BA47591

Once you get passed the first 2 months of DDs tenure, I believe he's done quite well. I think we're in the process of rectifying shortcomings as we speak. He's probably going to win 20 games with this roster. Imagine what he will do next year with a well crafted roster. I would've preferred these things had been in place last March but now DD knows exactly what to go get and the people are being put in place to get the job done.

Head coaches don't build rosters. Assistants do. They have national and now international connections that bubble up names and they go see see them. The come up with a dozen or so names in each class starting when they're incoming freshmen. They start working them it depends on the culture of whomever they're working for on who the put the most time into. DD hadn't been working players for damn near a decade and he thought he had Murphy and Moikobu coming in to build a roster for him that reflected their prowess. Rod Clark was prayer answered but too late to do anything about the 26' team. Kenny and Drew have temp contracts. 2 years each. I have to believe it's because they're were emergency filler and will be replaced. Geoff Alexander and Chin Coleman would immediately change our talent level. Along with Rod Clark, that's a serious staff. All of this will come down to money though. I believe in DD more now than i did when we hired him. He can coach an offense that can hang a banner. He needs talent acquisition specialists.

Early next season wish list. Milka, Luigi, and steal Dylan Darling from St John's. Probably 7m.

92 IU 70 Oral Gun Dana lost this team weeks ago.

I think a couple of tweaks to the staff is necessary. It's about connections and areas of expertise when building a roster. I have faith that next years roster will be more contender capable. The style of play will be easier to recruit to. One thing that hasn't been done yet, is the hiring of a European agent to a recruiting role.

We win this one and go .500 the rest of the way I think we're in. The difference in our team is Dorn. I'm not sure when Conerway comes back I'd mess with the chemistry. Having another guard off the bench would be more valuable. Jmho. If Dorn continues to play at this level with Wilkerson being more consistent, I appreciate the evolution of TDs game to garbage/glue guy... we could be interesting. If we only had a monster in the middle.

It wasn't pretty, but that team had more talent than us at home with a 14 game winning streak on their floor and we out toughed'm. We let a late lead get away but I like to call these moments "Ali/Frazier in Manila moments". We got off the stool in the end when they couldn't. Tucker doesn't have the athleticism to be a star in this league, but he's morphed his game into a dirty work, do a little bit of everything kinda player and it's working for us. Side note: Xavier Booker is one instate kid I'm glad we didn't get. Bailey looked Zach Randolph against him last night. PS. We had the better coach and assistant (Rod Clark). Rod was in Lamars ear the entire second half.

Im gonna have a late night snack. Crow, i believe.... Just beat the teams with worse records and we're in.

I've had a heckuva day. I just wonder if I'll be awake at 9pm.

He's never been a volume shooter. His numbers last year were a bit misleading. If he could knock one down from straight on and use his first step to get down hill and create off the bounce a little could give us something to exploit.

You have to look at our roster realistically. Teams at the bottom of the conference we should be able to win at home and go .500 on the road against. We don't have any conceivable way of beating a top of the conference team, because we can't match talent and/or athleticism with them. 14-9 when we get back from California. We would then need to beat Wisconsin, Oregon, Northwestern and Minnesota at home, go on the road and beat Ohio State to finish .500 in conference. Add a BTT win to give us 20 wins and we get in. That's us playing to the best of our ability. That's going 5-3 to finish the conference regular season. Disgusted with DeVries for staff and roster assembly....ABSOLUTELY. But if he can do the above with this roster he can flat out coach.

True. It's a 5hitty deal to have to find joy with "at least it's not Woody." Results will be similar. Same January nose dive. Woody had talent though. Devries doesn't, but it's his fault we don't.

The initial approach Cignetti used is starting to he copied by Penn St and Oklahoma St, I'm sure others will use it but in basketball coming from a lower level and bringing your players seems to be harder to succeed at. Iowa is in our neighborhood right now and I'm not sure he'll be able to recruit the athletes necessary to compete for conference championships with his style. That's where I think Devries can. If we have a year two roster that looks like this year's then I think our support financially isn't there.

I'm not sure how far the 3 bigs line-up goes in March but they're deep.

Next year we won't look like this. There's nothing you can do when you don't have power conference measurables anywhere. We have nothing to exploit at this level.