the time, but it's never really resonated with me. While of course as a player, I never wanted to do anything that would embarrass my coach or the university I played for, and always wanted to be viewed as a classy, respectful, team-focused student-athlete, I'm far more concerned about disappointing my parents and family than I am a coach or school. I played for both.    Also, not sure there's any correlation to winning percentage/winning championships, and having no names on the jerseys.     

But I don't have ESPNNews  :banghead:  

You better not have just jinxed the first game into overtime!!!!!!!!!!!  

Are the 5 stars on the back a '76 Anniversary commemorative thing for this season, or is it part of the uniforms going forward? I think they should keep them there.   

Meh...Wake me up when it gets near 28.   

Yes, IU is talented. But being in Maryland, I can tell you that Maryland fans thought they were going to cake-walk to the Final Four this year. They may still go, but their fans and most of the media, thought Maryland was heads and shoulders above everyone else in the Big Ten.     

Yogi has been fantastic on both ends this half.

OG and Morgan should spend as little time as possible on the bench.

With defense being the issue, why would you not bring in OG for Troy?

I think it took kids for me to stop falling for it. Once the kids come you're thinking "Wait, she's offering to take the kids out so I can stay home and watch the game? Hmmmm, I'm going to pay for this royally".   

That's a trap, don't fall for it.   

Not to toot my own horn, but I predicted it. I was calling for JBJ to play a "Matt Roth" type role off the bench before he got hurt, I felt removing him would dramatically improve the defense, and wouldn't impact the offense too much. I said the offense would be less explosive, but more consistent, that our ball movement and shot selection would improve and that our turnovers would drop.   

Because I think these promises are overblown. Are they made? Probably. But like I said, they're not a lifetime pass to starting or playing. A player has to hold up his end of the bargain for the promise to hold water (ie. working on his game, being a leader, working the classroom, effort, etc.). I don't think it would impact recruiting at all if a coach promised a kid he's start and then he didn't. You'd just explain to future recruits that you told player A he'd have a chance to start, but once he got on campus he didn't put in the required work. Player A didn't hold up his end of the bargain, it's not a free ride, we're here to win, etc.     

There's nothing wrong with it at all. But at the same time, telling a recruit in the recruiting process he's going to start isn't a lifetime pass to the starting lineup, and I don't think any coach offers it that way. So my point is, I think Crean tells guys they'll start in recruiting, but for example, I don't think that's why James Blackmon was starting in year 2 or why Troy Williams plays in year 3 despite his inconsistencies.    Coaches say a lot of things in recruiting, but for the most part all bets are off once the player steps foot on campus as a student.   

I don't think we've had a 5* that didn't deserve to start from day 1? Maybe Yogi, if you argue we should have gone bigger with Sheehey instead? But that's a coin flip.    On the other guys, that doesn't mean that they got those minutes because of a recruiting promise to play them irregardless of performance, effort, etc. I'm sure they were told the opportunity is there to play big minutes as a freshmen, but I can't imagine a coach telling a recruit he'll play no matter what his effort or performance is.    Edit: My comments don't mean I agree with all those guys playing time, it just means I don't think they played necessarily because of a recruiting promise.   

I have no doubt promises are made in terms of starting/playing time, but I'd call them "soft" promises. No coach in their right mind would promise a player he'd start regardless of performance/effort or what's best for the team once the games actually start. You say things like, "you'll be our starting two-guard from day 1, but you'll have to continually earn it, work hard and dedicate yourself, things won't always be easy, etc."   

If this goes to double overtime I'm going to go nuts.

I hate ESPN and I hate Kentucky!

Agree, but it's more than just weight. Morgan is 6'7" and I think maybe even closer to 6'6". He cant defend guys like Haas, Hammons, Stone, Happ, etc., they're just too big. I love Morgan and think he's a really good defender and is going to be a really good player. But he's more in the role of defending guys that are your 3/4 tweeners.