For the last several weeks I enjoyed reading your comments and thought you made some intriguing analysis/assumptions. Reading through this today, you are attempting to beat your assumptions onto others and discrediting any pushback. You could have the most reasonable and explainable take, but if you are antagonistic while saying it your prerogative is nullified. You will never convince anyone that you are correct by telling them they're inherently wrong. Truthfully, about Cupps, nobody here knows who he is and who he is not like. The kid is 2 games into his career, nobody (not even him) knows his limitations. Prime example, look at Braden Smith 53 weeks ago - many would've said he was "limited" but one limit that sucker doesn't have is winning. Hoping Cupps has that same trait of limitless winning and as of 2 games and 2 exhibitions into his career it would seem as if he is trending toward being a winner.
I'm good with anyone's assumptions and analysis on here, it is all good food for thought, but to tell others they are absolutely wrong, and you are correct will not help your case at all. Anyways, carry on friends.