Jump to content

rcbowla

Senior Member
  • Posts

    5,660
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by rcbowla

  1. So more $ to field a roster of 13 than our football coach to field a roster of 85? Something is off here lol Sent from my SM-G996U using Tapatalk
  2. We need players that are evaluated by a competent staff that will fit that staff's system and give them the best chance to win championships. We've had plenty of talent and....well. Sent from my SM-G996U using Tapatalk
  3. I have no idea of the identity of that poster but I do love a good conspiracy theory. If they don't come back and post it could be telling after people called it out. This thread is better than any soap opera or reality TV show. Drama for days! Sent from my SM-G996U using Tapatalk
  4. So I'll ask the obvious question. What is your personal opinion of what should happen. Should Woodson be retained or should IU make a coaching change? Sent from my SM-G996U using Tapatalk
  5. You're giving journalism in 2024 way too much credit Sent from my SM-G996U using Tapatalk
  6. You're not alone. Had same thought. Sent from my SM-G996U using Tapatalk
  7. All she said was that it wasn't a Dolson move against Buckner. Never said it wasn't calculated. Sent from my SM-G996U using Tapatalk
  8. Isn't that essentially what the petition is trying to do??? Sent from my SM-G996U using Tapatalk
  9. 1) I did 2) probably between zero and nada Sent from my SM-G996U using Tapatalk
  10. Also Rabjohns said as much Sent from my SM-G996U using Tapatalk
  11. To piggy back....I also think they'd have to approve the new salary as well? Sent from my SM-G996U using Tapatalk
  12. You do know Woodson wasn't on '81 team right? Sent from my SM-G996U using Tapatalk
  13. And seeing Matt Nover play against IU Sent from my SM-G996U using Tapatalk
  14. Let's say Dolson wants to make a change (sure seems like it). Would the other BoT's be inclined to think it a terrible idea to have a HC remain that the AD won't support 100%? I mean I know he'd have to give lip service but everyone would know that Woddy isn't who Dolson wants. That can't be a good dynamic and I wonder if that'd be enough to sway the vote. Sent from my SM-G996U using Tapatalk
  15. Osterman wouldn't have had that info just laying around right? I say the war has officially begun. Sent from my SM-G996U using Tapatalk
  16. Last year when Woodson was given his raise they also added new language to his buyout. Instead of getting all $12.6 million he would be paid $1million per year. Sent from my SM-G996U using Tapatalk
  17. I want to believe that Dolson and Whitten are standing in a hallway with bad lighting: Scott: I don't know what else to do Pam: Set em free Scott, set em free Scott: Who? Pam: The dogs of war Sent from my SM-G996U using Tapatalk
  18. That's interesting. Very interesting. Scott is learning and may have seen something last year already. Sent from my SM-G996U using Tapatalk
  19. I can see things getting ugly for Buckner real quick. You thought the guy going up to Woody was bad.... Sent from my SM-G996U using Tapatalk
  20. And has 185 signatures. I looked at it 164. Refreshed 3 seconds later and 185 Sent from my SM-G996U using Tapatalk
  21. I agree that the QB factor is a massive monkey wrench to all of this Sent from my SM-G996U using Tapatalk
  22. I see it differently. I've said it before, but when given 2 options: 1) Retire with all the $ you're owed 2) Get fired with all the $ you're owed Now, if you're a proud person and care about your persona, which are you taking? Sent from my SM-G996U using Tapatalk
  23. Plans can change. That can be the plan at the time of hiring Pearl. Sent from my SM-G996U using Tapatalk
  24. Only worse because the pain wouldn't go away Sent from my SM-G996U using Tapatalk
  25. And Hillman for sure Sent from my SM-G996U using Tapatalk
×
×
  • Create New...